Ozymandias vs. Bullseye

Originally posted by Silent Master
That isn't the question I asked, I asked if the avoided multiple bullets feat you mentioned proved Ozy has superhuman level reactions and perceptions.

So, does it?

Your question is irrelevant to this discussion.

Originally posted by h1a8
Your question is irrelevant to this discussion.

My question is about a feat you used in this discussion, that makes it relevant.

Now, does the avoided multiple bullets feat you mentioned prove Ozy has superhuman level reactions and perceptions?

Originally posted by h1a8
The bullet catching feat does.
In combination with the other scene he saw used his superhuman reflexes and perceptions to avoid getting hit while closing the distance.

He already answered it.

His answer is, In combination with the bullet catch, yes.

Carry on

??

Originally posted by Silent Master
My question is about a feat you used in this discussion, that makes it relevant.

Now, does the avoided multiple bullets feat you mentioned prove Ozy has superhuman level reactions and perceptions?

Your question about the feat is irrelevant. It's possible to ask irrelevant questions to relevant feats.

To be clear, the bullet catching feat proves it. So it's irrelevant to ask if another feat proves it. We only need one feat for proof. The other feat proves that he can track the shots and maneuver to close the distance. Also catching something is significantly harder than just blocking it.

You used the avioded multiple bullets scene as a reflex and perception feat. thus asking what you think the feat proves in very relevant.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You used the avioded multiple bullets scene as a reflex and perception feat. thus asking what you think the feat proves in very relevant.

It's not relevant since Ozy has another feat that proves it.

So Ozy has superhuman reflexes/perceptions and is able to skillfully close the distance. End of story.

You used it as a feat therefore it's relevant

Now answer the question

Originally posted by Silent Master
You used it as a feat therefore it's relevant

Now answer the question

It's not relevant to your question.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You used the avioded multiple bullets scene as a reflex and perception feat. thus asking what you think the feat proves in very relevant.

Ozy has superhuman level reactions and speed due to the bullet catching feat. Ozy can skillfully track a gun barrel while closing the distance due to the other feat.

That's all need to be said. That's the current argument. If you disagree with the current argument then debate.

At this point you are trolling and not contributing anything to who wins here.

You used the feat as proof, that makes it relevant.

Now answer the question.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You used the feat as proof, that makes it relevant.

Now answer the question.

I could use the scene where Aladdin makes a wish as proof to Ozy having superhuman reflexes and reactions. Doesn't matter as long as he has one feat that actually prove it.

If a character has multiple feats supporting something then rebutting one of them doesn't destroy the entire argument.

At this point you are trolling.

So you admit that you lied about what the feat proved?