Originally posted by Robtard
Literally what you did, you took a stance, a shitty one at that and then when even Trump didn't support it, you backpedaled, sport.
If Trump supported it I still truly wouldn't want it, but nice try dude. Keep pushing this. It's the hill to die on.
As I said, your cheerleader will be here shortly 🙂
So yeah, you got nothing and are doing your empty posturing routine. Expected.
Trump seemingly and strangely going soft on Iran here made me remember that when the Dem wins in 2020 and the Reps attack say Biden or Warren or Buttigieg for being too soft on North Korea (like they did with Obama), all the Dems have to do is pull out Trump's love affair notes with his pal Kimmy. Love it.
Originally posted by Robtard
So yeah, you got nothing and are doing your empty posturing routine. Expected.Trump seemingly and strangely going soft on Iran here made me remember that when the Dem wins in 2020 and the Reps attack say Biden or Warren or Buttigieg for being too soft on North Korea (like they did with Obama), all the Dems have to do is pull out Trump's love affair notes with his pal Kimmy. Love it.
^No self awareness. Jesus.
Murdering innocent people (like in your suggestion) over a drone is not what I want him to do, so not going ape-shit and attacking is a good move out of him. I hope he sticks to his guns when warhawks around him like Bolton urge immediate military action.
First find out why Iran attacked the drone and go from there.
Originally posted by Robtard👆 Yup Trump is saner than most of his supporters. Which is scary! 😂
Murdering innocent people (like in your suggestion) over a drone is not what I want him to do, so not going ape-shit and attacking is a good move out of him.First find out why Iran attacked the drone and go from there.
Originally posted by Robtard
Murdering innocent people (like in your suggestion) over a drone is not what I want him to do, so not going ape-shit and attacking is a good move out of him. I hope he sticks to his guns when warhawks around him like Bolton urge immediate military action.First find out why Iran attacked the drone and go from there.
If it's a good move, why'd you have to talk shit about him over it? Lol.
Originally posted by Robtard
Considering I said not attacking was a good move out of Trump (that's praise), what exactly are you referring to, quote it and we can discuss.
You said he's going soft on Iran. And dude no lets not get into a debate on how using the term "soft" wasn't implying something negative.
I said: "Trump seemingly and strangely going soft on Iran here..." -me
Which is noting that considering it's Iran, Trump's soft approach is strange, but I added that it's a good thing this time. We only lost a drone, let's figure out why before going hell-and-fury rants.
You're overreacting to my use of the word "soft" here, buddy.
Originally posted by SurturIran is acting increasingly belligerent since Trump backed out of the nuclear agreement. So yes. But honestly the bottom line is a war is going to be bad for us so we should avoid it. NK, Russia and China are all just as obstinate as Iran is yet we know the aftermath of a war with any of these countries isn't worth it. For whatever reason, some people seem less convinced that a war with Iran isn't worth it. Probably cause they aren't a nuclear power yet. Which pretty much explains perfectly why they want so badly to go nuclear.
And does Iran need to take any responsibility at all for what is going on?
Originally posted by mike brown
Iran is acting increasingly belligerent since Trump backed out of the nuclear agreement. So yes. But honestly the bottom line is a war is going to be bad for us so we should avoid it. NK, Russia and China are all just as obstinate as Iran is yet we know the aftermath of a war with any of these countries isn't worth it. For whatever reason, some people seem less convinced that a war with Iran isn't worth it. Probably cause they aren't a nuclear power yet. Which pretty much explains perfectly why they want so badly to go nuclear.
So basically going to war with Iran is this
NYT is claiming Trump approved a strike on Iran and then called it off once the planes were in the air.
And they had no issues with the NYT publishing that information. So the strategy seems clear: let Iran know how close they came to retaliation. It might make them rethink future actions.
On the other hand it could backfire and just make Iran think Trump would never go through with anything.