Hillary Clinton says Tusli Gabbard and Jill Stein are Russian Agents

YouTube video

Hillary is scared that Tulsi Gabbard might become the first woman President - so she's trying to sabotage her by making up the same bullshit lie she made up against Trump.

This backfired and has exposed the fact that Hillary might have been full of shit the entire time to Liberals and Independents alike.

Now CNN and the Democrat Party have to decide whether Hillary's crazy antics are still an asset or a liability.

Hillary still hasn't forgiven her for endorsing Bernie in 2016.

this is already being discussed in the 2020 elections thread, as super-important as your opinion is.

It is true it was already slapped down as ridiculous in another thread.

Originally posted by Surtur
It is true it was already slapped down as ridiculous in another thread.

indeed, since she actually was suggesting that gabbard was being groomed by the republican party, and not russia. I know, it's very confusing since republicans have their noses so deep in putin's ass that it's tough to see the difference between the two. I experienced the same confusion myself on the matter 🙂

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2019/oct/22/hillary-clinton-and-whether-she-called-tulsi-gabba/

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
indeed, since she actually was suggesting that gabbard was being groomed by the republican party, and not russia. I know, it's very confusing since republicans have their noses so deep in putin's ass that it's tough to see the difference between the two. I experienced the same confusion myself on the matter 🙂

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2019/oct/22/hillary-clinton-and-whether-she-called-tulsi-gabba/

No she wasn't doing that, she said "russians are grooming". Her spokes person trying to back track failed.

nope, that's a deliberate misquote. facts>>>>your fee-fees

Incorrect spin, my son.

The link you gave doesn't even say it's true she was referring to the GOP. It cites her spokesman and says people can decide for themselves.

you posted a misquote. have fun lying, I guess.

Paraphrased what she said kid. Anything else you got?

And you just lied when you acted like your link is irrefutable evidence. Poor form.

"They're also going to do third party again. And I'm not making any predictions but I think they've got their eye on somebody who is currently in the Democratic primary and are grooming her to be the third party candidate. She's the favorite of the Russians. They have a bunch of sites and bots and other ways of supporting her so far, and that's assuming Jill Stein will give it up. Which she might not, 'cause she's also a Russian asset."

So if this is just all about Republicans, explain what she means by "do third party again". When did they do it before? Oh...now is it gonna be claimed the Republicans groomed Stein?

that was a lie and a miquote, not a paraphrase.

in the future, refrain from using quotations. quotations are for quotes, which is why they're referred to as such. So your sentence should have been worded something like:

"Clinton said that Gabbard was being groomed by the Russians",

...Although that would also be a lie because the podcast transcript provides context (also more important than your fee-fees in such matters), which shows that the original quote in question was referring to their present conversation about republican strategy.

The context is them lying and saying one reason he was able to win was because of a third party vote. That is not true, conspiracy number 1. She then goes on to say they will do a "third party run again". They being Russians, not Republicans.

If she means Republicans, when did they do the third party run the first time? Is it now being claimed Jill Stein was groomed by the GOP? Would you like to trade one conspiracy theory for another? Because it all looks bad.

Originally posted by Surtur
No she wasn't doing that, she said "russians are grooming". Her spokes person trying to back track failed.

She really didn't say that I listened to the podcast. She spoke ALOT about Russia and inferred Tulsi is a Russian asset and that if stein would step down from that roll tulsi could step up essentially.

Hillary was alluding that Tulsi was a russian asset like Stein, that's the piece. The rest is noise.

https://www.politico.com/news/2019/10/18/hillary-clinton-tulsi-gabbard-russias-050991

Originally posted by CaveDude33211
YouTube video

Hillary is scared that Tulsi Gabbard might become the first woman President - so she's trying to sabotage her by making up the same bullshit lie she made up against Trump.

This backfired and has exposed the fact that Hillary might have been full of shit the entire time to Liberals and Independents alike.

Now CNN and the Democrat Party have to decide whether Hillary's crazy antics are still an asset or a liability.

Originally posted by Surtur
Paraphrased what she said kid. Anything else you got?

And you just lied when you acted like your link is irrefutable evidence. Poor form.

Sorry, Surt, I have to get behind BT on this.

https://www.snopes.com/ap/2019/10/18/hillary-clinton-implies-gabbard-is-favored-by-russia/

Hillary Clinton Implies Gabbard is Favored by Russia
Clinton did not mention the Hawaii congresswoman by name, but said she believes the Russians have "got their eye on somebody who's currently in the Democratic primary."

ASSOCIATED PRESS
PUBLISHED 18 OCTOBER 2019

Image via Jacob Hamilton/Ann Arbor News via AP
MANCHESTER, N.H. (AP) — Hillary Clinton appears to call Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard “the favorite of the Russians” in a recent interview, while also describing 2016 Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein as “a Russian asset.”

During a podcast appearance on Campaign HQ with David Plouffe, the former secretary of state and 2016 Democratic presidential nominee did not mention the Hawaii congresswoman by name, but said she believes the Russians have “got their eye on somebody who’s currently in the Democratic primary and are grooming her to be the third party candidate.”

“She’s the favorite of the Russians,” Clinton said. “They have a bunch of sites and bots and other ways of supporting her so far. And that’s assuming Jill Stein will give it up, which she might not because she’s also a Russian asset.”

The Russians know they can’t win without a third party candidate, Clinton added.

Earlier in the interview, she also called President Donald Trump “Vladimir Putin’s dream.” She goes on to say that Trump’s inauguration speech was “like a declaration of war on half of America.”

Gabbard’s campaign did not immediately respond to requests for comment, though Gabbard did respond to similar criticism during the Democratic debate in Ohio earlier this week. “This morning, a CNN commentator said on national television that I’m an asset of Russia,” Gabbard said on stage. “Completely despicable.”

Because I wouldn't trust if Snopes says the sun is hot. 😈

Originally posted by Surtur
It is true it was already slapped down as ridiculous in another thread.

Yep. Slapped down as being a baseless, crazy ass conspiracy theory; just as her claiming Trump was as well.

@CDTM: Snopes? lmao.

They are a left-wing biased joke and everyone knows it.

WHOEVER she's accusing, without hard evidence, she will only serve to marginalize herself.

The "Russian agent" accusation is played out, and I doubt many on the left will credit her using it on her own brethren.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
@CDTM: Snopes? lmao.

They are a left-wing biased joke and everyone knows it.

They're pretty biased, no question. It's all in the labeling, one article will say "Mostly false", while another will say "partly true" for similar evidence.

There was an editorial (Forget the site) where a center left writer who trusted them tried digging into their vetting process, only to discover they really don't have one. Some of the people they hire COULD be unbiased. Or, they could be VERY biased.

But no one is "peer reviewing" these people.