Originally posted by Putinbot1
O.K. it's in the daily wire, so we don't know context or reasons or if it's true yet. And if it is, what it means. Nice it will mean the whole report needs reinvestigating perhaps? Perhaps the next investigator will discover what the destroyed boxes were. 🙂
Actually we do know this is true because the full transcripts were released. It is not as if the Daily Wire is saying "someone showed us a transcript, trust us". They are going off of things anyone can read. You can argue we don't know why this was done, but it was done.
Speaking of the reason it was done...it is true we do not know why. However, what also cannot be denied is that the edits have the side effect painting a situation that was not nefarious as nefarious.
Originally posted by SurturFair enough, so what's the legality of it?
Actually we do know this is true because the full transcripts were released. It is not as if the Daily Wire is saying "someone showed us a transcript, trust us". They are going off of things anyone can read. You can argue we don't know why this was done, but it was done.Speaking of the reason it was done...it is true we do not know why. However, what also cannot be denied is that the edits have the side effect painting a situation that was not nefarious as nefarious.
Originally posted by Putinbot1
O.K. it's in the daily wire, so we don't know context or reasons or if it's true yet. And if it is, what it means. Nice it will mean the whole report needs reinvestigating perhaps? Perhaps the next investigator will discover what the destroyed boxes were. 🙂
The Dailywire is basically just an extension of Brietbart at this point