leftists hurt climate change more than conversatives?

thanks to opposing nuclear power for no reason they set back environmental progress decades

> preach about listening to science
> activists like Sanders opposing nuclear energy 'cause EW NUCLEAR EW

meanwhile if conservatives had their way nuclear industry would continue, and it would prob eventually overtake fossil fuels

now they can correctly say nuclear industry in america is dying because leftists stunted new reactor growth complaining about safety even though new reactors they didn't want built were safer than ones that were left there...

fAIL

Climate change is big for Fly too.

only way for me to be fly is if he were faking being dumb this whole time, i doubt that lmfao

So conservatives are finally moving away from denying the problem? That's progress at least.

I have noticed a conservative friend or two have finally quit denying the problem. He just keeps preaching free market fundamentalism claiming green energy will happen when it's cheaper and easier.

I highly doubt that's the main problem. There are way bigger barriers. It seems to me they would by definition be cheaper and easier.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
So conservatives are finally moving away from denying the problem? That's progress at least.

I have noticed a conservative friend or two have finally quit denying the problem. He just keeps preaching free market fundamentalism claiming green energy will happen when it's cheaper and easier.

I highly doubt that's the main problem. There are way bigger barriers. It seems to me they would by definition be cheaper and easier.

i'm not a conservative and u dodged the question

I'm a "leftist" apparently and yet I've been promoting LFTR as the best chance to get away from fossil fuels for years.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
So conservatives are finally moving away from denying the problem? That's progress at least.

I have noticed a conservative friend or two have finally quit denying the problem. He just keeps preaching free market fundamentalism claiming green energy will happen when it's cheaper and easier.

I highly doubt that's the main problem. There are way bigger barriers. It seems to me they would by definition be cheaper and easier.

#nailed it

Originally posted by Robtard
#nailed it

Originally posted by Robtard
#nailed it

wtf it didn’t even have to do with the op at all lmao

Originally posted by Valkorion
i'm not a conservative and u dodged the question

Originally posted by Valkorion
wtf it didn’t even have to do with the op at all lmao

For future reference try a less obnoxiously divisive thread title.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
For future reference try a less obnoxiously divisive thread title.

#naileditagain

Conservatives like him should really listen to these words of wisdom

nice ad hominem

but *looks through putinbot and robtard’s thread titles* no chance they’d be hypocrites, nah?

An interesting article on climate change:

The Greatest Scandal In the History of Science

"The latest news comes out of Australia, via the website of Joanne Nova. Nova’s February 17 post is titled “History keeps getting colder — ACORN2 raises Australia’s warming rate by over 20%.” “ACORN2” is a newly revised and updated temperature series for Australia, with temperatures going back to 1910 based on records from 112 weather stations on the continent, some 57 of which have records that go back all the way to the 1910 start date…. The ACORN2 data compilation is so called to distinguish it from ACORN1, which was only released some 7 years ago in 2012.
***
Once again we find that the oldest thermometers were apparently reading artificially high, even though many were newish in 1910 and placed in approved Stevenson screens. This is also despite the additional urban warming effect of a population that grew 400% since then. What are the odds?! … The new ACORN version has nearly doubled the rate of warming in the minima of the longest running stations."

^Rightist and their love of denying science. Anyhow.

The Record Temperatures Enveloping The West Are Not Your Average Heat Wave

That story is 10 days old, there's been new records in heat for the time of year in multiple places, this seems to happen year after year. It's almost like there's some sort of change.

If I ever get my own property, solar panels and wind turbines are going on my roof.

Not that I have a problem with fossil fuels, I just don’t wanna pay an electric bill. haermm

Yeah what's the obsession with nuclear power when there are so many renewable alternatives?

And why deny climate change? Like what's the benefit to playing dumb on it?

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Yeah what's the obsession with nuclear power when there are so many renewable alternatives?

And why deny climate change? Like what's the benefit to playing dumb on it?

Because nuclear is the fastest and safest for the environment. Thousands of birds in the US alone die from wind turbines.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Yeah what's the obsession with nuclear power when there are so many renewable alternatives?

And why deny climate change? Like what's the benefit to playing dumb on it?

Because renewables aren't energy dense enough to solve the problem.

They are literally orders of magnitude below even fossil fuels, let alone nuclear. This means the land necessary for production of electricity comparable to fossil fuels or nuclear would override any effects from cutting back fossil fuels.

Not to mention the mining of raw materials for the sheer volume of wind turbines and solar panels required. The Cobalt and heavy metals mining for large scale battery capacity.

Nuclear is literally the only option if people want to get serious about climate change and fulfilling future energy requirements.

And rabbits die from tractors. ☹️

Originally posted by SquallX
Because nuclear is the fastest and safest for the environment. Thousands of birds in the US alone die from wind turbines.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Because renewables aren't energy dense enough to solve the problem.

They are literally orders of magnitude below even fossil fuels, let alone nuclear. This means the land necessary for production of electricity comparable to fossil fuels or nuclear would override any effects from cutting back fossil fuels.

Not to mention the mining of raw materials for the sheer volume of wind turbines and solar panels required. The Cobalt and heavy metals mining for large scale battery capacity.

Nuclear is literally the only option if people want to get serious about climate change and fulfilling future energy requirements.

So nuclear power plants aren't dangerous and don't emit radiation into the atmosphere?

Don't have to give up fossil fuels overnight. It's a transition.

Originally posted by Blakemore
And rabbits die from tractors. ☹️

Yeah I seriously doubt birds are the reason nuclear enthusiasts hate renewables.