Originally posted by carthage
Tony’s Nanotech Bleeding edge armorFight takes place on neutral ground
Who wins
Tony.
Now that I think about it, the Hulk movie didn't really have any massive strength portrayal on the side of any character (If you compare it to things like MCU Hulk punching the leviathan for instance).
Tony has too many options, uses his mobility better than any combatant in current comic book cinema that I can think of, and has plenty of strength and durability feats to back up his arsenal.
Originally posted by riv6672
^^^ that’s true on the strength feats. Never noticed that.
But yeah, Toby would outfight out think out maneuver Abom FTW.
Bane would get crushed by random battle debris.
Originally posted by KingD19
But Norton Hulk despite being the same in continuity doesnt have the feats as RuffaHulk. You can't retroactively give him showings.
I get that but fact is they are both MCU Hulk.
StormBreaker Thor has better feats than Mjolnir Thor, but they are both MCU Thor, as in the same guy, just from different points in time.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
I get that but fact is they are both MCU Hulk.StormBreaker Thor has better feats than Mjolnir Thor, but they are both MCU Thor, as in the same guy, just from different points in time.
Exactly. And as we are using Abomination and Hulk from that particular time frame/movie, then he doesn't get feats from future films.
If someone made a match using Dark World Thor, you wouldn't post feats of him throwing lightning punches and creating lightning weapons because he couldn't do that until Ragnarok.
If a character exists across multiple movies, then they only get feats up to the movie/show in question, not further as that hasn't happened for the character yet.
Back on topic of Blonksy though, he didn't have too many feats and Tony has some similar if not better strength showings.