Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
I think Arthur would be the biggest threat here. But, as long as Arthur is inland, Thor is pretty much stomping.Near a water source, Arthur would represent a more fair match, but would still ultimately succumb to the God of Thunder.
Even if Arthur brings the fight under water, we know Thor can survive for quite a long time without the need to breath and he can easily fry anything around him underwater with his lightning.
That said, Arthur is still probably the biggest threat if only because his trident might be the only weapon they have that can injure Thor. Well, that and maybe Manta's blades. That's a big IF though.
Originally posted by FrothByte
Even if Arthur brings the fight under water, we know Thor can survive for quite a long time without the need to breath and he can easily fry anything around him underwater with his lightning.That said, Arthur is still probably the biggest threat if only because his trident might be the only weapon they have that can injure Thor. Well, that and maybe Manta's blades. That's a big IF though.
If it's in shallow waters, I agree.
Originally posted by FrothByte
Even if Arthur brings the fight under water, we know Thor can survive for quite a long time without the need to breath and he can easily fry anything around him underwater with his lightning.That said, Arthur is still probably the biggest threat if only because his trident might be the only weapon they have that can injure Thor. Well, that and maybe Manta's blades. That's a big IF though.
Loki's knife got thor in the first avengers. Manta's blades can almost certainly get him.
Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
Loki's knife got thor in the first avengers. Manta's blades can almost certainly get him.
Loki's knives are seemingly magical. Just because they hurt Thor doesn't mean Manta's will as well.
They also didn't seem to have any lasting effect on Thor, as he was perfectly fine a minute later.
Originally posted by 9jaboy
I wonder why Fat Thor never blasted Thanos for once in EG tbh knowing he was out of shape, whereas the first thing he did was to blast him in infinity war.
Because PIS. Thor, IM and Captain Marvel all had the opportunity to just stay in the air and bombard Thanos with long range shots. I was honestly disappointed with that last fight in Endgame, there were just so many stupid things happening. I had expected better from the Russo''s.
Originally posted by FrothByte
What do you need me to back up? That Fat Thor can generate lightning or that water is a good conductor of electricity?
Thor has never casted lightning while fully submerged. And even if he can, does a lightning work the same way underwater?
Even if so, Fat Thor doesn't seem to use lightning a lot.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Thor has never casted lightning while fully submerged. And even if he can, does a lightning work the same way underwater?Even if so, Fat Thor doesn't seem to use lightning a lot.
Thor can generate lighting from himself and nothing about water contradicts that. If you want to claim he can't do so while underwater that's up to you to prove.
A lightning bolt won't travel in a direct line under water but will instead spread out and electrocute anything near by as the water acts as a conductor.
Fat Thor doesn't use lightning as much as Ragnarok Thor but he still used it.