To give the expanded description of who I am:
Religiously: I am a non-denominational Christian who believes in universal reconciliation.
Morally: I believe morality is grounded upon a trinity of logic/reason, knowledge/understanding, and moral motivation. I believe that moral motivation consists of love and humility, and that the antithesis to that is shame and arrogance which motivate evil.
Demographically: I am a straight white male American middle class college student.
Politically: I am a classical liberal with my primary political values being a belief in individual sovereignty and the coincident individual negative rights to life liberty and property, and the emergence of the state as a social contract in order to enforce those rights. I tend to be against government intervention socially and economically, save for when it comes to protecting those rights. So for example of some degrees of enforcement, socially I am pro-life, I believe government intervention into people's social affairs is necessary to ensure that unborn humans are not denied their right to life, and economically I am in favor of things like labeling laws and the government forcibly enforcing contracts to ensure that an exchange of property is genuine. Beyond that I think the government has a responsibility to manage public property, and enforce its own borders.
Culturally: I'd consider myself a traditionalist rather than a cultural conservative or progressive. What I mean by that is that I view certain traditions as being of central importance to our society (the discourse, the family, the market, etc.), and think progress comes as a direct consequence around those traditions, or from restructuring the dogma around those traditions to better serve those traditions. For example, I'm big on family values, I think long term monogamous sexual/romantic relationships, marriage, and two parent households are of vital importance to both the people who partake in them, the children raised in them, and society at large. As a consequence I think it is in service to those values that such a franchise is expanded to the gay portion of the population. I'm not a rigid inflexible person who thinks that gayism is unacceptable to that aim, and I'm not some delusional deconstructivist progressive who thinks the family itself and sexual monogamy are outdated institutions.
Behaviorally: I tend to be someone whose rather sincere in what I say, though on occasion I slip intentionally or unintentionally into trollishness or edgelordness.