MLK Legacy ruined?

Started by shiv3 pages

I'm old enough to remember when people used and reused, processed and transfered primitive recording media.

I know about everything else, especially the cheating and hating of gays, but not the rape.

If the rape is true, that’s ****ing disgusting.

So, when do we rename all the streets and buildings with this guys name on them?

Yes, even Abraham Lincoln is not the saint that many people have made him out to be. MLK was overall a good person though... and he was a republican, like Lincoln. 🙂

I'm sure some places have statues of MLK too, when have leftists scheduled the requisite ripping down of said statues?!

Oh shit isn't there a bust of the guy in the White House?

So would a sledgehammer be good to use on it?

Originally posted by Surtur
I'm sure some places have statues of MLK too, when have leftists scheduled the requisite ripping down of said statues?!

Oh shit isn't there a bust of the guy in the White House?

So would a sledgehammer be good to use on it?

LOL. I think we both know that'll never happen, Surt.

Originally posted by Surtur
So, when do we rename all the streets and buildings with this guys name on them?

I would think MLK would not be against this.. seeing as how most streets named after him are NOT IN BEST PARTS OF TOWN!!!!!

Funny that.

Oh and the best part is this info comes from the FBI and you know how the left feels about that organization these days...it can do no wrong 🙂

I'm barely bothered by the extra-marital affairs, and I'd say this about anyone. Part of our understanding of monogamy is socially constructed tbh, and society pressures people to buy into a certain set of ideals about what romance should be. This pressure was even more extreme during King's day, and forces people who are more open romantically/sexually to hide themselves for the sake of companionship. While, sure, I don't want you hurting someone emotionally, I feel like our outdated concept of romantic ownership causes this pain. We need to cut each other some slack, and understand that human love manifests in far more complex ways than "I'll love you and only you forever cuz the wedding industry and popular media told me so. dur"

It certainly doesn't mean you're a bad person. Neither does joking about leading a legion of pussy eaters. The anti-LGBT thing, meh. He seemed more ignorant on it in the transcript with the gay kid, rather than anti-LGBT, and King gives a pretty enlightened response for that time period. I feel like he would have evolved with everyone else as the LGBT rights movement progressed. He's dead so there's no guarantees, but his wife and multiple kids are pro-LGBT. It at least leads one to believe he'd have gotten there too.

Now, if the rape thing was true. Yeah, that gets into "holy shit dude" territory.

Originally posted by StyleTime
I'm barely bothered by the extra-marital affairs, and I'd say this about anyone. Part of our understanding of monogamy is socially constructed tbh, and society pressures people who wouldn't otherwise choose that into a unfortunate situation where you must hide who you are to find companionship. This pressure was even more extreme during King's day. While, sure, I don't want you hurting someone emotionally, I feel like our concept of romantic ownership is the cause of this. We need to cut each other some slack, and understand that human love manifests in far more complex ways than "I'll love you and only you forever dur"

It certainly doesn't mean you're a bad person. Neither does joking about leading a legion of pussy eaters. The anti-LGBT, meh. He seemed more ignorant on it, rather than anti-LGBT, and King gives a pretty enlightened response for that time period. I feel like he would have evolved with everyone else as the LGBT rights movement progressed. He's dead so there's no guarantees, but his wife and multiple kids are pro-LGBT. It at least leads one to believe he'd have gotten there too.

Now, if the rape thing was true. Yeah, that gets into "holy shit dude" territory.

Excellent post.

Originally posted by StyleTime
I'm barely bothered by the extra-marital affairs, and I'd say this about anyone. Part of our understanding of monogamy is socially constructed tbh, and society pressures people to buy into a certain set of ideals about what romance should be. This pressure was even more extreme during King's day, and forces people who are more open romantically/sexually to hide themselves for the sake of companionship. While, sure, I don't want you hurting someone emotionally, I feel like our outdated concept of romantic ownership causes this pain. We need to cut each other some slack, and understand that human love manifests in far more complex ways than "I'll love you and only you forever cuz the wedding industry and popular media told me so. dur"

It certainly doesn't mean you're a bad person. Neither does joking about leading a legion of pussy eaters. The anti-LGBT thing, meh. He seemed more ignorant on it in the transcript with the gay kid, rather than anti-LGBT, and King gives a pretty enlightened response for that time period. I feel like he would have evolved with everyone else as the LGBT rights movement progressed. He's dead so there's no guarantees, but his wife and multiple kids are pro-LGBT. It at least leads one to believe he'd have gotten there too.

Now, if the rape thing was true. Yeah, that gets into "holy shit dude" territory.

Interesting, because I'd have knocked his teeth out the back of his skull with a baseball bat if he cheated on me, and doing it does make him a bad person. 👆

And just so we're clear, I fully support polyamory and in fact plan to open my relationship with my boyfriend when we're no longer living in different countries. 👆

But if a man or women went behind my back and phucked around, breaking my trust, I'd beat them to within an inch of their life or more and would be fully justified in doing so. 👆

The law wouldn't see it as so, but that's because the law is wrong. 👆

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Excellent post.
Bruh what is that sig. haermm

Originally posted by NemeBro
Interesting, because I'd have knocked his teeth out the back of his skull with a baseball bat if he cheated on me, and doing it does make him a bad person. 👆

And just so we're clear, I fully support polyamory and in fact plan to open my relationship with my boyfriend when we're no longer living in different countries. 👆

But if a man or women went behind my back and phucked around, breaking my trust, I'd beat them to within an inch of their life or more and would be fully justified in doing so. 👆

The law wouldn't see it as so, but that's because the law is wrong. 👆


Dude, what if your boyfriend is a better fighter than you and engages you before you pick up the bat?

Disappointed to hear he was gay. It is what it is

Originally posted by StyleTime
Dude, what if your boyfriend is a better fighter than you
No one is a better fighter than me. 👇

Originally posted by NemeBro
No one is a better fighter than me. 👇

Rogue Jedi is. He could beat Robtard with one arm tied behind his back.

And his dad can beat up your dad, too.

Originally posted by Stringer
Disappointed to hear he was gay. It is what it is

Confirmed Racist Homophobic.


🤣

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Confirmed Racist Homophobic.


🤣 [/B]

I guess I have a new stalker. Hey Fly 🙂

Well your creepy smiles are just taking all the fun out of it.

😊