Originally posted by Putinbot1
I don't know, you should ask him. However, his narrative here did not fit with that of the Police or the Authorities or his previous reports. Surely as a "reporter", this is important and the sort of criticism his followers level at the msm.
Ok so the correct answer is zero, not “I don’t know.”
Originally posted by Putinbot1
As stated, not at all. Smollet is getting what he deserves, do I have to repeat everything twice. Please don't derail this thread. Discuss it normally if you are going to.
/agreed
Either prove pool lied or not but stating smollet's sentencing doesn't do anything to change the narrative.
Also in Tim's articles, he did say there was an increase in crime and then made a note if significance that even with the increase in crime it isn't even close to what Chicago is like.
Which to his credit is the OPPOSITE of sensationalism in his reporting of Sweden.
Originally posted by SurturI think the Police, authorities and Demonstrators all still disagree with him and his later reports written at the end of Malmo contradict his earlier reports. I wonder if this is why he put so much effort into marketing himself on Youtube, you know more than me does he do credible journalism for others anymore?
This story is from 2017 so of course since then concrete proof Tim faked something has come out...
Originally posted by snowdragon
/agreedEither prove pool told the truth or not but stating smollet's sentencing doesn't do anything to change the narrative.
Also in Tim's articles, he did say there was an increase in crime and then made a note if significance that even with the increase in crime it isn't even close to what Chicago is like.
Which to his credit is the OPPOSITE of sensationalism in his reporting of Sweden.
Uhh, no lol. That's not how this works, at all. He mentions Jussie in the damn title of the thread.
So yes indeed, we can bring up Jussie all we want, as well as the recent charges against him. If he doesn't like it he should have kept Jussies name out of his mouth for the purposes of the thread.
If he wanted an honest discussion about Tim Pool he wouldn't of shoehorned Jussie into this in any way, period. There was literally no reason to mention Jussie at all, but he couldn't help himself.
So nah, his felonies can be mentioned all the live long day 👆
Originally posted by SurturI think you are stretching here, but carry on derail another thread you don't like.
Uhh, no lol. That's not how this works, at all. He mentions Jussie in the damn title of the thread.So yes indeed, we can bring up Jussie all we want, as well as the recent charges against him. If he doesn't like it he should have kept Jussies name out of his mouth for the purposes of the thread.
If he wanted an honest discussion about Tim Pool he wouldn't of shoehorned Jussie into this in any way, period.
So nah, his felonies can be mentioned all the live long day 👆
Originally posted by Putinbot1
I think you are stretching here, but carry on derail another thread you don't like.
So you didn't mention someone in your title that has literally nothing to do with the thread? And you nor anyone else is b*tching that person is now being mentioned in this thread?
Okie dokie.
Originally posted by Putinbot1
Well I'm out of here for the day as Surtur isn't going to calm down and I have better things to do than have him follow me thread to thread. Later mate.
Lol, this is all you have left now, the "grr u mad".
Why did you need to mention Smollett, when this has nothing to do with him? What was the point? What was accomplished?
Answer: you are butthurt over recent events with Smollett and this is whataboutism. There was literally no other reason to mention Jussie lol.