Alabama woman charged in fetal death, her shooter goes free

Started by Surtur3 pages

Alabama woman charged in fetal death, her shooter goes free

Alabama woman charged in fetal death, her shooter goes free

So what do people think of this situation? Was the right call made?

The mother charged with manslaughter started the fight it looks like while the person who shot her did it only in self-defense. Yes, the mother should be charged with manslaughter I agree with that decision 100%. She deliberately chose to do something that she should've known would've endangered the life of the unborn child. When a woman is pregant she has a responsibility to not do things that directly endanger the child's life.

Oh Alabama.

^Oh dipshit.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
^Oh dipshit.
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
F*** big government, f*** Common Core, f*** forced vaccinations, f***abortions, f*** gun registration, f*** open borders, f*** globalism and f*** people who support all of these while calling themselves "right-wingers."

Would you kiss Jesus with that mouth?

You just oooze the love of Christ, don't you? 🙂

^ 🙄

Originally posted by Robtard
Oh Alabama.

So do you disagree with the decision to charge the mother?

If it was truly self defense then it sounds like the right call.

Originally posted by Surtur
So do you disagree with the decision to charge the mother?

No, I'm fine with that, if you're 5 months pregnant you shouldn't initiate a fist fight (except in self defense), that's just reckless behavior.

But letting the person who pulled out and shot a gun completely off, ya, that's shit.

Originally posted by Robtard
No, I'm fine with that, if you're 5 months pregnant you shouldn't initiate a fist fight (except in self defense), that's just reckless behavior.

But letting the person who pulled out and shot a gun completely off, ya, that's shit.

If it was self-defense, the shooter is not guilty of breaking the law.

In Canada and the UK, they have like-for-like laws. You can't just use lethal force if someone punches you. Some places in the US might have that, too.

you attack someone, get ready to die

Originally posted by gold slorg
you attack someone, get ready to die

Exactly. People have no right to just go around starting fights with people and the victim has no idea what the person attacking him or her is capable of or how far the attacker intends to go in his/her attack.

There is no time when a fight starts to stop and ponder "hmmm... I wonder if this person just means to punch me a couple of times or to do severe bodily harm to me or maybe even intends to kill me. I need to take the time to figure it out so I make sure to use the proper level of response. " LOL.

Snowflakes who live in California like Robbie though live in fantasyland and think guns are just inherently evil and should never be used no matter the circumstances. It's all that damn leftist brainwashing they've been subjected to throughout their sad pathetic lives. They don't live in actual reality. Anyone who uses a gun is unjustified in doing so and is automatically in the wrong in his and most other leftists' delusional minds. Even if that person is a cop who happens to shoot someone of the wrong skin color even when the cop is justified in doing so.

Originally posted by Robtard
No, I'm fine with that, if you're 5 months pregnant you shouldn't initiate a fist fight (except in self defense), that's just reckless behavior.

But letting the person who pulled out and shot a gun completely off, ya, that's shit.

It seems to have been self defense. What should be done to the person?

Originally posted by dadudemon
If it was self-defense, the shooter is not guilty of breaking the law.

In Canada and the UK, they have like-for-like laws. You can't just use lethal force if someone punches you. Some places in the US might have that, too.

That's my issue with the ruling in Alabama, seems any threat = lethal use of force retaliation

Our police officers have to be wary of using adequate force according to the threat in question. eg You don't shoot an 80yo woman because she's attacking you with her purse, but a 35yo man with a bat, sure.

This case smells of the case in Florida with George Zimmerman. Though at least this shooter didn't initiate the fight like Zimmerman did, so they have that going for them.

Originally posted by Surtur
It seems to have been self defense. What should be done to the person?

Pregnant woman attacks me with her fist, I'd slap her hard, if that wasn't enough, submission.

It depends on how bad the fight was.

my health is legit so bad i would shoot a 70-yo grandpa if he attacked me lol, no regrets

The right decision was absolutely made in this case. I'm just glad that Robbie wasn't on the jury. 👆

Originally posted by gold slorg
my health is legit so bad i would shoot a 70-yo grandpa if he attacked me lol, no regrets

That's gangsta

Originally posted by Robtard
This case smells of the case in Florida with George Zimmerman. Though at least this shooter didn't initiate the fight like Zimmerman did, so they have that going for them.

Was the woman on top of the shooter, doing the MMA-style ground and pound like Martin was on Zimmerman?

If so, yeah, that would change this story a lot and she should have been shot and the shooter is innocent.