Why was there no conspiracy charges for colluding with Russia?

Why did not a single person get charged for collusion or conspiracy with Russia?

Surely he could have charged one person?

Was his team of goons that incompetent?

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/2/20/17031772/mueller-indictments-grand-jury

3) Rick Gates, a former Trump campaign aide and Manafort’s longtime junior business partner, was indicted on similar charges to Manafort. But in February 2018 he agreed to a plea deal with Mueller’s team, pleading guilty to just one false statements charge and one conspiracy charge.

eat

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Why did not a single person get charged for collusion or conspiracy with Russia?

Surely he could have charged one person?

Was his team of goons that incompetent?

It was because they didn't have any actual evidence to charge anyone with it. And yes, of course they were also incompetent. His team was composed entirely of democrat "never Trumpers" , after all.

Originally posted by cdtm
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/2/20/17031772/mueller-indictments-grand-jury

😂 😂 😂 😂 😂

That doesn’t say he was charged for conspiring with Russia you fcking moron😂

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
eat

So Rick Gates was charged with conspiracy with Russi?

Nah I didn’t think so, unless you can manufacture some fake news somewhere?

the investigation on russian election tampering led to rick gates being charged and convicted of “conspiracy against the united states”. so I guess that means nothing because of your feelings?

Clearly you cannot read the Op and living in fantasy land.

Rick Gates was charged with conspiracy against the United States for financial crimes having nothing to do with 2016 Election.

Prove me wrong👆

That’s what I thought. Both of you are wrong

So I took you up on your offer. To see if I could prove you wrong, Supra.

I found this:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/30/us/politics/special-counsel-indictments.html?_r=0

The charges against Mr. Manafort and Mr. Gates center on a series of criminal allegations related to their lobbying for a pro-Russia government of Ukraine, not to Mr. Trump or the campaign.

Their arrests, indictments, and plea deals were related to them not following the rules about being foreign agents. Not the Trump campaign. This is not a collusion charge against Trump. This is lobbyists not following the absurdly loose lobbying laws.

If even NYTimes is reporting that this has nothing to do with the Trump campaign, there is no case, here.

Good job, thank you for your post

Originally posted by dadudemon
So I took you up on your offer. To see if I could prove you wrong, Supra.

I found this:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/30/us/politics/special-counsel-indictments.html?_r=0

Their arrests, indictments, and plea deals were related to them not following the rules about being foreign agents. Not the Trump campaign. This is not a collusion charge against Trump. This is lobbyists not following the absurdly loose lobbying laws.

If even NYTimes is reporting that this has nothing to do with the Trump campaign, there is no case, here.

Wait wait, hold up. I call f*cking bullshit.

Am I to assume feelings weren't taken into account when you made this post? Tsk tsk.

Definitely few fees.

CTDM once again proves to be a dummy troll

*calls someone else a dummy*

*Repeatedly screws up a four letter acronym*

Originally posted by cdtm
*calls someone else a dummy*

*Repeatedly screws up a four letter acronym*

"Is too!" Is an argument? 😱

Originally posted by cdtm
*calls someone else a dummy*

*Repeatedly screws up a four letter acronym*

Is that all you got shit head?

Originally posted by Surtur

😂

He's been trying so hard lately.

Originally posted by Surtur

See, at least that requires some degree of effort and creativity. I've seen 6 year old kids make better "arguments" (Read: Trolls) on Mirc then Time.