Well in a set report they said atlanteans were about as strong as kryptonians. So aquaman is only a little behind superman in terms of strength and I did see a video that calculated aquaman lifting a sub to actually be exerting more energy than hulk's leviathan punch. So I don't think it's safe to just assume hulk is stronger
Originally posted by NotAllThatEvilSo do you believe Thor is stronger than Superman and AM since you are relying on feats and fan calculations only. I am sure the bias is so strong you will ignore Thors feat and the portrayal of Hulk being stronger than he is in direct comparison.
Well in a set report they said atlanteans were about as strong as kryptonians. So aquaman is only a little behind superman in terms of strength and I did see a video that calculated aquaman lifting a sub to actually be exerting more energy than hulk's leviathan punch. So I don't think it's safe to just assume hulk is stronger
What's thors best feat? The sokovia smash amplified by vibranium and we don't really know how durable the bifrost bridge is. Also, thor is stronger than hulk. The game master had to cheat to stop thor from kicking his butt in ragnorok. And thor*in his prime) is stronger than thano. Kicked his butt in infinity war. So that's not a good metric to use for thanos vs aquaman either
So we have thor > hulk. Thanos > hulk. And aquaman > hulk. The question is how aquaman and thanos stack up
Originally posted by NotAllThatEvilResisting the star. Somehow we do not know all the variables to any of these feats but you nerds only try to calculate the ones that help your guy.
What's thors best feat? The sokovia smash amplified by vibranium and we don't really know how durable the bifrost bridge is. Also, thor is stronger than hulk. The game master had to cheat to stop thor from kicking his butt in ragnorok. And thor*in his prime) is stronger than thano. Kicked his butt in infinity war. So that's not a good metric to use for thanos vs aquaman either
That is formidabilty not strength. Thor was evading his punches we see Thor has greater skill than hulk not strength or durability. Basically you are saying Thor has every advantage along with a host of powers and weapons yet he cannot beat the Hulk.
Incorrect. Thanos beat thor in Infinity War twice. Thanos beat him twice in EG. You claiming he is stronger is so ridiculous it offends me. You live in your own world where you just make things up.
AM does not possess stormbreaker and was getting his ass kicked by Steppenwolf. He got worked by BM who is just a human being with Atlantan gear. The guy possessed no super strength.
Originally posted by FrothByte
Is that confirmed anywhere? Were the Avengers 100% sure of that? Guess you also missed the part where Thanos was using the IG to block and counter IM's ranged attacks.
Why are you moving goalposts? I didn’t miss anything, nice strawman, I didn’t say he couldn’t use the gauntlet to block. This is how you debate, you strawman the fck our of anyone you debate with??
Resisting a star is also not a strength feat, but a durability feat.
In the beginning of the fight thor blocked several of hulk's attacks before activating his God mode and in the first avenger fight he caught and no showed one of hulk's punches. He even call himself the strongest avenger.
In infinity war thanos shoots his beam at thor who no sells it with stormbreaker, he then ends up with an axe in his chest and on the verge of tears. Eg thor is a joke and gets replaced with his ex he is so bad.
Aquaman beat black manta in a high tech Atlanta battle suit. Made by thos people who figured the secret to INFINITE ENERGY. Why are you using a fight aquaman won to downplay him?
He might not have stormbreaker, but he does have the king's trident. Not exactly comparable but since his old crappy one was capable of piercing steppenwolf, then I say it should be able to pierce thanks. Especially since drak's knives were also able to.
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Why are you moving goalposts? I didn’t miss anything, nice strawman, I didn’t say he couldn’t use the gauntlet to block. This is how you debate, you strawman the fck our of anyone you debate with??
Try to keep up will you. Point is, you have no proof that none of IM's attacks will work against no-IG Thanos.
Originally posted by FrothByte
And again, IM did not utilize his arsenal or flight against Thanos to the same extent he did in IW. In other words, he was dumbed down.
