NYT: Schiff had a early meeting with whistleblower

^Trying so hard.

Originally posted by Robtard

I agree. The Dems are gaslighitng this whole process. Trying to pull a bait and switch before the mess and corruption of the Dems becomes official and heads start to roll.

This was a preemptive strike against the Republicans and Trump. And it is backfiring, big time.

Also, when I asked, "Can we fire all of them, yet?", I was talking about both the Dems and GOP.

Having deja vu. We've done the "it's not us, it was them warriors!" dance already with the Mueller investigation.

So you'd think you'd learn.

Originally posted by Robtard
Having deja vu. We've done the "it's not us, it was them warriors!" dance already with the Mueller investigation.

I'm probably out of the loop on whatever arguments you've had with "the gang" in the past. But, yeah, I agree. Feels like another wasted effort by the Dems and we get a whole lotta "nothing burger" again. And then Trump's approval rating will rise again. It's like they are serving up wins for Trump, left and right.

Trump is sitting higher than Obama was at this term in his presidency. And the magic number is 45% approval.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/trump_administration/prez_track_oct02

This is part of why I say the Dems have nothing left and not even a Hail Mary can save them from a 2020 loss. It's going to get ugly for the Dems. They are going to become an obsolete party if they don't change.

Originally posted by Surtur
So you'd think you'd learn.

Yes, learned that anything Trump is accused of and looks shady of, you people will spin it and counter-accuse as a means to defend and deflect from el dorito.

Case in point: This thread

Did you not see the film "The Warriors"?

So why'd this whisteblower only go to the democrat controlled house and not also the senate intelligence committee?

Originally posted by Robtard
Yes, learned that anything Trump is accused of and looks shady of, you people will spin it and counter-accuse as a means to defend and deflect from el dorito.

Case in point: This thread

Did you not see the film "The Warriors"?

As opposed to immediately believing any accusation and screaming "impeach!". Case in point: the last 2-3 years.

Originally posted by Robtard
Yes, learned that anything Trump is accused of and looks shady of, you people will spin it and counter-accuse as a means to defend and deflect from el dorito.

Case in point: This thread

Seriously, WTF. Adam Schiff is a HUGE bold liar. Wait for it.........Trump lies a lot too and uses social media to propagate that trash so why in the world would you stand behind the democrat version of that garbage?

Originally posted by snowdragon
Seriously, WTF. Adam Schiff is a HUGE bold liar. Wait for it.........Trump lies a lot too and uses social media to propagate that trash so why in the world would you stand behind the democrat version of that garbage?

And you gotta love this defense of the lie by a Daily Beast writer on twitter:

"Schiff did appear to lie here in previously saying that his office had not spoken directly with the whistleblower. But if you care more about this stuff than the actual substance of the whistleblower complaint than you’re being a hack."

Lol

Originally posted by Surtur
So why'd this whisteblower only go to the democrat controlled house and not also the senate intelligence committee?

Or through the proper reporting channels like policy dictates?

Nothing to see here though, just routine stuff. Yeah okay Schiff lied over "routine" stuff, not sure why, but hey look over there...Trump did something perfectly legal and within his power!

Originally posted by Surtur
Nothing to see here though, just routine stuff. Yeah okay Schiff lied over "routine" stuff, not sure why.

Feels like the Kavanaugh situation all over again. She magically only reports the issue to a pro-Hillary, anti-Trump rep and her lawyer just so happened to be at Hillary campaign fundraisers with that same rep.

Brett Kavanaugh is an awful man because he had the audacity to get upset over being publicly labeled a gang rapist. Psshhh, who does that?

All those other judges? Would be stoic as f*ck if called a gang rapist and accused of running rape gangs.

HYG:

Originally posted by Robtard
“Like other whistle-blowers have done before and since under Republican and Democratic-controlled committees, the whistle-blower contacted the committee for guidance on how to report possible wrongdoing within the jurisdiction of the intelligence community,” -snip

Yeah you've posted the damage control. If it's so routine there was no need to lie.

^ A Trumper complaining about [alleged] lying and misinformation. Zero self-awareness. Too funny.

^Leftist who suddenly is indifferent to lies.

"Alleged" lies. Not proven to be true as fact.

Unlike Trump who outright contradicted (aka lied) what the transcript he himself released a day later and Trumpers went "meh".