Originally posted by dadudemon
Watch the video in context of her point #1, read Jaden's incorrect point, then read my point about Jaden's incorrect point, and then comment your informed opinion so you don't have to talk purely in conjecture about the probabilities for the motivations of statements regarding the topic.I promise, it will take you 5 minutes or less to do this.
Excuse the delay, didn't have time to watch until now. Her #1 point starts at 06:38 and ends at 08:33.
Jaden is correct in his assessment of her #1 point, as she made at lot claims about climate change predictions being peddled, claimed it wasn't just politicians, but climate scientist, but did not drop a single scientific name backing a prediction to back up her assertions. Zero. eg The "12 years we're doomed" came from AOC; she is not a climate scientist, this was dropped twice in less than two minutes by her to prove her points.
She also claimed that 'zero' predictions came true; this is a lie. eg Warming temperatures are happening due to pollution/greenhouse gases, this has been spoken about for decades.
This woman is a gaslighter, a liar and it's sad to see her brainwashing so many young people.
Originally posted by Robtard
Excuse the delay, didn't have time to watch until now. Her #1 point starts at 06:38 and ends at 08:33.[b]Jaden
is correct in his assessment of her #1 point, as she made at lot claims about climate change predictions being peddled, claimed it wasn't just politicians, but climate scientist, but did not drop a single scientific name backing a prediction to back up her assertions. Zero. eg The "12 years we're doomed" came from AOC; she is not a climate scientist, this was dropped twice in less than two minutes by her to prove her points.She also claimed that 'zero' predictions came true; this is a lie. eg Warming temperatures are happening due to pollution/greenhouse gases, this has been spoken about for decades.
This woman is a gaslighter, a liar and it's sad to see her brainwashing so many young people. [/B]
This point of yours feels contrived as hell. haermm
It doesn't take hardly any research at all to find a single example of a scientist making a stupid prediction to make her correct.
Since there are hundreds, it's easy to prove this point of hers correct.
Also, I went back and reread the exchange between Jaden and I. haermm
Holy shit...he's either trolling or just pretending to be terrible with his arguments.
Originally posted by dadudemon
This point of yours feels contrived as hell. haermmIt doesn't take hardly any research at all to find a single example of a scientist making a stupid prediction to make her correct.
Since there are hundreds, it's easy to prove this point of hers correct.
Also, I went back and reread the exchange between Jaden and I. haermm
Holy shit...he's either trolling or just pretending to be terrible with his arguments.
Why are you still pretending to not understand?
There's literally an example of what I'm saying in first video I posted.
A scientist can make a prediction but if it's not based on anything more than their own opinion then it's not a scientific prediction, is it?
And that's one of the things that she does in her video. The others are equating media reports and what she calls "criers" as being scientific predictions.
Again there's literally examples in the video I posted if how exactly that is carried out. Namely Steven Crowder attacking scientists over predictions about water levels in the Great lakes. He claimed "scientists predicted" that the water levels would drop.and take decades to recover. Turned out it was a politician that said it. Turned out the scientists predicted exactly what was happening.
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Why are you still pretending to not understand?There's literally an example of what I'm saying in first video I posted.
A scientist can make a prediction but if it's not based on anything more than their own opinion then it's not a scientific prediction, is it?
And that's one of the things that she does in her video. The others are equating media reports and what she calls "criers" as being scientific predictions.
Again there's literally examples in the video I posted if how exactly that is carried out. Namely Steven Crowder attacking scientists over predictions about water levels in the Great lakes. He claimed "scientists predicted" that the water levels would drop.and take decades to recover. Turned out it was a politician that said it. Turned out the scientists predicted exactly what was happening.
It's still a prediction, it's just a prediction based on their opinion.
Originally posted by dadudemon
This point of yours feels contrived as hell. haermmIt doesn't take hardly any research at all to find a single example of a scientist making a stupid prediction to make her correct.
Since there are hundreds, it's easy to prove this point of hers correct.
Also, I went back and reread the exchange between Jaden and I. haermm
Holy shit...he's either trolling or just pretending to be terrible with his arguments.
Well no, but okay.
Yet she couldn't spare all of 20 seconds to drop a single scientific name who made a given climate change prediction that was backed via review; which proved to be false to support her claims? Odd, cos she had time to drop Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's "12 years" claim, not once, but twice as proof. She's also an outright liar at times.
Disagreed, Jaden's point has remained the same from the start; he has backed it with multiple examples.
Originally posted by Robtard
Well no, but okay.Yet she couldn't spare all of 20 seconds to drop a single scientific name...
Why? Why would she put that out there when this stuff is easily searchable in a few seconds? Why single out one among hundreds?
It's a bit immature to do that type of mudslinging and she has 10 points to get through. If she wanted to give a presentation only on 1, they already exist and people present on it. Multiple exist if you're interested where those papers and prediction are taken apart, piece by piece.
Originally posted by Robtard
Disagreed, Jaden's point has remained the same from the start; he has backed it with multiple examples.
Very few people have been as directly and overtly wrong as Jaden and I caught him moving the goalposts: it's obvious.
This is not debatable. But I think you're doing that troll thing you do to Surtur because he's stupid enough to respond for pages where no meaningful conversation takes place.
Everybody is Warming Up Twice as Fast then every one else.