Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
Yes, but thor in the first avengers was still only a little bit stronger than iron man in the woods. I think steve with the extra damage output and defense with his shield would be able to take a slightly gimped thor.
He was a lot stronger than him even when Iron Man was super charged to 400%. Remember how casually he crushed his armor? He could have killed him if he wanted to.
Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
So the question become how much stronger exactly did steve get?
Spoiler:
Apparently he's at the same level in all movies, it's just that in some films he has better feats.Otherwise, it shouldn't have been possible for Avengers 1 Cap to perform that good against the current version.
Cap dominates both these versions of Thor. He should be on par with even peak Thor, from IW- wielding Stormbreaker and GOT mode.
Endgame Thor was arguably the weakest version so far.
Spoiler:
He couldn’t even overpower base Thanos- when in IW he overpowered him WHILE he wielded the IG with all the stones.
Captain America was a deadly dude with Mjolnir. The power of Thor added to his abilities makes him one bad hombre. I think he would have beaten the shit out of the Hulk for example tbh. That hammer/shield combo, combined with the lightning would have messed almost everyone else up.
If that last hammer strike had hit Thanos, I think he might have taken Thanos down.
Thor in Endgame was way off his prime, but he was obviously still very strong (As seen when he was grappling with Thanos, and even started overpowering him when Captain America helped)...but he was like....fat and soft? Clearly just off his game. And Stormbreaker is still a one-shot kill.
Not sure who'd win.