Do we need an Incel watch list.

Started by BrolyBlack4 pages

Originally posted by Robtard
Your pretend win ranting aside, you also must realize that maybe if you left your mother's house you could meet a girl organically? There's single women not behind a computer or phone screen which you can actually *gasp* talk to in person and see where it goes.

Yes, you will get turned down by some (a lot?), that happens to everyone even your archnems the "super chads".

I could not imagine anyone taking advice from the creepy old guy on a dead movie forum

Originally posted by Zucc
If you're talking about me in specific.

I for one live alone at the age of 21 (below the average age for where my country which is 25) and have a girlfriend, which I had to send DDM a pic of because you insisted on not believing it.

Secondly, are you talking about Cold approaching girls pick up style?

Funny. Didn't expect this from your brand of soy.

No you don't and no you don't.

I'm talking about talking to women, this is normal and it shouldn't scare you.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
We already have a old creepy man who is the watchman, his name is Putin Bot.

We dont pay him anything, we actually steal his time and dont pay him anything to perform this service. Its actually brilliant and working out quiet well.

He has a few non paid employees as well, that we dont pay, we steal their time, and he, theirs.

Brilliant

Do you want to know what prompted this thread? This:

Originally posted by Surtur
Trigger warning, Tim Pool ahead:

FBI Alarmed Over "Rapid Mobilization" Of Far left Escalation

YouTube video

Intriguing!

Lol. So now they're crying and wanting the government to look into "incels". Good stuff lmao.

The few leftists here don’t want to be exposed as soyboys.

Anyways congrats on the new girlfriend

I’m sorry you get followed around by creepy old men.

This is an interesting thought, Whirly.

I can't say it is a bad idea but I can't say it is a good idea, either.

Was it you I was talking to about this kind of stuff? AI can be used to passively flag stuff. But that's not appropriate and the government shouldn't do that unless they have an explicit warrant to analyze stuff from people.

We should do a podcast or something. These topics are far more nuanced than just superficial binary answers.

Originally posted by dadudemon
This is an interesting thought, Whirly.

I can't say it is a bad idea but I can't say it is a good idea, either.

Was it you I was talking to about this kind of stuff? AI can be used to passively flag stuff. But that's not appropriate and the government shouldn't do that unless they have an explicit warrant to analyze stuff from people.

We should do a podcast or something. These topics are far more nuanced than just superficial binary answers.

I can’t believe you actually take his posts serious, he has no interest in discussing this, it’s only aimed at Surtur but he’s got Surtur on ignore, like a man child

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
I can’t believe you actually take his posts serious, he has no interest in discussing this, it’s only aimed at Surtur but he’s got Surtur on ignore, like a man child

You keep warning me about this and keep advising me to stop engaging Whirly, seriously.

I appreciate your kind intentions. I do enjoy talking about some of these things with Whirly, though. He usually gives me a serious answer if I'm responding in good faith.

That’s cool you try. He doesn’t actually care, he wants to make Surtur feel bad, that’s his only goal here.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
That’s cool you try. He doesn’t actually care, he wants to make Surtur feel bad, that’s his only goal here.

On some level DDM knows this, but being a decent guy he wants to give him the benefit of the doubt. It's a wasted effort, but meh.

DDM has known Whirly for over a decade and k ows him better than either of you, I think he will be okay lol.

Originally posted by NemeBro
DDM has known Whirly for over a decade and k ows him better than either of you, I think he will be okay lol.

Thank you, counselor

Originally posted by NemeBro
DDM has known Whirly for over a decade and k ows him better than either of you, I think he will be okay lol.

Nobody said he wouldn't be okay bromosexual. What was being implied is that the very history you refer to can kinda blind DDM to the true nature of Putinbot, but it's okay.

Well...I just want to talk about stuff with my bros. 🙁

If the thread becomes more about actual discussion than trolling Surtur, then...

Bro's over ho's.

LoL @ Surt trying to poison the well for the Whirly/DDM relationship. Doomed to fail from the start.

Originally posted by Robtard
LoL @ Surt trying to poison the well for the Whirly/DDM relationship. Doomed to fail from the start.

You're paranoid again Rob.

Originally posted by Surtur
paranoid

You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means

Bingo

Originally posted by dadudemon
This is an interesting thought, Whirly.

I can't say it is a bad idea but I can't say it is a good idea, either.

Was it you I was talking to about this kind of stuff? AI can be used to passively flag stuff. But that's not appropriate and the government shouldn't do that unless they have an explicit warrant to analyze things from people.

We should do a podcast or something. These topics are far more nuanced than just superficial binary answers.

You see my theory on Incel production is threefold, Incels either never developed the social skills needed to function. Had a bad experience with a woman/women which festered and grew or thirdly suffer PTSD from un women related traumatic experiences or another nervous or mental disorder that led them to struggle with women. All three groups could be salvageable for the vast majority of instances, and some may salvage themselves. These groups of males are easy to identify online, misogyny, anger towards males who are chads or breeders. The mentally ill or trid'g are the most dangerous and will usually have a variety of additional aggressive or antisocial behaviors, they may have a history of stalking exes in relationships, be known to stalk other males online, threaten, etc. Have extreme political leanings. Be unduly needy etc. We could easily profile these people.

I dunno exactly what is meant by incel watchlist but I find the idea of a watchlist based solely on ideology to be kind of creepy tbh.

Like say someone is a wahhabi Muslim... That shouldn't be enough to get them on a watchlist. But if they are engaging with certain known groups or going online and posting things in support of ISIS etc then yes they should.

So with incels I would use the same metric. Shady behavior and associations should be the criteria used instead of ideology.