Thor does that to Godzilla.
Originally posted by ares834
Yes and no. As your link points out, temperature is the "kinetic energy of [a substance's] molecules". If we want to get even more technical, heat is actually the energy transfer due to a temperature differential.
Substance in this case being Thor though right?
And energy transfer to Thor right?
Im not a physicist, but seems to me a lot of energy is involved. And thats assuming it was “only” the heat of the star Thor took. Eitri actually stayed full force of the star.
That said Im pretty sure even “just” taking the full heat and radiation of a star is a ridiculous feat.
Originally posted by Tzeentch
I was referring to physical attacks as it seemed obvious at the time of posting (and now) that the AOE attack wouldn't do shit to Thor. And I should believe that it packed enough of a punch to hurt Thor based on?
It's a nuke, what feat does Thor have of enduring such a weapon?
Again, enduring the radiation of a star doesn't mean he can withstand the shockwave/kinetic impact of a nuke.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
It's a nuke, what feat does Thor have of enduring such a weapon?Again, enduring the radiation of a star doesn't mean he can withstand the shockwave/kinetic impact of a nuke.
Im sure the focused beam of the suns full heat packed a punch behind it.
Dont forget the Slovakia explosion as well, or his ship being blown up by the Power Stone.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
Im sure the focused beam of the suns full heat packed a punch behind it.Dont forget the Slovakia explosion as well, or his ship being blown up by the Power Stone.
Don't think so. For kinetic energy to br carried mass needs to be in motion.
That's why a nuke packs no kinetic energy in space, as there is no atmosphere/matter to be displaced.
None of those feats is nearly as powerfull as a point blank nuclear explosion.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Don't think so. For kinetic energy to br carried mass needs to be in motion.That's why a nuke packs no kinetic energy in space, as there is no atmosphere/matter to be displaced.
None of those feats is nearly as powerfull as a [B]point blank
nuclear explosion. [/B]
You don’t know anything about nuclear explosions
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Don't think so. For kinetic energy to br carried mass needs to be in motion.
So theres no kinetic energy behind Iron Mans repulsor blasts then?
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
That's why a nuke packs no kinetic energy in space, as there is no atmosphere/matter to be displaced.
No no, a Nuke definitely packs kinetic energy in space.
Its like saying the Sun has no Force because its in space.
If you get hit in space it will still hurt you. The kinetic energy comes from the initial explosion/force generated. how do you think space shuttles fly in space?
Originally posted by Josh_AlexanderNone of those feats is nearly as powerfull as a [B]point blank
nuclear explosion. [/B]
Pretty sure a city vapoursing explosion does.