Climate Change: .01% is 'Man-made' According to Results Duplicated Study

Originally posted by Robtard
The loudest most retarded voices get heard. I don't buy the "we're gonna die tomorrow" any more than I buy "it's a Chinese hoax".

But I can't ignore the negative visible signs that pollution causes; these are intertwined to me, we keep tackling pollution, we will help the environment and if that has the positive effect of scaling back negative changes in our climate, perfect. If not, we clean up and we still end up with cleaner air, water and food. I don't want to live like people do in Beijing China or Los Angeles before regulations cleaned it up.

Well my thing is, if there are still real problems to tackle those problems are harmed by overhyping this.

We will not fix these problems by being silly shitheads screaming about the end of the world.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
It indicates the emission may be less than first thought, this has nothing to do with modern warming estimates. It just indicates perhaps less greenhouse gases are needed to produce the modern trends being experienced. It would also be foolish to throw away past meta data based on hundreds of studies due to two. I don't even know who funded these. Much more research is needed. What we do know is temperatures and water levels are going up, Ice caps are melting and these correlate to increased Greenhouse gases.

Are you really spouting whole “the ice caps are melting!”

Originally posted by Surtur
Well my thing is, if there are still real problems to tackle those problems are harmed by overhyping this.

We will not fix these problems by being silly shitheads screaming about the end of the world.

Over-hyping is still better than the "it's not happening at all" approach, since you're comparing.

If you had minor skin cancer, would you prefer your doctor say: "OMG, you're gonna die tomorrow if you don't start treatment today" or "You're fine, it's probably just a hoax, no need to worry at all"? Exactly, Surt.

People like Rush Limbaugh saying "God is taking care of the planet, so I'm not worried" is a complete cop-out.

Originally posted by Robtard
Over-hyping is still better than the "it's not happening at all" approach, since you're comparing.

If you had minor skin cancer, would you prefer your doctor say: "OMG, you're gonna die tomorrow if you don't start treatment today" or "You're fine, it's probably just a hoax, no need to worry at all"? Exactly, Surt.

People like Rush Limbaugh saying "God is taking care of the planet, so I'm not worried" is a complete cop-out.

Umm no, over hyping is no better than denying it. Don't try to die on this hill bro lol. But you will, won't you? I predict you will not be able to help yourself.

^ Standard Surt.

Rob you are virtue singaling because your just pointing fingers without offering hard solutions.

You are not offering any real solutions. Because the solutions are very hard.

Co2 isnt the problem its methane that is the problem.

Why dont we think about cutting down on how much beef people consume, and the amount of cows on the planet.

Population control, another hard solution.

How about we cut down on the almond production in California that takes trillions of gallons of fresh water to make?

I have more hard solutions, but the whole "Rush said" is just interst talk to keep your keyboard busy to kill time at work and make people feel bad.

Originally posted by Robtard
^ Standard Surt.

Kiddo, "you're gonna die tomorrow!" is no better than "this shit is no bigge".

I can't see how an adult needs to be told this. You feeling okay?

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Rob you are virtue singaling because your just pointing fingers without offering hard solutions.

This is an empty post that directly ignores what I said on the previous page. You just wanted to say something that you thought sounded thoughtful to join in the conversation, like Ivanka at the G20 summit.

SO you half quote me and then throw a zinger in at the end to be mature about things.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
SO you half quote me and then throw a zinger in at the end to be mature about things.

Kinda the same shit Jim Acosta pulled with Gorka.

Originally posted by Surtur
Kiddo, "you're gonna die tomorrow!" is no better than "this shit is no bigge".

I can't see how an adult needs to be told this. You feeling okay?

In regards to something potentially harmful, no, the former is more sensible as while it's a silly exaggeration, it still could promote a response that could lead to a beneficial solution, while the later promotes complete inaction which could lead to harm and or death.

You're trying to equalization again, aka the Standard Surt.

Originally posted by Robtard
In regards to something potentially harmful, no, the former is more sensible as while it's a silly exaggeration, it still could promote a response that could lead to a beneficial solution, while the later promotes complete inaction which could lead to harm and or death.

You're trying to equalization again, aka the Standard Surt.

Nope telling a person they're gonna die when it's not the case is no better.

Do better than your classic Rob BS.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
SO you half quote me and then throw a zinger in at the end to be mature about things.

When I quoted you, that's all you had written. You added more later.

I believe Rob, dude has never spouted bullshit so why would he start now?

Giggle.

Originally posted by Surtur
Nope telling a person they're gonna die when it's not the case is no better.

Do better than your classic Rob BS.

In the example I used, skin cancer can be fatal. Look it up.

Nope, over exaggerating is no better than doing the opposite. Did you wanna keep pushing this till a pal of yours comes and agrees with you? It's allowed 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard
When I quoted you, that's all you had written. You added more later.

Gotcha, so even though that might be true, and now that you have had the opportnuity to read it, you just focus on the orgional post which was not complete.

Originally posted by Surtur
Nope, over exaggerating is no better than doing the opposite. Did you wanna keep pushing this till a pal of yours comes and agrees with you? It's allowed 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard

If you had minor skin cancer, would you prefer your doctor say: "OMG, you're gonna die tomorrow if you don't start treatment today" or "You're fine, it's probably just a hoax, no need to worry at all"? Exactly, Surt.

Here, I'll even answer first so you can't dodge that way: I'd choose being told the "OMG, you're gonna die tomorrow if you don't start treatment today". Worst case, I still have cancer, best case, I get ahead of a potentially fatal cancer.

Originally posted by Robtard
Then answer the question instead of dodging. Two choices, which is it?

Here, I'll even answer first so you can't dodge that way: I'd choose being told the "OMG, you're gonna die tomorrow if you don't start treatment today". Worst case, I still have cancer, best case, I get ahead of a potentially fatal cancer.

Did you just whine about someone else dodging a question?

Lol lets explore this: have you ever dodged a question?

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Rob you are virtue singaling because your just pointing fingers without offering hard solutions.

You are not offering any real solutions. Because the solutions are very hard.

Co2 isnt the problem its methane that is the problem.

Why dont we think about cutting down on how much beef people consume, and the amount of cows on the planet.

Population control, another hard solution.

How about we cut down on the almond production in California that takes trillions of gallons of fresh water to make?

I have more hard solutions, but the whole "Rush said" is just interst talk to keep your keyboard busy to kill time at work and make people feel bad.

^?