Batman (The Dark Knight) vs a Grizzly bear

Fairly sure that first link is from The Dark Knight Rises.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Equipment you can't prove he has.

He retains the equipment used in earlier movies per writer's intentions. That means he still has his explosives.

Originally posted by h1a8
He retains the equipment used in earlier movies per writer's intentions. That means he still has his explosives.

hahahahahahaha.. man you are pure gold. you moron... bale hardly used any equipment in the dark knight

Originally posted by h1a8
He retains the equipment used in earlier movies per writer's intentions. That means he still has his explosives.

Not according to IMP's mod ruling. which states that only the movie named by the OP can be used.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Not according to IMP's mod ruling. which states that only the movie named by the OP can be used.

Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
hahahahahahaha.. man you are pure gold. you moron... bale hardly used any equipment in the dark knight

He didn't fight a bear.

Originally posted by h1a8
He didn't fight a bear.

Writer’s intent.

Originally posted by h1a8
Get to the point. Stop debating that way

So... you haven't. Figures.

Why are you even posting on this site?

Originally posted by h1a8
It referred to feats, not equipment.
Batman's equipment remains either the same or improved. Writer's intent.

The ruling didn't specify feats, so are you going to ignore a mod ruling?

Just report him, enough of this clown.

Originally posted by Silent Master
The ruling didn't specify feats, so are you going to ignore a mod ruling?

There is no ruling that prevents Batman from having access to his standard equipment just because he didn't pull it out in a later movie.

Batman has plenty of equipment that wasn't used in Dark Knight. Doesn't mean he didn't have it.

Iron man has his missiles in Spider-Man movie although he didn't use them there.

Originally posted by riv6672
No, he fought dogs and got mauled.

Dogs are not a bear. Batman wasn't prepared and was surprised. In this fight he will be.

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
So... you haven't. Figures.

Why are you even posting on this site?

I'm posting to debate. You are posting to flame and troll.

Originally posted by h1a8
There is no ruling that prevents Batman from having access to his standard equipment just because he didn't pull it out in a later movie.

Batman has plenty of equipment that wasn't used in Dark Knight. Doesn't mean he didn't have it.

Iron man has his missiles in Spider-Man movie although he didn't use them there.

There is a ruling that states if a specific movie mentioned in the OP, only that movie can be used.

I've PM'd the mod to let him know that you're ignoring his ruling.

Everyone just give me a minute.

I deleted the previous posts because it went off topic because I misunderstood. My bad.

Let me post a revised ruling.

Originally posted by Impediment
I think I misunderstood the argument.

You're talking about weapons or feats from previous movies? Or both?

Originally posted by h1a8
Weapons (standard gear), not feats. Batman has grappling hooks, explosives, etc as standard gear. Silent is suggesting that just because he didnt use one of his standard gear in a movie (no scenario called for it) means that Batman didn't have access to it (or it was missing). That's like saying that Iron has no missiles and many other weapons in Spider-Man just because he wasn't shown to use them (there was no scenario that called for it).

I actually have to agree with that, h1a8.

"Standard equipment" is a touchy topic, but I now understand the argument presented to me.

I'm going to allow the use of said equipment because it has been shown in previous versions of Baleman, and because to not allow it would be substantially bad because of canonical use even if it isn't directly shown in a film.

I have to stick to my previous rulings because that would be unfair, even if it contradicts some of the things I have ruled upon. Again, my bad.

All I can say is (AND I MEAN THIS) that posters need to adhere to my rule to make an elaborate opening post about stips and limits and handicaps.

Having made my revised ruling, let's not gloat or be sore.

Back to topic, please.

So as long as a character is shown using something once, it is considered standard equipment. Okay, I can work with that.

Originally posted by Silent Master
So as long as a character is shown using something once, it is considered standard equipment. Okay, I can work with that.

I, of course, meant within reason, SM.

Mjolnir isn't standard equipment for Captain America.