Originally posted by One Big Mob
Because all those characters have good showings against people he hates/people put above OPM.He's indirectly going after the Superman fans and random Marvel fans by saying his boy stomps them there dudes. And because Saitama is a complete no-limits fallacy character with no low showings, he doesn't feel threatened. Go after shit characters that on paper don't stand a chance to attempt to mid-air backflip kick a knife into the heart of his enemies.
Basically, very weasel like.
Edit: there we go. I swear that post wasn't there when I made this post. As always, I am a Carver expert
Originally posted by carver9
So you really think I am this type of person?
I don't think you're that type of person. You're not clever or competent enough to come up with that in a billion years. Clearly Someone is coaching you.
Originally posted by Delta1938
Carter, is preparing for this why you're not addressing DarkSaint's question in the topic you bumped?
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Not really, no.And why isn't power scaling suddenly not allowed?
Frankenstein has beaten Superman, as per your quote. He did it without weakness exploitation. So he MUST be stronger, or faster, or more durable.... Otherwise, you're literally arguing that a weaker character beats a stronger character without context.
Unless of course, Superman/Flash/WW weren't going all out?
In THAT case, you cannot honestly say Frankenstein/Cheetah etc are on their level, or greater than them 🙂
Can't have it both ways. Either they're better than the heroes I named (which gives me their feats) or they're not, in which case you're putting Saitama up against slow/weak meta's 😂