It's fascinating to read through the comments to see what some are griping over. Some are saying this is bad cuz Trump messed up their diets lol. One meal isn't going to do that, but okay. Another complaint I see is that it's cheap food.
Yet if Trump was serving lobster and filet mignon and caviar and all that they'd go after him for that as well.
Originally posted by Putinbot1
Does Yahoo still exist? How 1998. So 2 people were upset? Wowzer!
There are thousands of replies...some of them quite funny in terms of what they cry about.
And I can all but guarantee you that this is just the beginning. Wait until tomorrow and we'll have charts and graphs and all that.
Originally posted by Surtur
There are thousands of replies...some of them quite funny in terms of what they cry about.And I can all but guarantee you that this is just the beginning. Wait until tomorrow and we'll have charts and graphs and all that.
How do we know these are legit gripes and not just Rightist pretending to be Leftist throwing tantrums?
Do let me know if the "false flag" angle is still only usable by Trumpers and Rightist, if so, apologies.
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Good question. Definitely the latter because the people who write the articles are often told to write them (as opposed to writing about what they want) and are also getting paid to write them.
Disagree, the ones writing the articles are so pathetic they take it to extreme lengths they didn't need to be taken to. Which is much sadder, no matter if they're getting paid.
One example is, last time this happened, WaPo didn't just write about it...they created an actual chart showing where each kind of food was placed on the table. Sorry, someone talking about these articles being worthless will never be worse than someone writing articles like that. And holy shit it's 1,000 times worse if the guys boss actually uttered the words "make us a chart on where the food was placed". That's approaching nigh infinite levels of sadness if that command was ever given lol.