Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Never.And?
The term alternate reality version should never be used to invalidate the character’s power levels, unless it shows that the original version of the character would absolutely blow the alt version out of the water. I thought that it was a double standard to use that excuse for one character while leaving the other alt character alone.
Originally posted by Stoic
The term alternate reality version should never be used to invalidate the character’s power levels, unless it shows that the original version of the character would absolutely blow the alt version out of the water. I thought that it was a double standard to use that excuse for one character while leaving the other alt character alone.
.....do you read comics?
Originally posted by Stoic
The term alternate reality version should never be used to invalidate the character’s power levels, unless it shows that the original version of the character would absolutely blow the alt version out of the water. I thought that it was a double standard to use that excuse for one character while leaving the other alt character alone.
Hence the use of 'standard' feats, as it were. Dceased Superman could operate in the span of nanoseconds, for example. A nanosecond is still a nanosecond, regardless of the universe, whether it be Earth 1, or Earth 2648.
On the other hand, 'alt Galactus ' has no feats. King Hyperion's feats were all based on him fighting alt characters, who in turn had very little (or no?) feats.
Originally posted by Delta1938
.....do you read comics?
Not my point. Try understanding what I am getting at. People scrutinize one while not realizing that the other must be placed under the same amount of scrutiny.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Hence the use of 'standard' feats, as it were. Dceased Superman could operate in the span of nanoseconds, for example. A nanosecond is still a nanosecond, regardless of the universe, whether it be Earth 1, or Earth 2648.On the other hand, 'alt Galactus ' has no feats. King Hyperion's feats were all based on him fighting alt characters, who in turn had very little (or no?) feats.
That doesn’t mean that DCeased Superman gets the same high end feats as his regular counterpart. Kind of like the Immortal Hulk killing everything in the universe. You remember the scrutiny that was placed on that by Adam Grimes? Remember it, never forget it, because the it runs both ways.
Originally posted by Stoic
Not my point. Try understanding what I am getting at. People scrutinize one while not realizing that the other must be placed under the same amount of scrutiny.That doesn’t mean that DCeased Superman gets the same high end feats as his regular counterpart. Kind of like the Immortal Hulk killing everything in the universe. You remember the scrutiny that was placed on that by Adam Grimes? Remember it, never forget it, because the it runs both ways.
Nobody here said he did get the same as normal Superman - where did you get that idea from? You can read the post of mine at the top of this very page, and check the feat I posted on page 7.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Well since you want to support your boy Carv, I helpfully summarised it for you in the post below the one you quoted.In one post, he - and at the time, only he - gave an opinion on who won. And based it on a fight that wasn't even shown, with a character who has zero feats.
Then asked for proof from other posters in another post.
And insulting your intelligence implies you have any to insult.
Here you go Stoic. You had the exact same argument nearly three years ago, then disappeared when I brought this up. So maybe three years later, you've actually understood what's been argued in this thread?
Originally posted by Stoic
You think youre so superior. Life has a way of softening that ass for you kid.
Or I'm right and you're wrong. Which given your failure to understand DarkSaint's point in this thread when you kept calling him a hypocrite, is likely the case. Also, I'm not a kid, but whatever helps you sleep at night Sally Sensitive.