Justice League vs Thanos and The Black Order

Originally posted by Darth Thor
When was DDs skin proven more durable to blunt physical attacks?

The suggestion would be that Superman can go crashing from the sky through a mountain without a scar, bruise or bleed to show for it. Completely undamaged.

I agree his sword had better feats, and that hes stronger than her.

Apples to apples comparison. DD's skin and Superman's were tested on equal conditions. DD skin was proven superior or at least equal.

Well guess what, so can DD. Again, do you have any evidence to suggest Superman's skin is different or superior to DD's?

Originally posted by quanchi112
He had one arm. He still beat her in an unprecedented he used the power stone by holding it whereas it kills or severely hurts most others unless they put it on an intimate object. One arm he tossed her and despite all her power and using it on Thanos he still defeated her when she came back.

Thanos still in his situation assessed it and won. The guy truly is the best. Superman had his gf save his life against Batman.

Conveniently forgetting that she no sold his headbutt and made him shit his pants, eh? Carol > Thanos in strength and durability.

Crying out for help is assessing a situation? You are pathetic.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Apples to apples comparison. DD's skin and Superman's were tested on equal conditions. DD skin was proven superior or at least equal.

Well guess what, so can DD. Again, do you have any evidence to suggest Superman's skin is different or superior to DD's?

Your getting owned as usual

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Apples to apples comparison. DD's skin and Superman's were tested on equal conditions. DD skin was proven superior or at least equal.

Well guess what, so can DD. Again, do you have any evidence to suggest Superman's skin is different or superior to DD's?

No it wasnt at all. Not against physical attacks. You told me yourself there wasnt much force behind that blast bring in space, and you agreed that it was mainly heat and radiation.

Not to mention Superman still had the scar Batman have him from the Kryptonite weapon, so might not have been at 100% anyway at that point.

The evidence is hes a different bring with quite a different powerset.

Heck they dont even look like theyre the same species. Because theyre clearly not. A dog and a lion are both from Earth. Doesnt mean their physiology is exactly the same.

So yeah, overall very shaky evidence to use as fact.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
No it wasnt at all. Not against physical attacks. You told me yourself there wasnt much force behind that blast being in space, and you agreed that it was mainly heat and radiation.

Not to mention Superman still had the scar Batman gave him from the Kryptonite weapon, so might not have been at 100% anyway at that point.

The evidence is hes a different being with quite a different powerset.

Heck they dont even look like theyre the same species. Because theyre clearly not. A dog and a lion are both from Earth. Doesnt mean their physiology is exactly the same.

So yeah, overall very shaky evidence to use as fact.

^ Corrected some words, as there were quite a few misspells and auto corrects gone wrong.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Your getting owned as usual

You are being stupid, as usual.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
No it wasnt at all. Not against physical attacks. You told me yourself there wasnt much force behind that blast bring in space, and you agreed that it was mainly heat and radiation.

Not to mention Superman still had the scar Batman have him from the Kryptonite weapon, so might not have been at 100% anyway at that point.

The evidence is hes a different bring with quite a different powerset.

Heck they dont even look like theyre the same species. Because theyre clearly not. A dog and a lion are both from Earth. Doesnt mean their physiology is exactly the same.

So yeah, overall very shaky evidence to use as fact.

Overall, you are basing your entire case on PURE SPECULATION, as it's usual of you.

Unless you have specific proof that Superman's skin is more durable than DD's, stop giving attributes without evidence.

The facts are the facts, you can like them or you cannot, they won't change based on your preferences!

DD endured the nuke better than Superman did, which means, his skin is tougher!

Prove that Superman's skin is stronger than DD's, or he is getting amputated by Thanos' IS.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Overall, you are basing your entire case on PURE SPECULATION, as it's usual of you.

Unless you have specific proof that Superman's skin is more durable than DD's, stop giving attributes without evidence.

The facts are the facts, you can like them or you cannot, they won't change based on your preferences!

DD endured the nuke better than Superman did, which means, [B]his skin is tougher!

Prove that Superman's skin is stronger than DD's, or he is getting amputated by Thanos' IS. [/B]

What kind of meltdown is this?

No rebuttal of any of my points, just a complete meltdown.

All the Nuke proves is that Doomsday skin is better at enduring heat and radiation. But not necessarily physical impact.

On top Superman had suffered kryptonite poisoning in his prior fight and still had the scar from the kryptonite weapon.

And again On top its pretty evident Wonder Womans weapons are magical.

@ 1:30 notice how Wonder Womans sword glows up as it slices through the statue:

https://youtu.be/uC9qU3X1JgM

It does the same when she cuts Doomsday. So not directly comparable with Thanos sword.

