2020 Presidential Election Discussion

Started by BackFire523 pages

What would it take for you to be convinced that Biden won fairly. Would it even be possible to convince you of that?

I think Biden won.

I also feel anyone who felt Hillary was cheated cuz Russia and called trump illegitimate(like Hillary did) should bow out of any conversation about this though.

This is not aimed at Backfire, but those who behaved that way will know who they are.

It's like Trump calling someone else fat. Even if the other person is fat and that is a factual statement, should Trump of all folk be saying such things?

In any case, whatever happens close to half the country will never accept Biden or Harris as being a legitimate president. Nor will they have much confidence that our elections are actually safe and secure anymore.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
In any case, whatever happens close to half the country will never accept Biden or Harris as being a legitimate president. Nor will they have much confidence that our elections are actually safe and secure anymore.

Maybe that Trumper "half" (it's actually less than half) will just bow out of voting in all these future "not secure" elections? 🙂

Originally posted by Surtur
I think Biden won.

I also feel anyone who felt Hillary was cheated cuz Russia and called trump illegitimate(like Hillary did) should bow out of any conversation about this though.

This is not aimed at Backfire, but those who behaved that way will know who they are.

It's like Trump calling someone else fat. Even if the other person is fat and that is a factual statement, should Trump of all folk be saying such things?

You can keep thinking Biden legitimately won all you like. The fact is though, close to half country will continue to disagree because we know that massive voter fraud went on.

Nothing anyone here ever says will convince me that Biden actually had a clean win or that our elections aren't being rigged and that our DoJ and courts aren't corrupt after all I've seen and heard, sorry.

Biden won but there have been alot of irregularities with the votes.

The Fort Hood tragedy results in 14 leaders being disciplined.

Further, the preventative systems put in place to prevent harassment or worse are found to be completely ineffective.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/probe-launched-after-vanessa-guill-n-s-death-finds-permissive-n1250372

When an organization is so broken its forced to clean house and start over, that's not an encouraging sign.

Usually it means no one really knew what they were doing when they set things up the first time, and its not likely they know any more what they're doing now.

Originally posted by Surtur
I hope he does.

And I hope you have a poncho too so your clothes don't get wet from the tear tsunami

Why would you hope that? To receive a pardon, one has to allocute to his crimes in open court. And any crimes he does not include are not covered by the pardon. So it would seem to me, that a Trumper would not want someone to be pardoned, because then he would have to admit that the people he supported were criminals all along, just like everyone said they were.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Why would you hope that? To receive a pardon, one has to allocute to his crimes in open court. And any crimes he does not include are not covered by the pardon. So it would seem to me, that a Trumper would not want someone to be pardoned, because then he would have to admit that the people he supported were criminals all along, just like everyone said they were.

It wouldn't bother me, as the other side supports criminals too. It would mean their mouths will remain closed if it happened. So it would be all good 🙂

Originally posted by Surtur
It wouldn't bother me, as the other side supports criminals too. It would mean their mouths will remain closed if it happened. So it would be all good 🙂

It is all good that you are a hypocrite with no principles?

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
It is all good that you are a hypocrite with no principles?

No hypocrisy here.

Though if there were you of all people would be the last one qualified to discuss it 🙂

Originally posted by Surtur
No hypocrisy here.

Though if there were you of all people would be the last one qualified to discuss it 🙂

You just admitted that it would not bother you to support criminals, and you justified it by saying that other people do it too.

Character is doing the right thing, irrespective of what others do. It is following the speed limit even if others are speeding and the police are not watching you.

You just admitted that you have no principles, no character, and no integrity. And you justified it by saying, "Well, what about them?"

What about them? If you are pointing at them as doing something wrong, then why are you following their example? That makes you the biggest hypocrite of them all.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Character is doing the right thing, irrespective of what others do. It is following the speed limit even if others are speeding and the police are not watching you.

So you nor any leftists here have any character? Noted 😆

Originally posted by Surtur
So you nor any leftists here have any character? Noted 😆

By your own standard, your "mouth should remain closed" about leftist character, because you have none yourself.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
By your own standard, your "mouth should remain closed" about leftist character, because you have none yourself.

I never said I agreed with that, just noting your definition applies to you and all your pals.

🙂

Originally posted by Surtur
I never said I agreed with that, just noting your definition applies to you and all your pals.

🙂

Yes, you did. It is your opening statement:

Originally posted by Surtur
It wouldn't bother me, as the other side supports criminals too. It would mean their mouths will remain closed if it happened. So it would be all good 🙂
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Yes, you did. It is your opening statement:

I never said I agreed I have no character.

Keep going?

The US Supreme Court declined to take up a case trying to overturn the results in Pennsylvania. There were no dissenting opinions on the court.

Originally posted by BackFire
The US Supreme Court declined to take up a case trying to overturn the results in Pennsylvania. There were no dissenting opinions on the court.

Oh shit, every single person who rang alarm bells over Amy Coney Barret looks like an inferior piece of shit right now 😆

Originally posted by snowdragon
Biden won but there have been alot of irregularities with the votes.
There haven't.