Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Well, ours is not the only star system, so.....if we assume it functions like the real world, ours is pretty unique. That's like assuming every person who is depicted running in comics is like Usain Bolt, because....real world. Lol.So he destroys 99.9%? Cool. So not 100%. ASSUMING it's like ours, and not like any other star system in our entire universe.
And lastly, that's a fair point on him not only destroying planets. But the point still stands - that he has to go from 'celestial body' to 'celestial body' to do so, and NOT as Stoic says, destroying entire solar systems (and MORE! You conveniently ignore this 😂) at a time.
Originally posted by TheHulkster
https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/there rights-another-solar-system-out-there-8-planets-ours-finds-nasas-kepler-73190
Did you read the links?
First one said 'for the first time', which shows that we're pretty rare. And even then, the only thing it shares in common is the number of planets, nothing else.
Second link says there are 2500 that we know of in our galaxy alone.
So the odds are....no, most solar systems are NOT like ours.
So to say 'that solar system shown is exactly like ours, where 99.9% of the mass is in the sun', is....... incredibly wrong.
I'm not sure why you posted those two links lol.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Did you read the links?First one said 'for the first time', which shows that we're pretty rare. And even then, the only thing it shares in common is the number of planets, nothing else.
Second link says there are 2500 that we know of in our galaxy alone.
So the odds are....no, most solar systems are NOT like ours.
So to say 'that solar system shown is exactly like ours, where 99.9% of the mass is in the sun', is....... incredibly wrong.
I'm not sure why you posted those two links lol.
This is worse than “the planet was smaller” which you guys have recently scoffed at. Show a solar system that is not in the range of 98.8 - 98.9% sun. Otherwise, that is the rule by default. Different positions and different sizes of planets don’t change this.
You again have ignored that destroying the sun destroys the system and the notion that a being dwarfing a solar system and crushing its star in his hands not being able to destroy the entire system is quite absurd IMO.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Basically. But of course, Stoic doesn't quite grasp that....
We actually see him destroying the last planet. We don't know what happened before that. It's speculation.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
It wasn't shown? And he was shown going from planet to planet?Feel free to add your own comic pages if you want ....
Adding to it is what you're attempting to do. We have no idea how long it would take for TOBA to destroy a solar system or galaxy. What we see is him ferreting out straggler planets.
Let me ask you a question. Who did TOBA Hulk kill? I mean other than Franklin and Galactus? It states that he killed them all correct?. Who wasn't wasn't included in that statement?
Originally posted by h1a8
Pretty much
A solar system does not require planets to be a solar system. A solar system is a sun and it’s gravitational system. Anything caught in that gravitational system is included.
A star/sun is necessary to make a solar system. Destroy the sun and destroy the solar system.
Originally posted by TheHulkster
This is worse than “the planet was smaller” which you guys have recently scoffed at. Show a solar system that is not in the range of 98.8 - 98.9% sun. Otherwise, that is the rule by default. Different positions and different sizes of planets don’t change this.You again have ignored that destroying the sun destroys the system and the notion that a being dwarfing a solar system and crushing its star in his hands not being able to destroy the entire system is quite absurd IMO.
Erm....you made the claim, so isn't it on YOU to prove that the average system is 98-99% within the star?
And absurd? Again, Stoic, who you're trying to argue for, said he was destroying entire solar systems or MORE at a time.. All I asked for was for it to be shown, otherwise all we were shown was him moving from body to body at a time.
Are you one of those guys who takes on food challenges, then argues that because you ate '98/99%of the meal', you've eaten '100%: of the meal?
Originally posted by Adam Grimes
We don't know who was there and who wasn't since it was an alternate universe. 🙂
TOBA Hulk originates from the 616 time line. So we assume that once TOBA rises from whatever pit of hell that he does and begins destroying things is where that future branches toward. Those other beings would still exist, unless they packed up and moved to another time line, or they decided that life was no longer worth living and commited suicide. All of them accept for Franklin, Galactus, Mr. Immortal, and the Ghost of Galactus' past.
Originally posted by StoicYeah, we don't know for sure either tbh. And that's... A pretty reasonable post actually.
TOBA Hulk originates from the 616 time line. So we assume that once TOBA rises from whatever pit of hell that he does and begins destroying things is where that future branches toward. Those other beings would still exist, unless they packed up and moved to another time line, or they decided that life was no longer worth living and commited suicide. All of them accept for Franklin, Galactus, Mr. Immortal, and the Ghost of Galactus' past.