Google achieve Quantum Computing Supremacy
Google achieve Quantum Computing Supremacy
Originally posted by Putinbot1
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/rumors-hint-that-google-has-accomplished-quantum-supremacy
Edit:
An experiment on the best super computer would take 10,000 years. The same experiment on the quantum computer...3 minutes. 😐
Originally posted by Badabingit is still nothing to true consciousness as a human exhibits. Which is still unique in its complexity. Tbh the alchemical complexity of protein synthesis driven by respiration is still light years beyond anything a computer is able to do.Edit:
An experiment on the best super computer would take 10,000 years. The same experiment on the quantum computer...3 minutes. 😐
Originally posted by BrolyBlackRegular computers have to use a 1 and 0, one at a time, so they can only be binary. A Quantum computer uses quantum entanglement to use either a 1 , a 0, both at the same time or any combination of 1 and 0. Instead of memory bits, quantum computers use qubits. Each time a qubit is added, the processing power goes up exponentially. I believe the Google quantum computer was either 48 or 54 qubits. I'm going from memory, so my actual "facts" may be off, but you get the idea.
So has this actually happened and what is quantum computing?
Actually, Astner could explain the quantum computer way better than I can.
Originally posted by Putinbot1Yeah, I'm moving to Greenland just in case you're wrong. 👆
it is still nothing to true consciousness as a human exhibits. Which is still unique in its complexity. Tbh the alchemical complexity of protein synthesis driven by respiration is still light years beyond anything a computer is able to do.
Originally posted by Badabinghaha 🙂
Regular computers have to use a 1 and 0, one at a time, so they can only be binary. A Quantum computer uses quantum entanglement to use either a 1 , a 0, both at the same time or any combination of 1 and 0. Instead of memory bits, quantum computers use qubits. Each time a qubit is added, the processing power goes up exponentially. I believe the Google quantum computer was either 48 or 54 qubits. I'm going from memory, so my actual "facts" may be off, but you get the idea.Actually, Astner could explain the quantum computer way better than I can. Yeah, I'm moving to Greenland just in case you're wrong. 👆
Originally posted by Badabing
Regular computers have to use a 1 and 0, one at a time, so they can only be binary. A Quantum computer uses quantum entanglement to use either a 1 , a 0, both at the same time or any combination of 1 and 0. Instead of memory bits, quantum computers use qubits. Each time a qubit is added, the processing power goes up exponentially. I believe the Google quantum computer was either 48 or 54 qubits. I'm going from memory, so my actual "facts" may be off, but you get the idea.Actually, Astner could explain the quantum computer way better than I can. Yeah, I'm moving to Greenland just in case you're wrong. 👆
So basically it’s an exponentially computer that expands at an unlimited rapid rate.
Originally posted by BrolyBlackHonestly, ask Astner. And cdtm posted some in the CBVF off topic thread. My understanding is basic. Quantum mechanics gives me a headache because some of it is so counterintuitive. Particles popping into existence from the vacuum out of nothing, quantum entanglement where 2 objects can affect each other instantly over light years somehow, light being a wave and a particle, something being in 2 places at once, Schrödinger's cat, uncertainty principle...
So basically it’s an exponentially computer that expands at an unlimited rapid rate.
The alleged quantum computer D-wave is special designed for a certain type of combinatoric optimization problems, and because of that isn't able to break modern encryption. The reason I'm reserved is because there's a lot of skepticism surrounding the information revealed, which suggests that D-wave behaves more like a specialized classical computer. But it's good that we have a lot of investors pushing the study of its technology and architecture.
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
So has this actually happened and what is quantum computing?
This topic isn't nearly as abstract as Badabing is making it seem, anything general can be outlined in layman terms. It's first when you try to figure out stuff about particular computation methods that things have to get a bit technical.
I'm going to reorganize this reply a bit, to make it more digestible.
Originally posted by Badabing
something being in 2 places at once, Schrödinger's cat, uncertainty principle...
This isn't the case when you're examining a particle, because in order to measure the position of a particle you have to interact with it with other particles, and the moment you do that you lose information (of its wave properties) because you've altered its energy-state through the interaction.
Say that there's a 50% probability that a particle is in position A and a 50% probability that it's in position B, here you would say that the particle is in a superposition of the two states, or that it exists in both places at the same time. This of course isn't the case, it's either in A or B it's just that it's not yet determined.
However, when you're dealing with large quantities (as you do in quantum mechanics) it makes more sense because the sample is distributed according to its probability-rate, so you can say that half of the sample would be in position A and half in position B.
Originally posted by Badabing
quantum entanglement where 2 objects can affect each other instantly over light years somehow
Originally posted by Badabing
light being a wave and a particle
Originally posted by Badabing
Particles popping into existence from the vacuum out of nothing,