IW Thor vs Thanos with sword

Started by FrothByte12 pages
Originally posted by quanchi112
Have you seen the ridiculous arguments from Froth and the troll?

If it was so ridiculous it shouldn't have been too hard for you to prove me wrong. Yet you kept dodging my question:

Do you have any feats that show Thanos blocking/deflecting/parrying lightning strikes?

Originally posted by FrothByte
If it was so ridiculous it shouldn't have been too hard for you to prove me wrong. Yet you kept dodging my question:

Do you have any feats that show Thanos blocking/deflecting/parrying lightning strikes?

How is that even relevant to the winner of the thread. That is your obsession but Thanos can just tank it and beat on Thor after. The winner is not in doubt. I will decimate your ridiculous obsession once the clip is legal. The battle requires critical thinking which you seem to not possess. Bias.

Originally posted by quanchi112
How is that even relevant to the winner of the thread. That is your obsession but Thanos can just tank it and beat on Thor after. The winner is not in doubt. I will decimate your ridiculous obsession once the clip is legal. The battle requires critical thinking which you seem to not possess. Bias.

Are you seriously questioning how being able to block/counter/parry an attack has anything to do with a fight?

Anyway like I said, if it was as big a stomp as you claim then you would not have had to keep dodging my points like you're doing now. Again.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Are you seriously questioning how being able to block/counter/parry an attack has anything to do with a fight?

Anyway like I said, if it was as big a stomp as you claim then you would not have had to keep dodging my points like you're doing now. Again.

I am questioning the revelancy of this alone determining the outcome. You are assuming Thanos actions are irrelevant and that lightning and lightning alone can defeat Thanos despite the fight show us otherwise. Just because you are delusionally opposed to the totality of the facts do not make the presumption of assuming every other person has lost all semblance of logic and reason.

Thanos won. They lost despite tagging him with lightning. Facts will always be more important than conjecture. Just wait. I will just decimate your point of his sword being unable to do so.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I am questioning the revelancy of this alone determining the outcome. You are assuming Thanos actions are irrelevant and that lightning and lightning alone can defeat Thanos despite the fight show us otherwise. Just because you are delusionally opposed to the totality of the facts do not make the presumption of assuming every other person has lost all semblance of logic and reason.

Thanos won. They lost despite tagging him with lightning. Facts will always be more important than conjecture. Just wait. I will just decimate your point of his sword being unable to do so.

If you're so convinced that my points are irrelevant and yours are completely relevant, then you wouldn't have any problems accepting my challenge to BZ this where judges can judge the relevancy of our points right?

I therefore formally challenge you to BZ this topic: IW Thor vs. Endgame Thanos, once the bluray for Endgame comes out. Do you accept?

Originally posted by FrothByte
If you're so convinced that my points are irrelevant and yours are completely relevant, then you wouldn't have any problems accepting my challenge to BZ this where judges can judge the relevancy of our points right?

I therefore formally challenge you to BZ this topic: IW Thor vs. Endgame Thanos, once the bluray for Endgame comes out. Do you accept?

So you will not quit? You did just quit the other. You believe Thor wins over Thanos, right?

Swear you will not quit. Thanos has his dual edged sword. Fight to the death.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So you will not quit? You did just quit the other. You believe Thor wins over Thanos, right?

Swear you will not quit. Thanos has his dual edged sword. Fight to the death.

I swear I will finish the BZ till the end, provided that we elect the judges before we start the match and that we set a limit on the number of posts each one of us can make.

Now, do you accept?

Originally posted by quanchi112
1. You have accepted that but now want to rep Thor. So you get to decide which one. When I say you get one chance it is a simple statement to process. I am allowing you to rep Thor instead but I really prefer Superman. I hav told you why so quit. You conceded the Khan/Vader debate and you are lucky I even accepted. It is not for you it is about Thanos vs. Superman.

I do not have anything to prove to you. I do not care what a troll like yourself thinks. You still may quit this one because you quit the Khan one the day of.

