2020 Presidential Election Discussion

Originally posted by snowdragon
I'm sure there will be employers that either don't provide this or if they do, I doubt they will pay the taxes when the deferals come due.

It also appears that Trumps exeuctive order to prevent ppl getting evicted only counts if it is going to prevent the spread of covid 19 as well.

Congress really fooked alot of people, good thing they get a break during evictions, food shortages, unempoyment benefits running out....etc etc etc

I'm not sure he actually has the power as president to do anything about evicions unless it affects public health.

Originally posted by Robtard
Payroll tax deferral of 6.2% of Social Security taxes on wages for employees who earn less than $100,000 per year from September 1 to December 31, 2020. Note: This is currently a deferral, not a tax credit. It is unclear whether the taxpayer (employee) or the employer will eventually be required to pay the full amount. -snip

😂

From day one of this announcement, this has always been the case. With Trump saying he will try to work to get it eliminated for 2020 and get the tax break to be permanent if re-elected.

This quote is not a new revelation since Trump directly addressed this during the announcement.

I wish Trump would release his tx returns. Only president not to do so.`

Originally posted by Blakemore
I wish Trump would release his tx returns. Only president not to do so.`

Me too. But the minute after his second inauguration. Or perhaps it should be on the last day of his second term?

Something that's super super maximum troll.

Originally posted by Blakemore
I wish Trump would release his tx returns. Only president not to do so.`

I wish Biden wasn't racist.

I fell for it:

Originally posted by Blakemore
Yeah sure. Wear whatever, I just refuse to call a man "she" because I understand biology. There are things like chromosomes which determine your sex in the ****ing womb.

Try to have some understanding of science.

Explain that to your “friends” on the left. You sound extremely bigoted and hateful. Get help.

Trump should definitely release his tax returns.

Originally posted by Blakemore
I wish Trump would release his tx returns. Only president not to do so.`

Release the racism from your heart.

Originally posted by Blakemore
Yeah sure. Wear whatever, I just refuse to call a man "she" because I understand biology. There are things like chromosomes which determine your sex in the ****ing womb.

Try to have some understanding of science.

While the charlatan Jordan Peterson would agree with you on the usage of pronouns, I wholeheartedly disagree you with.

Personally, if someone born a biological male identifies as a female and prefers to be addressed as "she" and "her", why not do it? It costs you nothing. Seriously rethink your views on the preferred pronoun thing, no need to be a cockstain.

Originally posted by Robtard
While the charlatan Jordan Peterson would agree with you on the usage of pronouns, I wholeheartedly disagree you with.

Personally, if someone born a biological male identifies as a female and prefers to be addressed as "she" and "her", why not do it? It costs you nothing. Seriously rethink your views on the preferred pronoun thing, no need to be a cockstain.

I once knew a lesbian called Dave. We got along well till I blurted out my opinions. I learnt the hard way.

Originally posted by Blakemore
I usuaally do, but I forget a lot of the time.

I once knew a lesbian called Dave. We got along well till I blurted out my opinions. I learnt the hard way.

Forgetting is excusable as is doing so due to reflex. Just correct yourself.

What you were talking about was a biological male who identifies as a female and prefers to be addressed as "she", but purposely referring to them as "he" still. That's just being a dick.

Trump stokes Kamala Harris 'birther' theory

Trump is now pushing the idea that Kamala Harris is not eligible to be VP because of her birth. Is it 2008 again?

Originally posted by Robtard
Trump stokes Kamala Harris 'birther' theory

Trump is now pushing the idea that Kamala Harris is not eligible to be VP because of her birth. Is it 2008 again?

Good find!

What did Trump say?
At Thursday's press conference, Mr Trump was asked about the argument against Ms Harris.

The president said: "I just heard it today that she doesn't meet the requirements and by the way the lawyer that wrote that piece is a very highly qualified, very talented lawyer.

"I have no idea if that's right. I would have assumed the Democrats would have checked that out before she gets chosen to run for vice-president.

"But that's a very serious, you're saying that, they're saying that she doesn't qualify because she wasn't born in this country."

The reporter replied there was no question that Ms Harris was born in the US, simply that her parents might not have been legal permanent residents at that time.

Earlier on Thursday, a Trump campaign adviser, Jenna Ellis, reposted a tweet from the head of conservative group Judicial Watch, Tim Fitton.

What is the law professor's argument?
Prof Eastman cites Article II of the US Constitution's wording that "no person except a natural born citizen… shall be eligible to the office of President".

He also points out that the 14th Amendment to the Constitution says "all persons born… in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens".

Prof Eastman's argument hinges on the idea that Ms Harris may not have been subject to US jurisdiction if her parents were, for example, on student visas at the time of their daughter's birth in California.

In 2010, Prof Eastman ran to be the Republican candidate for California attorney general. He lost to Steve Cooley, who went on to be defeated by Ms Harris in the general election.

Following furious backlash to the Newsweek op-ed, its editor-in-chief Nancy Cooper stood by the decision to publish, arguing on Thursday that Prof Eastman's article had "nothing to do with racist birtherism".

While interesting, it's a well known fact that being born "within the United States", even on a flight, gives the baby citizenship. Right?

So this isn't really up for debate.

The reporter replied there was no question that Ms Harris was born in the US, simply that her parents might not have been legal permanent residents at that time.

After this line Trump responded with:

he said he didn't know about, he had just heard about it and he'd take a look.

Per the video on his press conference around 56 minutes in.

Another media narrative full of BS.......weeee the lies of omission!

Lol, you know exactly the game he’s playing as it’s not a new game Trump’s floating the idea so his foot soldiers pick it up and run with it.

Biden is working with Gina now.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Good find!

While interesting, it's a well known fact that being born "within the United States", even on a flight, gives the baby citizenship. Right?

So this isn't really up for debate.

Originally posted by snowdragon
After this line Trump responded with:

he said he didn't know about, he had just heard about it and he'd take a look.

Per the video on his press conference around 56 minutes in.

Another media narrative full of BS.......weeee the lies of omission!

lol, I swear, Snowdragon is not my alt account.

haermm