Worthy Quicksilver vs Thanos/Superman

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Apocalypse was able to react to QS speed. If he can, so can Superman.

False equivolency.

And even if Superman reacts, he would still be moving in slow motion to QS.

Forget it, Supes is out of his league here.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
False equivolency.

And even if Superman reacts, he would still be moving in slow motion to QS.

Forget it, Supes is out of his league here.

The problem is how do we know that Superman was moving significantly slower than QS (mansion scene)? Not saying that he wasn't though.

If you can't prove Superman is fast enough, then he isn't. That's how debates here work

Originally posted by h1a8
The problem is how do we know that Superman was moving significantly slower than QS (mansion scene)? Not saying that he wasn't though.

Because the mansion feat was far more quantifiably impressive.

The CW Flash (at his fastest) can go far faster than Quicksilver, if you just need to give DC a win over Marvel.

But Justice League Superman is out of his depth.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Because the mansion feat was far more quantifiably impressive.

The CW Flash (at his fastest) can go far faster than Quicksilver, if you just need to give DC a win over Marvel.

But Justice League Superman is out of his depth.

Why was it though?
Can you quantify Superman's feat in order to compare?

H1 is trolling

This board goes by feats, if you can't provide an example that proves Superman is fast enough. Then as far as this board is concerned, he isn't.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
False equivolency.

And even if Superman reacts, he would still be moving in slow motion to QS.

Forget it, Supes is out of his league here.

No he’s not.

Originally posted by Silent Master
This board goes by feats, if you can't provide an example that proves Superman is fast enough. Then as far as this board is concerned, he isn't.

That example can be argued that he is fast enough.
We see lightning propagating through the air at a much slower rate.

Originally posted by h1a8
That example can be argued that he is fast enough.
We see lightning propagating through the air at a much slower rate.

If you think you can argue that Superman is fast enough, go ahead.

h1a8 youve already stated you believe QS is faster on page 5:

Originally posted by h1a8
It's my opinion that QS is possibly faster than both Superman and Flash (because of the mansion scene and not the kitchen scene). I even stated that he wins here.

So not sure what the purpose of your argumentation is here.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
h1a8 youve already stated you believe QS is faster on page 5:

So not sure what the purpose of your argumentation is here.

He's trolling.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
h1a8 youve already stated you believe QS is faster on page 5:

So not sure what the purpose of your argumentation is here.

There is a difference between a stomp and a win.
You were making it out that QS is so far faster than Superman that he would near statue him.

It's my opinion (key word) that QS is faster, but not by a whole lot.
Noticed in the quote that I said, "possibly". This means that I'm not sure.

Originally posted by Silent Master
If you think you can argue that Superman is fast enough, go ahead.

I can easily argue it just for the fun of it, not to say that I believe it though.

Its my opinion that QS is most likely about twice as fast.
But it can be argued that Superman is just as fast or faster using the speed of the lightning.

Go ahead, just make sure that you don't go against standards for proof that you've previously held others to.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Go ahead, just make sure that you don't go against standards for proof that you've previously held others to.

Clarify. What standards are these?

Well, among others things you've argued that them getting the physics or CGI wrong means the feat doesn't count.

Originally posted by h1a8
There is a difference between a stomp and a win.
You were making it out that QS is so far faster than Superman that he would near statue him.

It's my opinion (key word) that QS is faster, but not by a whole lot.
Noticed in the quote that I said, "possibly". This means that I'm not sure.

Youve said QS wins this.

So why continue to argue over how much he wins by?

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Youve said QS wins this.

So why continue to argue over how much he wins by?

Because I disagree with that assessment.
If you believe QS wins then why argue how much?
It must matter to you right?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Well, among others things you've argued that them getting the physics or CGI wrong means the feat doesn't count.

I didn't argue they got the cgi wrong. You did.