So youve proven nothing (as per usual). Try again Josh.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
What kind of meltdown is this?

No rebuttal of any of my points, just a complete meltdown.

All the Nuke proves is that Doomsday skin is better at enduring heat and radiation. But not necessarily physical impact.

On top Superman had suffered kryptonite poisoning in his prior fight and still had the scar from the kryptonite weapon.

And again On top its pretty evident Wonder Womans weapons are magical.

@ 1:30 notice how Wonder Womans sword glows up as it slices through the statue:

https://youtu.be/uC9qU3X1JgM

It does the same when she cuts Doomsday. So not directly comparable with Thanos sword.

So youve proven nothing (as per usual). Try again Josh.

Prove that Superman's skin is more durable than DD's

It ain't that hard D.Thor. Unless you have evidence that Superman's skin is tougher than DD's, you can't give attributes to characters just for the sake of it.

We don't know how weak Superman was. Yes, he previously encountered Kryptonite, that doesn't mean that his body was still weak! Unless you can prove that Superman's body was still weak, you can keep speculating boy.

MORE SPECULATION

WW's sword has no feats on it's own, nor was it ever stated to be some sort of special sword for cutting Kryptonian abominations.

Once again, your bias speaks for your logic.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
[B]Prove that Superman's skin is more durable than DD's

It ain't that hard D.Thor. Unless you have evidence that Superman's skin is tougher than DD's, you can't give attributes to characters just for the sake of it.

We don't know how weak Superman was. Yes, he previously encountered Kryptonite, that doesn't mean that his body was still weak! Unless you can prove that Superman's body was still weak, you can keep speculating boy.

MORE SPECULATION

WW's sword has no feats on it's own, nor was it ever stated to be some sort of special sword for cutting Kryptonian abominations.

Once again, your bias speaks for your logic. [/B]

Well WW sword has been confirmed as magic in nature if you take the Bvs Tech Manual book as canon.

And didnt Doomsday technically shed his old skin and regenerate new skin? So was his durability great or his regenerative features?

Originally posted by WolvesofBabylon
Well WW sword has been confirmed as magic in nature if you take the Bvs Tech Manual book as canon.

And didnt Doomsday technically shed his old skin and regenerate new skin? So was his durability great or his regenerative features?

Magical in what aspect? Does it state that it has some special cutting properties or that it is specifically meant to amputate Kriptonian behemoths?

All I'm saying is that there is 0 evidence to suggest that Superman's skin is stronger than Doomsday's.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
[B]Prove that Superman's skin is more durable than DD's
[/B]

I dont need to. Hes a different being. What part of that do you not understand? Was it not visually evident enough for you?

Now Youve made the claim that Thanos sword would definitely cut Superman, so the Onus is on you to prove that.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander

Once again, your bias speaks for your logic.

What bias? Lol

I was simply questioning your definitive statement. To which you have responded with multiple meltdowns.

Ignoring the "is he more durable than DD" the fact that a nuke didn't splatter supes body to pieces is a huge durability feat for him, whether or not he survived it.

And was he even truly dead or in a coma-like state? I remember at the end of the movie wasn't shit levitating by his grave?

EDIT: Just confirmed, yup dirt levitates on his coffin. Dude wasn't dead. He survived a nuke, but it put him in a coma.

Yall don't think Thanos sword would cut Supes? After what it did to Caps shield? Ridiculous

Originally posted by ShadowFyre
Yall don't think Thanos sword would cut Supes? After what it did to Caps shield? Ridiculous

Even if it would, Superman could just snatch it away from him with his speed. Then decapitate him with it.

Yep, that sounds like something super-murderman would do. 😇

Originally posted by Darth Thor
I dont need to. Hes a different being. What part of that do you not understand? Was it not visually evident enough for you?

Now Youve made the claim that Thanos sword would definitely cut Superman, so the Onus is on you to prove that.

What bias? Lol

I was simply questioning your definitive statement. To which you have responded with multiple meltdowns.

What part of stop giving attributes without evidence don't you understand?

If you want to say that Superman's skin is tougher than DD's which endured a similar attack better, then prove it.

I don't need to prove the obvious, Thanos' sword>>>>>>>>>> WW's

Originally posted by Surtur
Even if it would, Superman could just snatch it away from him with his speed. Then decapitate him with it.

Snatching it away would require for him to grab something Thanos is grabing. In that point, it's not a matter of speed but of strength.

In that point, Thanos would outpower Superman.

Superman is stronger than Thanos.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Yep, that sounds like something super-murderman would do. 😇

The only hope for Thanos is to say his moms name is Martha, but I doubt he'll have time.