To be fair, in infinity war he and Dr strnge did get a couple of hours to sit around and plan out their attacks with their team while he and the avengers were flying by the seat of their pants in end game
Originally posted by FrothByte
And again, IM did not utilize his arsenal or flight against Thanos to the same extent he did in IW. In other words, he was dumbed down.
Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
To be fair, in infinity war he and Dr strnge did get a couple of hours to sit around and plan out their attacks with their team while he and the avengers were flying by the seat of their pants in end game
He didn’t watch the movie or he didn’t understand what he was watching
Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
To be fair, in infinity war he and Dr strnge did get a couple of hours to sit around and plan out their attacks with their team while he and the avengers were flying by the seat of their pants in end game
It doesn't take a few hours of planning to realize you can use your flight against a non-flying opponent. Besides, in IW they planned against an opponent they never faced. In Endgame, they were facing an opponent they've already fought. It shouldn't have been that hard to figure out a better plan of attack than what they did.
Originally posted by NotAllThatEvilIt is both he needed the strength and durability to resist. If his muscles could not resist he would be blown away. If you have no idea how the human body works and braces for impact you should not be in this debate.
Resisting a star is also not a strength feat, but a durability feat.In the beginning of the fight thor blocked several of hulk's attacks before activating his God mode and in the first avenger fight he caught and no showed one of hulk's punches. He even call himself the strongest avenger.
In infinity war thanos shoots his beam at thor who no sells it with stormbreaker, he then ends up with an axe in his chest and on the verge of tears. Eg thor is a joke and gets replaced with his ex he is so bad.
Aquaman beat black manta in a high tech Atlanta battle suit. Made by thos people who figured the secret to INFINITE ENERGY. Why are you using a fight aquaman won to downplay him?
He might not have stormbreaker, but he does have the king's trident. Not exactly comparable but since his old crappy one was capable of piercing steppenwolf, then I say it should be able to pierce thanks. Especially since drak's knives were also able to.
Thor also said he won easily and often exaggerates. Hulk is the strongest avenger and the only one strong enough to survive using the gauntlet.
Thor catches him off guard by stunning a energy barraged Thanos since he just put the last stone on. The energy hurts when the stones are all present. We see it start to hurt Hulk and cap just by putting it on. So Thor has that going, him distracted, a cheapshot and a momentum and all out hurl of the axe. The energy shot by the stones it went through. That does not make it more powerful than the stones just more powerful than the blast used with the momentum thrown at Thanos. Just as Tony Stark deflects a power stone blast with his shield. That doesn not make it more powerful than the blast just resistant enough to deflect the blast hurled at it.
And game store is not a joke. That version of Thor went up against an able bodied and prepared Thanos. So the difference clearly was that in this situation Thanos was not distracted and worn down by the energy of combining all infinity stones.
So what you are saying is that his human strength is not even important? Tech matters yes but so does strength. This is why when Iron Man goes toe to toe with Thanos we see who is clearly stronger when they lock horns. We saw no major strength edge there. You were just basing aqua mans strength on feeds that you not match how the characters portrayed in this franchise.
That was made years ago by the first king. So the armor has no relevance here since it was created by people far later than those that originally stumbled upon that. The armor does not possess infinite energy so what is your point? You have none. You were desperate. You are ridiculous. You troll.
The trailer does not have the seats to support that it is comparable to storm breaker. Thanos has the skill and the ability to dodge anyways. We see him not even take a storm breaker swing even without a weapon. He is armed here and will make shirt work of AM who was clearly outmatched by Steppenwolf.
Originally posted by FrothByteThe facts do not matter hence why debating with you truly is pointless. If flying was so easy why did Superman not just fly above Doomsday?
It doesn't take a few hours of planning to realize you can use your flight against a non-flying opponent. Besides, in IW they planned against an opponent they never faced. In Endgame, they were facing an opponent they've already fought. It shouldn't have been that hard to figure out a better plan of attack than what they did.