Michael Bloomberg "Disarm minorities to keep them alive."

Started by cdtm1 pages

Michael Bloomberg "Disarm minorities to keep them alive."

https://www.aspentimes.com/news/michael-bloomberg-calls-colorados-decision-on-legal-pot-stupid/

Posting this for a few reasons.

1. It sounds awfully similar to something a white supremacist would say.

2. Bloomberg claims he only said this because a church leader told his congregation if they would frisk their kids, the mayor wouldn't have to. That means he's an example of a two faced politician who never tells inconvenient truths to an unreceptive audience.

3. It says a lot about gun control advocacy. Is it really about keeping guns away from crazies? Or is the truth that they don't want an armed underclass of minorities, because they secretly (Or not so secretly) don't think like "normal" people do, and are less trustworthy with a gun?

And here's the quote in question:

Bloomberg claimed that 95 percent of murders fall into a specific category: male, minority and between the ages of 15 and 25. Cities need to get guns out of this group’s hands and keep them alive, he said.

“These kids think they’re going to get killed anyway because all their friends are getting killed,” Bloomberg said. “They just don’t have any long-term focus or anything. It’s a joke to have a gun. It’s a joke to pull a trigger.”

At one point, the former mayor brought up New York City’s stop-and-frisk practices, which gained national attention in 2011. Bloomberg said that during his last year in office, a minister at a Baptist church in Harlem invited him to speak.

“While I’m sitting there waiting for him to introduce me, he said to his congregation, ‘You know, if every one of you stopped and frisked your kid before they went out at night, the mayor wouldn’t have to do it,’” Bloomberg said. “And so I knew I was going to be okay with that audience.”

They do commit the most murders, but I doubt a majority of them are done with legally purchased weapons.

Only the white race should own firearms

I'm glad to see all my fellow KMC Stormfront brothers on board with Mr. Bloomberg's sensible statement.

Tax the poor more so they'll live longer, 2020 candidate Michael Bloomberg says in resurfaced video

Hmmm

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
I'm glad to see all my fellow KMC Stormfront brothers on board with Mr. Bloomberg's sensible statement.
😂

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
I'm glad to see all my fellow KMC Stormfront brothers on board with Mr. Bloomberg's sensible statement.

Hear hear!

I fully support love of meteorology, in particular lovely storms. 👆

Originally posted by cdtm
Hear hear!

I fully support love of meteorology, in particular lovely storms. 👆

I Surtify this response.

Originally posted by cdtm
https://www.aspentimes.com/news/michael-bloomberg-calls-colorados-decision-on-legal-pot-stupid/

Posting this for a few reasons.

1. It sounds awfully similar to something a white supremacist would say.

2. Bloomberg claims he only said this because a church leader told his congregation if they would frisk their kids, the mayor wouldn't have to. That means he's an example of a two faced politician who never tells inconvenient truths to an unreceptive audience.

3. It says a lot about gun control advocacy. Is it really about keeping guns away from crazies? Or is the truth that they don't want an armed underclass of minorities, because they secretly (Or not so secretly) don't think like "normal" people do, and are less trustworthy with a gun?

And here's the quote in question:

Bloomberg claimed that 95 percent of murders fall into a specific category: male, minority and between the ages of 15 and 25. Cities need to get guns out of this group’s hands and keep them alive, he said.

I've posted several times about Democrats wanting to disarm black people for well over 150 years, now.

The "progressive party" my ass. They are the same ol' racist party they've been since pre-Civil War.

Wait, progress was supposed not to be racist!?

Originally posted by Bentley
Wait, progress was supposed not to be racist!?

I know, right?

Conservatives have the excuse in their name. They conserve, so logically that would include conserving racism.

I dunno, progressives seem to not wanna get rid of racism. Why else would they continually change the definition of what is racist? They wanna preserve it at all costs.