Originally posted by TempAccount
Only a naive child would believe that a hermit country with no economy has any chance of standing 5 minutes against any developed country.
Uh, yeah... well no one thinks that do they? Of course he couldn't beat most developed nations in a conventional war but the fact is he has nuclear weapons, does he not? And he's a brutal dictator as well. Those two specific facts make him dangerous. Doesn't matter if his country is a "hermit" country and doesn't matter if his country has a shitty economy (which I agree it does).
Apparently, you couldn't tell that I was making a joke to you in my reply above. I wasn't being serious. Lighten up.
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnaeI'm not over thinking it.. you're under thinking it.
Yeah, as I said, the poll only allowed 10, Mike. There were several others I wanted to put on poll (like the leader of Iran, for example) but alas I wasn't allowed. If you wanna make your own poll with your own choices then you're more than welcome to. I thought about making a poll of "World's Best Leader" but I think we all already know deep down whether people wanna admit it or not who should win that, right? Initials of DT? 😉I think you're overthinking too much in regards to the criteria used to judge who is the worst. Just pick who is overall the worst in your mind.
No need to overcomplicate it.
And Trump is far from the best world leader... At best he's sub par and at worst he's probably the worst president we've had in quite some time
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
I’m glad to see some people’s bias didn’t affect this poll
The fact that Merkel is in second place is trollololol.
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Define worst.
Kim Jong Un is actually quite good at caring about himself, for example.
Originally posted by mike brown
I'm not over thinking it.. you're under thinking it.And Trump is far from the best world leader... At best he's sub par and at worst he's probably the worst president we've had in quite some time
Disagree.
Nah, Trump is the best in the world and he's by far the best president we've had since Ronald Reagan. 👆
@ StyleTime
Not to mention that pursuing nuclear weapons is arguably a logical geopolitical policy for countries like Iran and NK. They have no realistic way to win the actual favor of the United States other than to completely overturn their current regimes. Going nuclear is the best possible safeguard against NATO led attempts at regime change.
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnaenot really. Even if you agree with his policy objectives he's pretty inept at actually getting anything passed through Congress. The main achievements under his belt (such as the supreme Court nomination and the tax breaks for the rich) are things that literally any Republican in his position would have accomplished.
Disagree.Nah, Trump is the best in the world and he's by far the best president we've had since Ronald Reagan. 👆
Originally posted by Patient_Leech
oh lord, prove to me that you understand evolution, because most creationists don't even understand how it works. And it's sort of the foundation of biology and the diversity of life on earth. A little important.
I believe in evolution, but I'm curious about the explanation for macroevolution.
So like, I'm not arguing there isn't an explanation, I'm sure there is, I'm just curious what that explanation is.
So like, for example a wing, in something of the transitory state between not having a wing and having a wing, how is the transitory state beneficial enough to survival for it to get passed on?
Again, not me trying to argue against it, just trying to feed my own curiosity for information.
Originally posted by mike brown
not really. Even if you agree with his policy objectives he's pretty inept at actually getting anything passed through Congress. The main achievements under his belt (such as the supreme Court nomination and the tax breaks for the rich) are things that literally any Republican in his position would have accomplished.
Bingo.
I'd also argue that someone like Jeb Bush or John Kasich would have had a much easier and smoother time getting those same things done due to higher levels of political competence and what comes with that.
Originally posted by Surtur
do you guys think jesus would kill a baby hitler, lets say he had no other way to alter the timeline, so it's not like he can take the baby and raise it.
Uh... no. He wouldn't. These hypothetical games are pretty fun sometimes but why are you posting that in ths thread, Surt?