Why do Dems not want Voter ID?

Started by quanchi1123 pages

Originally posted by Stringer
Proof?
Who are you?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Who are you?

The poster formerly known as "McLovin"

Originally posted by Robtard
Actually, faster than you think. Just like everyone else, I reserve the right to read or not read whatever I like here, people do this everyday, including yourself. Don't take this as a personal offense, it has nothing to do with you.

And as before, I'm 100% behind Voter ID, just do it fairly for all.

Agreed. 👆

And, topically, so is Sanders. Automatic ID registration, in fact. It was all over the internets, yesterday, as the Democratic propagandizers got to work making sure everyone in the world saw the Sanders got cheers for his suggestion.

So, since it clearly has bipartisan support, what is stopping this from happening? To me, it's a win-win-win. Also, it does not violate my libertarian lean, either.

Here are the issues with discovering the substantial amounts of voter fraud and why some people may not like findings of significant voting fraud:

1. Thousands of voter fraud discovered by this research which directly contradicts the narrative that almost near 0 cases of voter fraud were discovered. Keep in mind that accusations of voter fraud have been thrown by both parties - this is not a jab at leftists, progressives, or Democrats.
2. These findings were not in the left-leaning media because it contradicts 1 and in part supports Trump's point about voter fraud.
3. This clearly indicates that there is a voting fraud issue in the US.
4. This study was using very conservative methods to document findings of voter fraud. Less strict measures would cause the amount of voter fraud to sharply increase by many times - up to millions. This type of potential voter fraud, if using much more loose controls, would indicate a very scary problem - voting fraud is rampant in US Elections. This is a fact that the Cybersecurity and Homeland Security communities have known for over 20 years, now.
5. It is already known that some progressives are quite happy with illegal immigration and trying to influence the election and get more progressive representation at the federal level. This is actually a scary problem and should be addressed:

https://nypost.com/2017/02/16/how-immigration-will-change-the-electoral-power-of-states-trump-needed-to-win-election/

It should also be noted that the 20 largest metropolitan areas also have the highest numbers of illegal immigrants and it is not proportionally represented by immigration patterns. That's an odd outcome. Superficially, you'd think that only border cities would see this but it is not the case. Also, it should be noted that CA would lose 5 house seats if illegal immigrants were not counted in their population. 5.

6. Why was the citizenship question so vehemently blocked on the 2020 Census? It was there, then not, then partially there. So it is odd that this question is being asked but we all know it is so the GOP can point to aliens (legal or illegal) as swaying election results either directly or indirectly.

Of course, I'm talking about legitimately important points...likely no one will care.

Originally posted by Stringer
Proof?

LOL. What would be the point of that? You'd just end-up saying "that source is right-wing therefore it can't be trusted." So no, I won't waste my precious time posting proof for you.

Ask yourself though, why won't states like California (which is filled with illegal aliens) cooperate with Trump's voter fraud investigation unless of course they have something to hide?

Why are dems so opposed to voter id when an id is required for so many other things?

Why are dems opposed to a question on a census asking if that person is an american citizen?

Why are dems so in favor of wide-open borders? Why do they keep demonizing ICE and border patrol who are simply doing their jobs?

All of these things taken together make it obvious to anyone with a functioning brain in their head that dems rely on illegal aliens to win elections. Of course you can deny it all you like and I'm sure you will just don't expect to convince any of us who actually know better. 👆

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
As if making a book about all the money the clintons have stolen from people makes you unqualified to make any assessments of voter fraud?😂

That would mean anyone who has said anything about where trump made his money is unqualified to talk about anything else because he of that😂

Try harder rob

Yeah, w/out double standards those on the left wouldn't have any standards at all.

Originally posted by Robtard
The poster formerly known as "McLovin"

For what was he banned again?