The story doesn't even contain anything new lol. Even the E. Jean Carroll accusation isn't new.
But you gotta admit this is funny. These people wrote that article in order to deflect from Biden, Rob in turn posted the article in order to deflect from Biden.
It gets even better: the guy who can't stop saying Trumpers are taking marching orders is taking marching orders of his own.
That's a beautiful thing.
Originally posted by dadudemonSeveral? I posted one story about the Senate rejecting Joe Biden's request to search for records on Tara Reade and then two other more malleable sources (to certain types) of the same story. So you're wrong with that claim.
Just wondering.Why are you posting several Biden-defense stories but only anti-Trump stories? Do you have an agenda to defend Biden but disparage Trump?
If you're a left-centrist like you state, which is also what Silent Master and I are, why would you have any interest at all in defending Biden?
As far as me posting in this thread again, the story updated, so I posted on topic and noted "Update". It's right there in my post.
You're not center-left, you're a "true centrist" per your own words.
Originally posted by Surtur
The story doesn't even contain anything new lol. Even the E. Jean Carroll accusation isn't new.But you gotta admit this is funny. These people wrote that article in order to deflect from Biden, Rob in turn posted the article in order to deflect from Biden.
It gets even better: the guy who can't stop saying Trumpers are taking marching orders is taking marching orders of his own.
That's a beautiful thing.
Originally posted by Silent Master
So, the story is 4 days old and yet contains no new info. sounds like the writer released it in the hopes of deflecting attention away from Biden. So, my question isRob, why did you fall for it?
Does it really have to be explained that when the story was initially published it was 23 women accusing Trump, now it is 25.
25 is greater than 23. It's greater by a factor of 2, so the story was updated. Cope again, Trumpers.
Originally posted by Robtard
Several? I posted one story about the Senate rejecting Joe Biden's request to search for records on Tara Reade and then two other more malleable sources (to certain types) of the same story. So you're wrong with that claim.
If I can prove that you've posted in defense of Biden more than once, will you admit that you have defended Biden more than once?
As far as me posting in this thread again, the story updated, so I posted on topic and noted "Update". It's right there in my post.
Originally posted by Robtard
You're not center-left, you're a "true centrist" per your own words.
I've since learned that I am not a true centrist but a center-left:
From September 3rd, 2018:
Originally posted by dadudemon
I am the same. 👆Best way to sum me up is a true centrist. I was at a -0.5, -1.44 on this test:
https://www.politicalcompass.org/analysis2?ec=-0.5&soc=-1.44
That puts me very close to central but still enough of a libertarian leaning that I can't quite be a perfect centrist.
As of 3 weeks ago:
And as of 3 months ago:
I am allowed to correctly update my political positions when presented with new information. Being close-minded is the bane of politics.
Clearly, my positions are far more nuanced than just "center-left", however. I'd be a super liberal when it comes to personal choices but I'd be a conservative when it comes to fiscal-responsiblity.
But that doesn't explain why you're coming to the defense of Biden. Would you care to actually discuss this or do you want to treat me like Surt and pretend like you haven't defended Biden but attack Trump? I'd like to know why you don't attack Biden and Trump if you're Center-Leftl ike I am.
Originally posted by Robtard
Does it really have to be explained that when the story was initially published it was 23 women accusing Trump, now it is 25.25 is greater than 23. It's greater by a factor of 2, so the story was updated. Cope again, Trumpers.
It it was a factor of 2, it would be 12.5 becoming 25.
uhuh
Originally posted by Robtard
-In June 2019, columnist E. Jean Carroll accused President Donald Trump of sexually assaulting her by forcing his penis inside her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in the mid-1990s.[/i] -snip
There is semen on her dress from that assault. I cannot wait for his DNA to be subpoenaed in her defamation lawsuit against him. The Trumper meltdown is going to be epic.
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
There is semen on her dress from that assault. I cannot wait for his DNA to be subpoenaed in her defamation lawsuit against him. The Trumper meltdown is going to be epic.
If it's after he loses in Nov, then they'll pretend to not care and claim that they didn't really ever support him. They just liked how he "triggered libtards" and that is all, but never supported him, his actions or policies. Watch.
Originally posted by Robtard
If it's after he loses in Nov, then they'll pretend to not care and claim that they didn't really ever support him. They just liked how he "triggered libtards" and that is all, but never supported him, his actions or policies. Watch.
Going by the Hillary standard, nothing he does will matter once he's out of office or not involved in any effort to be elected to office.
So if this day comes, I will do what you guys do and go "Impeach him" 🙂