Originally posted by Putinbot1
Particularly, given the dates, he decided to release.
What's funny, you have Trumpers magically now saying they don't give a shit what happens to Assange (eg Surt) and a not-Trumper like me saying I hope Assange still gets a fair trail and that's not the problem, the problem is me saying that I only lost faith in Assange in 2016 after he showed himself to be biased and a toadie to Russia.
Originally posted by RobtardI lost faith in him then too, ti be honest Rob, everyone deserves a fair trial. Trump deserves a fair trial now too.
What's funny, you have Trumpers magically now saying they don't give a shit what happens to Assange (eg Surt) and a not-Trumper like me saying I hope Assange still gets a fair trail and that's not the problem, the problem is me saying that I only lost faith in Assange in 2016 after he showed himself to be biased and a toadie to Russia.
Originally posted by Robtard
What's funny, you have Trumpers magically now saying they don't give a shit what happens to Assange (eg Surt) and a not-Trumper like me saying I hope Assange still gets a fair trail and that's not the problem, the problem is me saying that I only lost faith in Assange in 2016 after he showed himself to be biased and a toadie to Russia.
What have I ever said to imply I care what happens to Julian Assange?
Originally posted by Robtard
You said "I give two shits either way" in regards to Assange's situation just the last page, sporto.While your grammar is shit, it's clear what you meant, you don't care (now).
It means I don't care if he is found guilty or innocent. It doesn't mean I do not care about due process.
Originally posted by RobtardIt's ironic that your only criticism seems to be that he wasn't up front about his bias... Since it seems to me that is what you are doing here as well.
When your stance is that you're a neutral player who exposes wrongs regardless of where they stem from, it matters. That was kinda Wikileaks company culture. Now if Assagne had professed himself as a biased player playing for one side and Russian buttboy, no problem.To your question. Absolutely.
I said I hope he gets a fair trial.
Let's be honest... Nobody was unbiased about 2016. Not the media, not the parties, not the public, and not Assange. There were plenty of people hell bent on Trump's destruction... Maybe Assange saw his niche more as going after Hillary and the DNC because of this or maybe he was just trying to help Trump win for whatever reason. Bottom line is some of the info he released helps us scrutinize the corruption in the Democratic party in a way that could be beneficial to the party long term... Or could at the very least benefit under dogs like Sanders short term.
Either way... Are you certain that if he had admitted his bias you would have been ok with said "interference"?
Remember when Chomsky was considered the left wing Jesus?
The only way Assange is going to the us is of his own free will.
Right now He is in The Queens courts
They're not going to fail to hold him for a full year in her majesty's prison service for skipping bail.
When he's released the statute of limitations will be long past on the two alleged assault claims with no wittnesses and no supporting evidence after 2 criminal investigations in 7 years in Sweden.
J.A. exists outside the reach of any government.
His legal team will keep it that way.
With ridiculous ease.