Also as noted, we’re now in the ‘private business can do what it likes’ phase. Please attack what I actually said, ser.
This boils down to FB/Twitter/Youtube etc no longer in good faith acting as a platform and instead taking the role of publisher. Fine, however in doing so they lose the privileges and protections afforded platform status vs publisher.
Originally posted by snowdragon
This boils down to FB/Twitter/Youtube etc no longer in good faith acting as a platform and instead taking the role of publisher. Fine, however in doing so they lose the privileges and protections afforded platform status vs publisher.
As noted, if you can legally prove that, cool and make it so.
Trigger warning, Tim Pool video:
Facebook Caught LYING About Censorship, Regulation Is Coming
Yeah, you know what? There is to be no whining when these places get regulated. They 100% brought it on themselves. It's not hard to just ban illegal content and nothing else, they couldn't do it and they'll pay the price for their bias. Oh well, can't say they weren't warned.
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
He is wrong, but it is not worth correcting him. Let baby have his bottle, so we do not have to hear his tantrum.
This is bait, right? Here, there's the convo to save you time:
Originally posted by Robtard
eg Back when the homophobic bakers were refusing public service to people cos "eww, gayz!", it was cool and it was decided as such that they should be allowed to do whatever and the market would sink or float them for their actions.
Originally posted by Robtard
The baker issue was an issue of violating someone else's rights. It was a rights issue. eg Someone can't hang a "No Jews Allowed" sign in a public place of business.What issue is this with FB?
Originally posted by dadudemon
No. No sir. You've got that backwards. Literally, the ruling on the case says you've got that backwards.Some tried to violate the cake baker's rights by forcing him to make a custom cake that was against the baker's morals.
Originally posted by dadudemon
The custom cake was a "gay cake." He refused.He got sued. He appealed. He lost. He appealed. US Courts ruled in his favor. Said you can't force someone to do art for you.
Originally posted by Robtard
That post wasn't about the ruling, it was the "Leftist issue" in regards to what the baker did. You'll note I said "issue" four times in that post. Go note it.Also as noted, we're now in the 'private business can do what it likes' phase. Please attack what I actually said, ser.
That last post is what most people know as the "Robtard word-game backpedal special."
For those who don't wanna watch the Tim Pool video, Facebook has at different times claimed to be a platform and a publisher. In court in 2018 they claimed to be a publisher.
Originally posted by dadudemon
This is bait, right? Here, there's the convo to save you time:That last post is what most people know as the "Robtard word-game backpedal special."
Yeah it's a game Rob plays often.
Originally posted by dadudemon
This is bait, right? Here, there's the convo to save you time:That last post is what most people know as the "Robtard word-game backpedal special."
Incorrect.
-My first quote is me noting/acknowledging that what the baker did is now legal and kosher.
-The second quote is me noting what the "Leftist" issue was with the baker's original actions.
-The last quote is me pointing out that you're mixing my points to attack.
Granted, I know you're aware of this and are just doing a thing.
Something I might be thinking about that may change up the equation is foreign countries looking to place demands on social media, such as France, as to what they are not allowed to have on their platforms.
If such a thing is the case, then would the companies in that interest already be stripped of their private business freedoms by foreign governments? And would the question become, do we pass legislation so that other countries cannot dictate what Americans are allowed to say on social media, or do we do nothing and let them dictate it, since either way the companies have lost their private business freedoms.
Trigger warning, Tim Pool video:
White House REFUSES Major International Call For Censorship Online
Originally posted by Surtur
Trigger warning, Tim Pool video:White House REFUSES Major International Call For Censorship Online
That’s good