As Russia collusion fades, Ukrainian plot to help Clinton emerges

Started by dadudemon5 pages

Originally posted by Robtard
Wasn't directed to me, but I'll bite as a means to maybe salvage this thread as Surt's shitting/trolling even in his own thread like a doofus.

For one, when a story opens up with a lie, it puts me on notice. Mueller was appointed May of 2017, that means he's approaching two years, not three. But that could have also been a minor mistake and not intentional.

As for investigating whether the Clinton and/or the Dem party colluded with Ukraine to sway our election, sure, bring on the probe, no real complaint here. But it honestly looks like more deflection away from Trump and the still ongoing Mueller probe, which we know little about, so calling it "fading" is another mislead.

edit: KMC broke the link, but you can google to see Mueller was appointed May of 2017. As I remember Trumpers praised him and probe and then 3ish weeks later claimed he was "deep state" and a criminal spear tip.

Thanks and will do when I leave work.

Also, the investigation isn't fading: it was formally closed by the senate committee. The results submitted, as well. Trump wasn't charged, indicted, or arrested. It's done. Unless there's something else I'm missing, this is a closed case.

As far as Dems and foreign "collusion": it's probably true. 99.992% likely.

I think you're conflating the Senate investigation with the Mueller Probe. The first was closed; the probe is still probing. Everyone expected the Republican lead Senate to clear Trump.

Dear God

Originally posted by dadudemon
Ohhhhh, that explains it. That explains why I am seeing tons of news articles and coverage over the McCain stuff: trying to drowned out the Democrat-stuff.

Those sneaky fools. They almost had me thinking that Trump-Bullying a well-respected deceased vet was more important than more treason from major political parties.

McCain was Republican in name only. He is controlled opposition so in other words he's there to pretend to help Republican voters but actually stabs them in the back. For example he talked about repealing Obamacare but at the last minute helped keep it in.

Originally posted by Deadline
McCain was Republican in name only. He is controlled opposition so in other words he's there to pretend to help Republican voters but actually stabs them in the back. For example he talked about repealing Obamacare but at the last minute helped keep it in.

Good lord, another one of these.

McCain wanted the ACA repealed only if there was a suitable replacement ready, since there wasn't, he had to vote no and it was the smart move.

Originally posted by Robtard
Good lord, another one of these.

McCain wanted the ACA repealed only if there was a suitable replacement ready, since there wasn't, he had to vote no and it was the smart move.

Nope that was his cover. He's not going to tell people he's selling them out. If he's such a great Republican then why was he in Syria supporting ISIS? Repbulican voters were tired of foreign wars why was he trying to start them.

Like Rand Paul said "McCain never met a war he didn't like."

Originally posted by Deadline
Nope that was his cover. He's not going to tell people he's selling them out. If he's such a great Republican then why was he in Syria supporting ISIS? Repbulican voters were tired of foreign wars why was he trying to start them.

Like Rand Paul said "McCain never met a war he didn't like."

As far as the ACA vote, incorrect, he voted no because his own party failed to have a proper replacement ready. You don't leave millions of people without insurance and then say "we'll figure something out later". You have the better plan ready and then you repeal the ACA.

The rest of what you said is silly conspiracy nonsense. McCain was a staunch Republican.

Originally posted by Robtard
As far as the ACA vote, incorrect, he voted no because his own party failed to have a proper replacement ready. You don't leave millions of people without insurance and then say "we'll figure something out later". You have the better plan ready and then you repeal the ACA.

The rest of what you said is silly conspiracy nonsense. McCain was a staunch Republican.

Deadline loves a conspiracy.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Deadline loves a conspiracy.

Seems every Trumper loves them. Deep states, controlled opposition, Jade Helms, body doubles, oh my.

Originally posted by Robtard
I think you're conflating the Senate investigation with the Mueller Probe. The first was closed; the probe is still probing. Everyone expected the Republican lead Senate to clear Trump.

Sort of. Both are supposed to be done. The senate thing is closed and the report is done and submitted. The report being Mueller's report.

So what's left? Why are there calls for the Mueller report to be made public if he's still working on it?

Originally posted by Robtard
As far as the ACA vote, incorrect, he voted no because his own party failed to have a proper replacement ready. You don't leave millions of people without insurance and then say "we'll figure something out later". You have the better plan ready and then you repeal the ACA.

The rest of what you said is silly conspiracy nonsense. McCain was a staunch Republican.

And the research on it showed that ACA did not save the average American money, it cost the average American more. It was a terrible position for McCain to take and part of why he was lambasted by his own party for that vote.

Trump also said he would make it better or replace it with something better. Has he done either, yet (I think the answer is a solid no)?

Originally posted by Robtard
As far as the ACA vote, incorrect, he voted no because his own party failed to have a proper replacement ready. You don't leave millions of people without insurance and then say "we'll figure something out later". You have the better plan ready and then you repeal the ACA.

Thats his excuse, he's not a Republican if he did he wouldn't have supported ISIS.

Originally posted by Robtard

The rest of what you said is silly conspiracy nonsense. McCain was a staunch Republican.

Yes you will notice that you didn't actually respond with an argument that's because you can't refute the point.

Pretty sure there’s a photo of McCain floating in the net of him with some of ISIS top brass. Could be wrong. Who knows.

McCain supported ISIS... And people say I troll.

Obama administration was suppporting ISIS McCain went over there to meet them.

https://twitter.com/senjohnmccain/status/339455679800700928?lang=en

https://www.businessinsider.com/troops-protest-syria-military-strike-2013-9?r=US&IR=T

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x95hPS7lIxc

Originally posted by Deadline
Thats his excuse, he's not a Republican if he did he wouldn't have supported ISIS.

Yes you will notice that you didn't actually respond with an argument that's because you can't refute the point.

Originally posted by SquallX
Pretty sure there’s a photo of McCain floating in the net of him with some of ISIS top brass. Could be wrong. Who knows.

^ Two cut from the same cloth.

For normal people: The man in the photo with McCain isn't Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi as Trumpers have claimed.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
McCain supported ISIS... And people say I troll.

TBF, I don't think it's trolling with them, just low intelligence

Originally posted by Robtard
^ Two cut from the same cloth.

For normal people: The man in the photo with McCain isn't Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi as Trumpers have claimed.

👆 Deadline, Buzz Aldrin doesn't strike me as the kind of guy to go to the moon. What do you think?

Originally posted by Robtard
^ Two cut from the same cloth.

For normal people: The man in the photo with McCain isn't Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi as Trumpers have claimed.

Even if that's not the case the Obama administration was supporting ISIS in Syria what was he doing there? Republican voters didn't want a war, even if it wasn't ISIS it's not his place to be there causing trouble.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Sort of. Both are supposed to be done. The senate thing is closed and the report is done and submitted. The report being Mueller's report.

So what's left? Why are there calls for the Mueller report to be made public if he's still working on it?

The senate judiciary committee one wrapped up(might have the name wrong here), but I believe the Mueller probe is separate and it's still ongoing though supposedly very close to be finished. When it's done Mueller will submit his findings to the Attorney General and the AG will then decide what to do from there.

The calls are to make it that it has to be made public once it's completed.