Originally posted by Robtard
And yet they're not that far off from each other, maybe a 6-7% difference. You're making it seem like one says Center than the other says Extreme Left. Being slightly to the Left isn't that far from Center. Neither is being slightly to the Right.But sure, don't believe the graphs and your lying eyes.
Pick. A. Site.
Originally posted by Surtur
In fact show me them openly pandering to the right, like they do with the left. No I do not mean "some other media outlets said it". Just use the BBC's actual behavior.The ben shapiro interview being an example of bias is retarded. It was neutral, the guy wasn't even leftist lol. Ben was wrong and admitted it.
Did the BBC cop their shit for the balloon? For stealth editing to make lefties look good? For bullshit diversity quotas?
This hill? Its shit to die on. It is not worth it.
I literally gave you an example of them pandering to the right with Nigel Farage being given far more screen time than his equivalent on the left.
Here's the stats
Nigel Farage no of times elected to a UK parliament 0
Highest number of MPs elected from his party 1
Number of appearances on its prime political debate show Question Time 33
Caroline Lucas of the green Party no of times elected to a UK parliament. 3
Highest number of MPs elected from her party 1
Number of appearances on Question Time. 11
Nicola Sturgeon of the SNP. No of times elected to a UK parliament 5
Highest number of MPs elected from her party. 55
Number of appearances on Question Time. 8
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
I literally gave you an example of them pandering to the right with Nigel Farage being given far more screen time than his equivalent on the left.Here's the stats
Nigel Farage no of times elected to a UK parliament 0
Highest number of MPs elected from his party 1
Number of appearances on its prime political debate show Question Time 33Caroline Lucas of the green Party no of times elected to a UK parliament. 3
Highest number of MPs elected from her party 1
Number of appearances on Question Time. 11Nicola Sturgeon of the SNP. No of times elected to a UK parliament 5
Highest number of MPs elected from her party. 55
Number of appearances on Question Time. 8
^ And then there's this Surt, actual data.
Originally posted by Surtur
He's more popular. Not an example of bias.Are you shitting me? You legit think they are bias for the right?
Jesus dude, Jaden 2.0 is waaay different from the previous Jaden. What happened?
If he's more popular why has he never been elected to the UK parliament and failed 7 times to do so?
https://theconversation.com/hard-evidence-how-biased-is-the-bbc-17028
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/5428081/bbc-news-coverage-biased-against-brexit/
Perfect example of opposing accusations of bias.
Originally posted by Surtur
Medbiasbiasfactcheck: BBC has a slight to moderate liberal bias.Giggle. This is the site Rob used to love to use. I wonder if dude still loves it.
And btw: he has used it far far more often than I used the "allsides" site. There is gonna be no excuse for ignoring it.
In fact I think I linked to the "allsides" place only once.
LOL@ "slight to moderarte bias" . If that is true then FOX is only "slight to moderate bias" as well.
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
It doesn't surprise me that jaden is sitting there and pretending like the BBC isn't extremely biased against people on the right. The BBC is basically the british version of CNN lol. No reasonable person takes the BBC seriously.
Why? I hope you've got more than a balloon on a morning chat show as evidence. A list of proven left wing political correspondents with membership of left wing parties, for example.
Are you saying that https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/bbc/ is wrong?
Originally posted by dadudemonFrom your lips to God's ears.
I wish these young black men would see their value, understand their worth, and stop this senseless violence.They should be hugging each other, building each other up, and exploring the limits of their knowledge and education. Instead, they use their brain power to do terrible things which only harms their communities and families. They keep themselves in perpetual poverty. If every single one of them decided to throw down their weapons and immediately embraced each other as brothers working to raise their families to a better place, they'd see their communities become better than most in less than 10 years. We know it's possible because Tulsa had Black Wall Street (had better schools, better healthcare, and better income than the white neighborhoods).
For 30 years I worked with (New York) inner-city high-school students and their families (mostly black). And a good number of these fine young men and women want to do exactly that. But it's tough trying to do this in non-supportive environments, neighborhoods that don't embrace the education ethic. And violence is the quickest means to empowerment, however iffy and temporary it may be. Those who uplift themselves through learning are real success stories.