Originally posted by Silent Master
Maybe the manaegr is lying to protect Jussie.
Again though, why call at all? Why not have Jussie call?
Like, it would have made literally zero difference in the outcome to Jussie. All this secrecy does is protect the manager's involvement.
Which, imo, is an odd thing here.
Originally posted by Robtard
CDTM is making valid points in regards to the manager, it's fine if you don't agree, but do you have no counter of value so you response with trolling?
He's not making a single valid point in regards to Jussie not knowing. I absolutely think the manager was involved too though.
Originally posted by cdtm
Again though, why call at all? Why not have Jussie call?Like, it would have made literally zero difference in the outcome to Jussie. All this secrecy does is protect the manager's involvement.
Which, imo, is an odd thing here.
Because finding out Jussie supposedly didn't want to call at first makes the story more dramatic and adds credibility to the accusations. see, it's working with you.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Because finding out Jussie supposedly didn't want to call at first makes the story more dramatic and adds credibility to the accusations. see, it's working with you.
If it was public information, certainly possible.
Sealed info, that only just got released though? (Plus, the manager himself hasn't used that info for sympathy, has he? No one has.)
Originally posted by cdtm
If it was public information, certainly possible.Sealed info, that only just got released though? (Plus, the manager himself hasn't used that info for sympathy, has he? No one has.)
Yes and they could easily have thought that it would make the accusations more creditable to the police and prosecutors. and if it got released, to the public.
This thread is proof that they were right.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Yes and they could easily have thought that it would make the accusations more creditable to the police and prosecutors. and if it got released, to the public.This thread is proof that they were right.
Sure, it's possible. Likely?
Because my theory isn't all that radical, really. The manager has:
1. Motive. Jussie gets paid more, he gets paid more.
2. Means. If he has power of attorney, he could pay the brothers in Jussies name.
3. Opportunity. He probably knows Jussie well enough, that setting up an ambush would be easy. The brothers may well have been told it was a publicity stunt, and the training could have been real. Or, who know, maybe there was a planned lynching on the show, and the brothers thought this was related.to that, at Jussie's request (According to the manager).
And from the manager's perspective, you'd want Jussie kept in the dark, so his act is as convincing as possible. If he was in on it, there's a chance he could give the game away (Even if he is an actor).
So, he could have rationalized this whole debacle as in his clients best interests.
Now, I'm not saying this is definitely what happened, but occams razor, it makes more sense then the theory that Jussie himself masterminded this thing, and failed it spectacularly in every way. None of his actions really made sense to me, but they would make sense if he legitimately thought he was assaulted, and discovered his true story just doesn't add up under scrutiny.
Originally posted by cdtm
Sure, it's possible. Likely?Because my theory isn't all that radical, really. The manager has:
1. Motive. Jussie gets paid more, he gets paid more.
2. Means. If he has power of attorney, he could pay the brothers in Jussies name.
3. Opportunity. He probably knows Jussie well enough, that setting up an ambush would be easy. The brothers may well have been told it was a publicity stunt, and the training could have been real. Or, who know, maybe there was a planned lynching on the show, and the brothers thought this was related.to that, at Jussie's request (According to the manager).
And from the manager's perspective, you'd want Jussie kept in the dark, so his act is as convincing as possible. If he was in on it, there's a chance he could give the game away (Even if he is an actor).
So, he could have rationalized this whole debacle as in his clients best interests.
Now, I'm not saying this is definitely what happened, but occams razor, it makes more sense then the theory that Jussie himself masterminded this thing, and failed it spectacularly in every way. None of his actions really made sense to me, but they would make sense if he legitimately thought he was assaulted, and discovered his true story just doesn't add up under scrutiny.
Other than speculation, what tangible proof do you have that Jussie is innocent?