Why does Harriet Tubman deserve to replace Andrew Jackson?

Started by Surtur9 pages

Originally posted by Raptor22
iirc they kind of did. a group wrote a letter (along with a list of names) to the treasury department asking if they could place a historical female figure on one of the bills in 2020 to honor the 100 year anniversary of suffrage. The secretary of the treasury thought it would be a good idea too.

An online poll was then held and Tubman replacing Jackson won the vote.

I dont know the details of the poll or what the options to choose from were but Id be fine with an official national vote.

Do u think thats a vote Andrew Jackson would win over Tubman? And if not, do u think there would be no outrage from the other side if tubman won?

What am i talking about. Im sure everyone would be fine with it. After all-

I cant see any reason why any adult would take issue with letting the people decide

We need an official vote, and like I said: no adult would be dumb enough to not be okay with it. Good post, I admire your ability to consistent.

Originally posted by Surtur
We need an official vote, and like I said: no adult would be dumb enough to not be okay with it. Good post, I admire your ability to consistent.
The only thing about a vote like this is we risk that earthlike Planet the Orville visited or that episode of Black Mirror where votes rule on all minor things. Up I mean thumbs up

Okay, then no harriet tubman on currency. Move on.

Originally posted by Surtur
We need an official vote, and like I said: no adult would be dumb enough to not be okay with it. Good post.
i cant tell if u think it was a good post or if u r being sarcastic. I thought it sincere until i noticed Putin liked my post too.

Now im thinking I actually hope ur being sarcastic. iirc my church studies correct, u 2 agreeing on something is the first sign of the biblical apocalypse. And since my post would be the catalyst for ur agreement im pretty sure that would make me the anti-christ, and i dont think im ready for that kind of responsibility yet. 😄

Originally posted by Raptor22
i cant tell if u think it was a good post or if u r being sarcastic. I thought it sincere until i noticed Putin liked my post too.

Now im thinking I actually hope ur being sarcastic. iirc my church studies correct, u 2 agreeing on something is the first sign of the biblical apocalypse. And since my post would be the catalyst for ur agreement im pretty sure that would make me the anti-christ, and i dont think im ready for that kind of responsibility yet. 😄

Bro your post was directed at me, as long as you weren't 100% agreeing with me you had a good chance on PB agreeing with you lol.

If I said oxygen was the bee's knee's the kid would suffocate on sheer principle.

Originally posted by Raptor22
i cant tell if u think it was a good post or if u r being sarcastic. I thought it sincere until i noticed Putin liked my post too.

Now im thinking I actually hope ur being sarcastic. iirc my church studies correct, u 2 agreeing on something is the first sign of the biblical apocalypse. And since my post would be the catalyst for ur agreement im pretty sure that would make me the anti-christ, and i dont think im ready for that kind of responsibility yet. 😄

😂 up again! And Surt good try, but, No!