After New Zealand and Pitsburgh can we profile these guys.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
they are white supremacists, incels, and enablers of white supremacists and incel 'cultures'. however the only ones i concern myself with are those most likely to snap. the rest can just enjoy their internet hate porn for all i care.

Overall agreed, but imo and to the topic, drawing the line after the fact (ie murder spree) is kind of pointless. Take the (main) NZ shooter, at one point he was likely just a harmless angry guy watching simulated rape porn, posting hate speech on 4chan and decorating his room with Pepe memes; then he went too far and mass murdered.

Same goes with angry Islamic extremist as these two seem to be two sides of the same shit covered coin.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
they are white supremacists, incels, and enablers of white supremacists and incel 'cultures'. however the only ones i concern myself with are those most likely to snap. the rest can just enjoy their internet hate porn for all i care.

Overall agreed, but imo and to the topic, drawing the line after the fact (ie murder spree) is kind of pointless. Take the (main) NZ shooter, at one point he was likely just a harmless angry guy watching simulated rape porn, posting hate speech on 4chan and decorating his room with Pepe memes; then he went too far and mass murdered.

Same goes with angry Islamic extremist as these two seem to be two sides of the same shit covered coin.

I'll have to agree with Broly here, this is blatant targeting by implying. I guess you can deny it, but it's pretty obvious to anyone. I mean, one or two threads would be funny. But damn the multiple threads is just too much. I don't like Surt, I think he's a bit of a turd but I feel these threads just turn the board toxic.

Will have to report this as well and let the mods sort it out, sorry man, this is just too much and I wish you'd tone it down a bit.

Edit2. Oh wait, right thread. Thought it was the wrong one. Strange...

Originally posted by Robtard
Overall agreed, but imo and to the topic, drawing the line after the fact (ie murder spree) is kind of pointless. Take the (main) NZ shooter, at one point he was likely just a harmless angry guy watching simulated rape porn, posting hate speech on 4chan and decorating his room with Pepe memes; then he went too far and mass murdered.

Same goes with angry Islamic extremist as these two seem to be two sides of the same shit covered coin.

There's two sides to every shit coin, Randy.

Originally posted by Nibedicus
I'll have to agree with Broly here, this is blatant targeting by implying. I guess you can deny it, but it's pretty obvious to anyone. I mean, one or two threads would be funny. But damn the multiple threads is just too much. I don't like Surt, I think he's a bit of a turd but I feel these threads just turn the board toxic.

Will have to report this as well and let the mods sort it out, sorry man, this is just too much and I wish you'd tone it down a bit.

Edit2. Oh wait, right thread. Thought it was the wrong one. Strange...

Originally posted by Putinbot1
if you infer Surt has these characteristics it's on you. I have outright said he will never be a shooter.

Like I said, I guess you can deny it. But this kind of high school imply-bullying isn't really fooling anyone. /shrug.

Like I said, wish you'd tone it down, but I guess you're out to get Surt for one reason or another. Hey, I don't blame you. But if you could it keep it to one thread please, would be great for the rest of us.

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Like I said, I guess you can deny it. But this kind of high school imply-bullying isn't really fooling anyone. /shrug.

Like I said, wish you'd tone it down, but I guess you're out to get Surt for one reason or another. Hey, I don't blame you. But if you could it keep it to one thread please, would be great for the rest of us.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
I'm honestly not out to get anyone, the incel problem is enourmous.

Like I said, I can't really stop you from denying it.

Any chance you can at least put all incel-related issues into one thread (like they did the "Leftist hypocrisy" thing)?

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Like I said, I can't really stop you from denying it.

Any chance you can at least put all incel-related issues into one thread (like they did the "Leftist hypocrisy" thing)?

Originally posted by Putinbot1
these are all different issuesthat arose overv period of many weeks, but all became relevant now. They are asking very different things.

Just like all the "Leftist hypocrisy" examples that are posted are all different issues that arose over a period of many weeks/months.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Just like all the "Leftist hypocrisy" examples that are posted are all different issues that arose over a period of many weeks/months.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Just like all the "Leftist hypocrisy" examples that are posted are all different issues that arose over a period of many weeks/months.

Bingo.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
They really aren't on the same scale as mass shootings, hatred to 1.2 billion people and hatred to 3.5 billion women. But crack on.

Equalization tactics. The go-to

Originally posted by Putinbot1
They really aren't on the same scale as mass shootings, hatred to 1.2 billion people and hatred to 3.5 billion women. But crack on.

Them being on a larger scale would be a good reason to keep them all in one mega-thread as separate threads are more likely to get buried and forgotten.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Them being on a larger scale would be a good reason to keep them all in one mega-thread as separate threads are more likely to get buried and forgotten.

Originally posted by Robtard
Equalization tactics. The go-to

Originally posted by Putinbot1
not really it would be impossible to discuss all the different aspects at once. Especially when all the issues become topical again all at once. This provides an incredibly nuanced overview. But i get why people might want to avoid an IMAX exprience.

Exactly which of your multitude of separate threads contain a nuanced discussion?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Exactly which of your multitude of separate threads contain a nuanced discussion?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Exactly which of your multitude of separate threads contain a nuanced discussion?

Will have to agree, it would have been one thing if the threads were made with the intention of creating discussion. But as far as I can see, it's been one shitpost thread after another.

Whirl, I get that trolling certain ppl is how you have your fun (but seriously, at your age, with several families and kids and a career as you say you have, isn't there better things you should be doing? I have one daughter and one wife and and am semi-retired and I barely have time to post more than every few weeks), but damn man, this is just too much.

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Will have to agree, it would have been one thing if the threads were made with the intention of creating discussion. But as far as I can see, it's been one shitpost thread after another.

Whirl, I get that trolling certain ppl is how you have your fun (but seriously, at your age, with several families and kids and a career as you say you have, isn't there better things you should be doing? I have one daughter and one wife and and am semi-retired and I barely have time to post more than every few weeks), but damn man, this is just too much.

Oh shit, Nibs is older than I thought...

Thought you were 20s or 30s.