2. No, I offered one you accepted. You just randomly throwing out challenges I have little to no interest in serves no purpose to me. I even gave you the option of substituting Thor.

You are a troll, a quitter, a man who is rarely ever correct about anything and takes trolling positions just to try to get me. In the end you do not even respect yourself enough to have integrity to debate with your honest opinion.

Lmao what?

Quit bitching and lets agree on judges. They can decide who the loser is here 😂

[/B][/QUOTE]

You do realise you are the only one who legit calls me a troll right?

Originally posted by FrothByte
I swear I will finish the BZ till the end, provided that we elect the judges before we start the match and that we set a limit on the number of posts each one of us can make.

Now, do you accept?

First we need stipulations as in number of posts, etc. I need time to think when this would work out best. Time frame. It will if I do accept against my better judgment against someone who just took his ball and went home when we could always have selected judges after the debate.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It is. We must first agree to the stipulations, noobmaster 69. You are so out of your depth here.

I suggest we get someone we both trust to moderate the stips and rules between us, given our history.

I suggest Nib (if he agrees).

He can also call when we start, and when its over and can give the final say on who the judges should be.

You game?

Originally posted by quanchi112
First we need stipulations as in number of posts, etc. I need time to think when this would work out best. Time frame. It will if I do accept against my better judgment against someone who just took his ball and went home when we could always have selected judges after the debate.

Problem with our old BZ was that there was no stips when the debate was going to end. BZ posts take a lot of time to prepare, I simply don't have the time to keep going back and forth endlessly.

So we do this BZ better. Set stips, set limits, elect judges beforehand. It's an honest proposal from me and I will graciously accept defeat if I lose the BZ.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
I suggest we get someone we both trust to moderate the stips and rules between us, given our history.

I suggest Nib (if he agrees).

He can also call when we start, and when its over and can give the final say on who the judges should be.

You game?

We both have to agree to the stips then the judges decide based on the conditions of the thread we agree on.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Problem with our old BZ was that there was no stips when the debate was going to end. BZ posts take a lot of time to prepare, I simply don't have the time to keep going back and forth endlessly.

So we do this BZ better. Set stips, set limits, elect judges beforehand. It's an honest proposal from me and I will graciously accept defeat if I lose the BZ.

Well I wanted us to creatively use our forces so much more to it than a one on one fight.

So an argument, few counters and final summation?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Well I wanted us to creatively use our forces so much more to it than a one on one fight.

So an argument, few counters and final summation?

Sounds good. We can finalize the details once the bluray comes out.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Sounds good. We can finalize the details once the bluray comes out.
Have not officially accepted but I am heavily leaning towards it. After my Superman one I will most likely accept.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Have not officially accepted but I am heavily leaning towards it. After my Superman one I will most likely accept.

I'll issue the challenge again once you're done with that BZ.

Originally posted by FrothByte
I'll issue the challenge again once you're done with that BZ.
If I accept we can set a date. Not sure I want to go directly into another one but if I do we can set a tentative date.

Originally posted by quanchi112
We both have to agree to the stips then the judges decide based on the conditions of the thread we agree on.

Yeah except I dont trust you on that.

Remember the Khan vs ?

We should appoint someone as a middle man. I dont want excuses for you to chicken out of this one.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Yeah except I dont trust you on that.

Remember the Khan vs ?

We should appoint someone as a middle man. I dont want excuses for you to chicken out of this one.

The posters set the stips. If you cannot agree to that I will look for someone else to rep Superman. You are already trying to weasel out of it.

Originally posted by quanchi112
The posters set the stips. If you cannot agree to that I will look for someone else to rep Superman. You are already trying to weasel out of it.

Funny ive not mentioned backing down. You have multiple times now 😂

Its clear you have no interest in an objective judged debate. Youve already complained about judges being too biased here.

The BZ will start when I state it starts and when I am satisfied with the stips and not before.

Youve made me wait a year so no bitching about your precious time.