Poll
67%
33%
Geralt. He's physically superior to Mando in every way due to the extensive genetic mutations and from the first episode has shown how proficient and speedy he is in a fight by slaughtering a half a dozen goons in a few seconds or taking down that monster. Also he's got his Signs that Mando has no defense against at all.
With only his sword he would have easily taken down the Mudhorn. Mando was dead if not for Baby Yoda.
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Mandos armor is much stronger than anything that sword can cut.I removed a few stips to make it a bit more fair.
His armor is stupidly tough. However it's not full plate and only covers small parts of his body. He's been hurt plenty of times where his armor isnt. He has plenty of fleshy bits exposed that Geralt can slice clean through.
Geralt also still has his Signs.
Based on what I have seen of both (which, admittedly, isn't all that much, especially for the Mando), I'd give a melee fight to Geralt and full-gear to the Mando. While he doesn't seem quite as formidable as Geralt in pure physicals, he seems extremely good at knowing when and how to best apply his gear in a fight, whether against multiple or singular opponents.
But I am waiting for a friend to torrent all of The Mandalorian to watch it at some point. Because, based on Disney's global "roadmap", Disney Plus literally won't be available here any time in the foreseeable future, so it's the only way I will get to see all of it before like 2022. And I genuinely do try to obtain things the right way when I can. But if I have to wait that long, by that time, I probably would have lost interest again.
Pure physicals? He flipped that giant Devaronian on his ass, tanked multiple strikes from a mud horn, and falls from tens of feet. In pure H2H he’s a rough peer with Cara/Fennec Shane. The best H2H feat Geralt has is killing these ghoul things that were basically skeletons
I’d also think killing Stormies >>> killing random knights.
Not that it matters because the sword will never break through Beskar
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Why not just pay for Disney plus lol it’s free for a week, you can watch the whole season now.
Disney Plus might be free where it's available, but it's not actually available where I live. And, as I mentioned, based on the "roadmap" that was laid out for Disney Plus, there are no plans in the next 2 years at least to change that.
Unfortunately not. Disney doesn't give a fook about where I live. But, on the flipside, they generally care very little if people here pirate their shit as well. It's a negligible market that they've already written off as not worth the effort to them. Outside the US, they'd rather focus on Europe, Asia and South America, and to a lesser degree Australia and New Zealand. And I get it. Relative to the rest of the world, the amount of people here who buy into these subscription services, or even pirate their IP, is extremely small relative to many other countries.
Originally posted by FrothByte
^ Canada is usually the first one they think of outside the US I think.. which has its pros and cons.
Well yeah, that kinda goes without saying. I was speaking more in terms of other continents and such. I'm in RSA, and no one really gives a shit about us (or the rest of the continent for the most part) unless it involves sticking a starving child in a viral clip for some political reason lol.