2020 Presidential Candidate Crashes and Burns

Started by BrolyBlack3 pages

2020 Presidential Candidate Crashes and Burns

What an embarrassment trying to say the constitution was sexist and using it to score political points.

"Do you know how many times the word "Woman" is mentioned in the Constitution?

Zero.

That is unacceptable. Women must be equally represented and equally protected. #ERANow

https://twitter.com/ericswalwell/status/1123408951075397637

Response.

Do you know how many times the word "Man" is mentioned in the Constitution?

Zero.

There's dumb and then there's "can't read or use CTRL+F before tweeting" dumb.

https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/1123592201865326592

...But the word "women" is in the Constitution. If it wasn't, women would still be denied their right to vote. That's the difference: White American men never needed amendments geared toward them specifically, in order to protect them from oppression; because they were the oppressors.

Guess both these idiots are wrong😂

So where is women mentioned in the constitution?

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Guess both these idiots are wrong😂

But you also could have googled the US Constitution and command-f'd it for "woman/women". That's all I did. TBH after amendment #5 I have no memory of which amendments address what/whom. You don't have to be a scholar in order to shut down these talking heads. Most of the time all you have to do is check the source.

I did, most sites I’ve checked says it’s not

Technically the guy was right, as the words which appear are "women" as opposed to "woman". That's no defense for his painfully ignorant comment, mind you. Imho anyone who cannot properly summarize every single amendment of the Constitution is not fit to be president and pledge to protect it.

So who is right, swalwell or the other guy?

Gotta admit I thought this was gonna be about Kirsten Gillibrand saying each American should get $600 to help pay bills.

Nah jk, lmao! She said they should get it so they can use it for a political donation of their choice.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
So who is right, swalwell or the other guy?

They were both wrong, and ignorant of that which they claim expertise. No winners here, nobody was right... except for me 🙂

How can they both be wrong. If they are mentioned Eric is wrong, if they arnt the other guy is right. This is confusing.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
How can they both be wrong. If they are mentioned Eric is wrong, if they arnt the other guy is right. This is confusing.

If I argued that three headed-dragons live in Canada, and you said "no they live in Panama", we'd both be wrong. wouldn't we?

Yes, but im trying to get to the answer, are women and even men, even mentioned in the constituion?

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Yes, but im trying to get to the answer, are women and even men, even mentioned in the constituion?

I already answered that clearly.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
...But the word "women" is in the Constitution. If it wasn't, women would still be denied their right to vote. That's the difference: White American men never needed amendments geared toward them specifically, in order to protect them from oppression; because they were the oppressors.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
Technically the guy was right, as the words which appear are "women" as opposed to "woman". That's no defense for his painfully ignorant comment, mind you. Imho anyone who cannot properly summarize every single amendment of the Constitution is not fit to be president and pledge to protect it.

Missed this

👆

So what I've gathered is a democrat presidential candidate tried to score woke points by spouting some bullshit and it did not turn out well.

Hilarious. This should inspire a new phrase: get woke, become a joke

Did this man, who I guaranteed has cried in the past over Trump being wrong on things, correct his mistake?

so I guess you are going to use this clown as your new "but the left" strawman, surt?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
so I guess you are going to use this clown as your new "but the left" strawman, surt?

^Let's all see if he figures out the irony all by himself.

Ad hominem deflection? What a shock!

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
Ad hominem deflection? What a shock!

^You gonna call out your pal for doing the same thing you're crying about? I can provide you a link if you missed it eat

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
Ad hominem deflection? What a shock!

Honest question, why are you not calling PB out for doing the same thing to me.