Weapon H vs. General Eiling (Shaggy Man)

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
Usually?

He does it all the damn time. Even when the character version IS SPECIFIED IN THE THREAD TITLE.

Yet you dont even read the stories. You're like Leo, and use old feats. Btw, I was using General Eliling, too. The guy who casually owned Superman and Orion.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Just as durable?

Huntress' crossbow bolts were sticking in him.

And he also wasn't phased by Orion's Astro Force, which is why I said, at times.

And was stalemated when he went up against a feral fighter.

Referring to Sturmer, of course.

Originally posted by Senor Cage
And he also wasn't phased by Orion's Astro Force, which is why I said, at times.

So his piercing durability sucks. That doesn't bode well against Weapon H.

Strummer did absolutely nothing, TBH. Just BFR him.

Originally posted by Senor Cage
Strummer did absolutely nothing, TBH. Just BFR him.

Whilst stalemating him. Eiling did nothing to him either.

In this fight, Weapon H has metre long claws, far longer than Sturmer's teeth and claws. Just as feral. More tactical. Very likely stronger (haven't seen Sturmer's strength feats lol).

And was unable to put him down, just like Superman said: "He's unstoppable".

But not my point.

Eiling was unable to stop Sturmer either.

Statements also don't count. Superman also said Eiling was invulnerable, but that wasn't true, as Batman and Green Arrow proved.

BTW, looking at the fight, General wasn't just facing off against Strummer. He was going against the ENTIRE league, while Strummer just chewed off his arm. While General was busy fighting Orion, Strummer leapt at SM, and BFR. That's actually looks good for SM, not bad.

https://imgur.com/a/BX2Wwym

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
But not my point.

Eiling was unable to stop Sturmer either.

Statements also don't count. Superman also said Eiling was invulnerable, but that wasn't true, as Batman and Green Arrow proved.

He was manhandling Superman and the entire league. Morrison's JLA. I think that's better than anything WH has done, IMO.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
But not my point.

Eiling was unable to stop Sturmer either.

Statements also don't count. Superman also said Eiling was invulnerable, but that wasn't true, as Batman and Green Arrow proved.

Well, Superman wasn't wrong. They had to BFR to win, and were on the losing end.

Originally posted by Senor Cage
Well, Superman wasn't wrong. They had to BFR to win, and were on the losing end.

He wasn't invulnerable. Batman blew his arm off without any prep.

Sturmer stalemated him. He wasn't able to put him down.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
He wasn't invulnerable. Batman blew his arm off without any prep.

Sturmer stalemated him. He wasn't able to put him down.

I'm not commenting on his invulnerable statement. Eiling's regeneration and adaptation will negate any attack from WH. I'm commenting on his unstoppable comments. The league barely slowed him down.

Originally posted by leonidas
i love watching people try and argue with prep. 😂

wh carves him up long enough for a forum win.

Getting worse with each year.

Just like DC Comics themselves.

Originally posted by Senor Cage
I'm not commenting on his invulnerable statement. Eiling's regeneration and adaptation will negate any attack from WH. I'm commenting on his unstoppable comments. The league barely slowed him down.

I am.

Superman ALSO said that he was invulnerable. You can't pick and choose. In short, statements can be wrong, and are inadmissible.

Sturmer wasn't put down by Eiling. Weapon H is stronger, more tactical, and has better weaponry than Sturmer.

Eiling doesn't have adaptation powers. He regenerates, but Weapon H can put him down for the forum win.

Just my two cents, guys.

"Invulnerable" is a term used quite loosely in comics.

Wendigo was described as invulnerable, too. It's alluding to his regen/immortality, not the durability itself.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
I am.

Superman ALSO said that he was invulnerable. You can't pick and choose. In short, statements can be wrong, and are inadmissible.

Sturmer wasn't put down by Eiling. Weapon H is stronger, more tactical, and has better weaponry than Sturmer.

Eiling doesn't have adaptation powers. He regenerates, but Weapon H can put him down for the forum win.

In this case, he was right. Actions speak louder than words. 😛

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
Getting worse with each year.

Just like DC Comics themselves.

Yep, you are.

Originally posted by Senor Cage
In this case, he was right. Actions speak louder than words. 😛

Yes, and he was stalemated by Sturmer. Actions do indeed speak louder than words.

Rick Flag shot his arm full of holes. Amanda Waller blew his brain out.

Originally posted by Senor Cage
Yep, you are.

People get nastier as they age, it's only natural.

Your DC fanboyism is unnatural, though.

Which didn't do anything to him.