Originally posted by Insane Titan
Tbh the incel stuff is pretty much a excuse for people to use to deflect the criticism from the movie for it being piss poor imo. It’s got to the point you can’t called a movie poor because you’re labelled racist, fascist , homophobic or whatever other label they want to throw at you . I know plenty of guys, mates from my gym etc myself included who thought the movie was poor and it’s pretty clear the Feminist /SJW agenda was getting pushed in that movie trying to that most if not all male characters are buffoons and useless. He’ll just look at the same thing happening In terminator and Bond. I’m all for balance/equality etc but they way all this is happening on such a lefty agenda is destroying great francises.
👆
Calling people "Incels" is a Leftist method of coercing/intimidating people into silence and not exercising their Freedom Of Speech.
I ignore that retarded-horsesh|t.
Yes, the boycott will likely work nicely - since those movies do suck and the OP is most likely an Incel. 😆
Originally posted by -Pr-
I'm sure if The Rise of Skywalker under-performs, Disney will have a plethora of excuses rather than admit that it just wasn't as good as it should have been. Like Last Jedi, people will blame the Russians or the Incels or something similar rather than own up to the very real problems that end up costing Disney the allmighty dollar they love so much.
👆
I wonder if Liberals think Russians and Incels are the same thing. 😆
Originally posted by Robtard
If people didn't mass-attack these movies with comments of "feminist agenda!", "political correctness ruins...", "Social Justice strikes again!" and similar comments, but instead critiqued the films fairly for their actual flaws, then Disney and other movie studios would not have that ammo to fire back with.
Disney doesn't have ammo to fire back with anything - that's just an illusion - and they're well on their way to becoming bankrupt. 🙂
Re: Re: Angry Man boycotts...
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
As I've mentioned in other threads before, Star Wars is now dead to me. It died when Lucas sold Lusafilm to Disney. I knew once that happened that eventually it would lead to sjw man-bashing feminist crap being injected into the franchise and I was proven right with the Last Jedi which I didn't personally see but have heard all the criticisms it received. The only SW films that exist to me or ever will exist are episodes 1-6 which I have all on blu-ray.I'm sure this new upcoming will flop though going by how the true SW fans were so upset over The Last Jedi.
👆
I didn't like The Force Awakens, either. Garbage.
Re: Re: Re: Angry Man boycotts...
Originally posted by NemeBro
😂Anyway, TFA was soulless and dull and TLJ kind of sucked cock. A lot of the criticisms about the film are stupid and irrelevant garbage or just overly focused on one aspect (people latch onto Holdo as being this dumb b!tch while ignoring that Poe's role in that entire stupid section of the film was just as stupid) and people that politicize their criticism of the film (It's just SJW bullshit!) often don't have anything intelligent or interesting to say about the film's actual merits or demerits. When you attack what you believe to be the intent behind any given choice in a film, you're not actually criticizing the film, you're just throwing an ad hominem at the creators. It's boring babyrage.
Oh, and anyone who thinks the next film will flop is honestly delusional.
Nah - Solo flopped and the damage from The Last Jedi fallout has been done - so flopping is still in the realm of possibility - especially with the same type of boycotting that occurred during Solo.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
Id be seriously shocked if it didnt hit a billion.But with Palpatine returning and the marketing tool of this being the closure of the 9 episode Skywalker saga, im guessing like 1.5bill.
Dont think it will reach Force Awakens numbers though because that hype is just gone.
I'm sure it'll hit a billion pennies.
And true Star Wars fans are not going to be enthusiastic for "the return of Palpatine" - since such a thing contradicts Anakin fulfilling the Prophecy Of The Chosen One by destroying Palpatine and the Sith in Return Of The Jedi.
Disney is scared and desperate and pulled Palpatine out of it's ass to try and salvage this mentally-retarded dumpster fire of a "trilogy".
Very true that the hype is gone - Star Wars is dead.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Angry Man boycotts...
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
I didn't have to see the full film in its entirety with my own eyes to understand it was infested with a bunch of sjw feminist crap. I saw tons of clips online and many die hard SW fans criticizing it on YouTube.I saw that b*tch Kathleen Kennedy going around proclaiming "the force is female!!" lmao
It's pretty obvious the film was pushing typical leftist, feminist, man-hating BS.
FFS, the opening title sequence's first words were "RESIST! RESIST! RESIST!" An obvious homage to the immature little crybaby #resistance movement. From what I understrand, the head imperial officer also had red hair lol. I mean, could it be any more obvious than that that the filmakers had an obvious left-wing agenda?
👆
I literally bought the Disney "star wars" DVDs for PENNIES at Good Will - just so I could physically-shit all over them.
Disney "star wars" merchandise makes for a good toilet.
Speaking on angry manbaby rants and fragile masculinity, the Thor 4 thread is a prime example.