Originally posted by quanchi112
Not peak only you just have to make your case. We will not overlook showings and pretend they did not occur. All evidence is fair game.
Peak performance is standard in the forum rules.
Youre welcome to attempt to lowball Supes (although if you truly believed Thanos to be superior you wouldnt need to). But end of the day you will be focused on Thanos high end combat feats, so I will do the same for Supes.
Originally posted by Darth ThorWe agree on the stips so all showings count. Forum rules have no place in a one on one battlezone but nowhere in the movie versus rules does it state only peak performance.
Peak performance is standard in the forum rules.Youre welcome to attempt to lowball Supes (although if you truly believed Thanos to be superior you wouldnt need to). But end of the day you will be focused on Thanos high end combat feats, so I will do the same for Supes.
All showings count for both. It is the same. This is not selective bias. You wanting to just focus on the minority of his showings truly reveals you have no trust in the character but just a few feats while you ignore the rest. We do not ignore the totality of their showings. Ever. All facts and feats are fair game.
Whatever I trust Nib to recognise lowballing and trolling.
Now for the structure:
I suggest
1) An opening argument each
2) A rebuttal each
3) A conclusion each
None of 1-3 are limited to one post each so take as many posts as you like.
Up to you if you want to add in a rebuttal of the rebuttal as well. As long as were not just needlessly going back and forth for 20pages repeating the same arguments.
Originally posted by Darth ThorArguing about the facts is not trolling while ignoring facts is certainly showing bias. For,at your argument however you want I do not want to clutter up the debate for 20 pages either.
Whatever I trust Nib to recognise lowballing and trolling.Now for the structure:
I suggest
1) An opening argument each
2) A rebuttal each
3) A conclusion each
None of 1-3 are limited to one post each so take as many posts as you like.
Up to you if you want to add in a rebuttal of the rebuttal as well. As long as were not just needlessly going back and forth for 20pages repeating the same arguments.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Arguing about the facts is not trolling while ignoring facts is certainly showing bias.
Dont worry ill be bringing context to your supposed Facts.
I think its pretty clear your entire case is going to depend on lowballing. But its up to you how you want to lose this.
Originally posted by quanchi112
For,at your argument however you want I do not want to clutter up the debate for 20 pages either.
Do you want to add in an extra rebuttal or you good with the above?
Originally posted by Darth ThorNo, I will never once deny superspeed or any feats as facts I will illuminate the totality of his fights not just a few seconds of them. We are free to respond as much as we want but if we ramble on that might hurt our case. Up to us. You format your own argument how you want.
Dont worry ill be bringing context to your supposed Facts.I think its pretty clear your entire case is going to depend on lowballing. But its up to you how you want to lose this.
Do you want to add in an extra rebuttal or you good with the above?
Originally posted by Darth ThorYou know all the pressure is on you and how badly you will try to ignore the totality of his fights and just focus on brief moments while selectively choosing what you believe should displaying bias.
Nah it's all about how you wanna go down. Gaining some respect making as good a case for the underdog here as possible. Or ranting/raving trying to put the character you hate down instead.
Originally posted by quanchi112
You know all the pressure is on you and how badly you will try to ignore the totality of his fights and just focus on brief moments while selectively choosing what you believe should displaying bias.
Lol sure thing.
Like I said your choice. Go down as a man or go down as a troll. Up to you.