Originally posted by samhain
I'll be honest, I chuckled at this.About that Trump gun photo, which now has questionable origins from what I hear, it could be a pro-Trump photo or an anti-Trump photo depending on how you look at it really.
Why is it funny? Are you afraid of white supremacists when you leave your house? I really don't think about them. I probably have a much higher chance of being shot in the face by some gang banger who can't aim properly.
Wow...kudos to Jake Tapper. He can be a douche, but sometimes he is good.
CNN’s Jake Tapper and Rep. Rashida Tlaib Exchange Barbs Over Tying Rhetoric of Leaders to Violence
He was talking about republicans criticizing the anti-israeli rhetoric in the arab world and not criticizing Trump. She still got triggered cuz she doesn't think they incite shit.
Originally posted by Surtur
All I know is you run a business..
Cybersecurity Program Management
One of my degrees is in digital forensics and I am an ad hoc cybersecurity incident commander (when the need arises) which is jargon for "long boring digital forensic work to find the bad guys and clean up the mess."
yep.
Originally posted by Robtard
Is that the angle of gaslightning we're at now with this one? The False Flag like angle.
I don't understand what you're talking about.
But, yes, looks like likes and retweets are a problem when you politicize these things. You end up with embarrassing trails like in the video.
Let's be clear, though: Trump DID encourage violence against opposition. The sides are not "equal."
Originally posted by Robtard
Is that the angle of gaslightning we're at now with this one? The False Flag like angle.
Not me, don't even point that BS tripe at my post. I mean I realize it's the cool thing to do on kmc atm but get real.
If the purpose is to paint the shooter as a right nationalist to drive a political agenda without revealing his entire history then you too can be an ass clown in calling out things you don't like to fit a false narrative. I mean you love Russia conspiracies so why not 😉
Originally posted by snowdragon
Not me, don't even point that BS tripe at my post. I mean I realize it's the cool thing to do on kmc atm but get real.If the purpose is to paint the shooter as a right nationalist to drive a political agenda without revealing his entire history then you too can be an ass clown in calling out things you don't like to fit a false narrative. I mean you love Russia conspiracies so why not 😉
Same guy mocking false flags legit believes Trump bombed Syria to distract from Russia.
Originally posted by dadudemon
I don't understand what you're talking about.But, yes, looks like likes and retweets are a problem when you politicize these things. You end up with embarrassing trails like in the video.
Let's be clear, though: Trump DID encourage violence against opposition. The sides are not "equal."
I disagree, I think the left all but comes out and encourages violence. They don't have to say "Kill Trump! Attack him!'(though you did have that democrat lawmaker call for his assassination) They just label him a nazi and fascist and say he's gonna destroy the country and sit back and let the far left extremists do the work. Like mailing him poison. And then they label anyone who supports him racist and sexist and xenophobic, and then we see people attacked just for wearing a hat.
So I don't think one side is better than the other here. Labeling people literal nazis and fascists over and over and over is only gonna lead to one thing. And look at how his Charlottesville comments are treated. Yes he was clumsy when he said the "both sides" thing, but he also clearly called out nazis in his statement too. This is ignored, and they focus on this other comment to suggest he legit feels murderous nazis are good people.
Call it however you like, neither side has a moral high ground here. The white supremacists get focused on heavily, someone trying to kill Trump via poison barely was covered. THAT is the difference. The white supremacists are on the outside looking in. You can't say the same for the extremists on the left. You won't see Dayton get as much coverage as El Paso, and we both know why. And we both know some will try to excuse that with "there is a higher body count".
Originally posted by Surtur
I disagree, I think the left all but comes out and encourages violence. They don't have to say "Kill Trump! Attack him!'(though you did have that democrat lawmaker call for his assassination) They just label him a nazi and fascist and say he's gonna destroy the country and sit back and let the far left extremists do the work. Like mailing him poison. And then they label anyone who supports him racist and sexist and xenophobic, and then we see people attacked just for wearing a hat.So I don't think one side is better than the other here. Labeling people literal nazis and fascists over and over and over is only gonna lead to one thing. And look at how his Charlottesville comments are treated. Yes he was clumsy when he said the "both sides" thing, but he also clearly called out nazis in his statement too. This is ignored, and they focus on this other comment to suggest he legit feels murderous nazis are good people.
Call it however you like, neither side has a moral high ground here. The white supremacists get focused on heavily, someone trying to kill Trump via poison barely was covered. THAT is the difference. The white supremacists are on the outside looking in. You can't say the same for the extremists on the left. You won't see Dayton get as much coverage as El Paso, and we both know why. And we both know some will try to excuse that with "there is a higher body count".
Nothing to say on Obama, Biden and Clinton being sent suspicious packages though?
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Nothing to say on Obama, Biden and Clinton being sent suspicious packages though?
Those are wrong too.
I don't expect you to go back and look(cuz I certainly won't) but let us say we created an AI program right now that could hunt down past articles by news outlets. Do you think we'd find more coverage on places like CNN, MSNBC of the packages sent to Obama than we'd find of coverage on Trump being sent poison?
Like if you were a betting man, what do you feel the result would be? I think we both know what the result would be.
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
I have no idea because your news outlets aren't the same as mine. I don't recall either of them being widely reported over here.
Jesus dude, given the bias it's weird to me you don't think they more than likely covered the Obama thing more. Why not say it? You don't have to have followed the sites, surely you're aware of the bias of these networks though?