Why is the MSM and Democrats Allied with Iran?

Started by dadudemon4 pages
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Nobody wants war but my side doesn't want war more than your side doesn't want war.

My side? The Christian side who thinks killing even a single innocent is a grave sin and all of our foreign wars and foreign soil military occupations should end immediately?

Highly unlikely you're taking my non-interventionist libertarian, anti-Democrat, anti-Republican side.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Your side doesn't doesn't want war enough and because you don't don't want war enough you want war so if there's a war it won't be cause my side didn't not want war enough. It'll be cos your side barely didn't even not want war.

If you're talking about Trumpers, no, Trumpers are supposed to be Anti-War considering that was one of Trump's talking points and tweeting points (about how he was so much better than the existing Republicans and the warmongering Obama).

Originally posted by Robtard
This is low energy trolling.

Not even close to trolling. When you can't even engage in a single comment exchange without responding with your circular trolling, specifically due to the topic being discussed, it's obvious Surtur broke you. You broke Surtur, as well.

Originally posted by CaveDude33211
Democrats very likely had a lot of money tied into Hillary winning the election.

Lots of Leftist donor groups, private donors and supporters spending their own cash just to support Hillary - all for the idea of a first woman president (even though Hillary is a corrupt sociopath who is in Russia's pocket)

When Hillary lost - a lot of Democrat donors lost money, too - they lost big time.

It's a combination of sociopolitical-butthurt and Leftists wasting hundreds of millions of dollars and not getting a penny of their money back.

That's why there is a sociopathic-hatred towards Donald Trump that transcends logic and patriotism for their own country.

- Hell, Obama used to drone-kill enemy targets overseas all the time - notably.

But Trump takes out a leader of a state sponsor of terror and suddenly what started as a routine-operation is turned into Trump "going too far".

It doesn't matter - these delusional retards are going to lose again in 2020 anyway.

Those of us with brains get to sit back and enjoy the meltdown. 😎

Generally speaking, leftists were never really patriotic (at least not in decades). In fact, most of them hate America because they've been brainwashed by their teachers and professors to believe America is inherently bad and was "started by a bunch of racist old white guys."

It is true that their hatred of America has actually gotten worse under Trump though. Most of them now have fully embraced the idea of full blown socialism over free market capitalism and support censoring people's free speech as long as it is the speech of their political opponents and seem to want wide open borders as well.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Generally speaking, leftists were never really patriotic. In fact, most of them hate America because they've been brainwashed by their teachers and professors to believe America is inherently bad and was "started by a bunch of racist old white guys."

It is true that their hatred of America has actually gotten worse under Trump though. Most of them now have fully embraced the idea of full blown socialism over free market capitalism and support censoring people's free speech as long as it is the speech of their political opponents.

4chan needs to, super super badly, do another prank like the "OK" hand sign.

They need to say that things like "I am woke about race" or "I am against racism and for equality" are phrases of racists and it is code spoke for the white supremacists.

Watch as the leftist woke culture implodes as literally all of them are now accusing each other of being racists.

They did it with the OK hand sign so there's no reason to believe they would react appropriately and measured if the 4channers created a hoax with this kind of thing, too.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Not even close to trolling.

My comment had nothing to do with " a war with Iran", so yes, you did a non sequitur and then followed it up with trolling.

Now if you want to discuss what I said/point. Cool.

If you don't and want to go with your point about people saying WW3 is coming. That's cool too. LMK which.

Originally posted by Robtard
My comment had nothing to do with " a war with Iran",

...

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
Jesus Christ, we don't want unnecessary war and conflict [with Iran]. It has nothing to do with being allied with Iran. That shouldn't be a partisan issue.

Face-fu#king-palm.

Originally posted by Robtard
Bingo

This is the spin that has to be pushed, to try and silence and discredit anti-war and anti-conflict people.

???

My comment taken in full is about the same tactics used to silence people who don't want conflicts; that stands. Title of the thread is: "Why is the MSM and Democrats Allied with Iran?"

Originally posted by Robtard
Bingo

This is the spin that has to be pushed, to try and silence and discredit anti-war and anti-conflict people. Like in early years of the Iraq war, if you had a problem with it and said "we shouldn't be invading Iraq", you either "don't support the troops" or you had alliances to Iraq and/or terrorist groups.

It's why you hear these yahoos scream "TDS!" nigh every time someone brings up an issue with Trump or his admin, new phrases but same old tactics.

Originally posted by dadudemon
My side? The Christian side who thinks killing even a single innocent is a grave sin and all of our foreign wars and foreign soil military occupations should end immediately?

Highly unlikely you're taking my non-interventionist libertarian, anti-Democrat, anti-Republican side.

If you're talking about Trumpers, no, Trumpers are supposed to be Anti-War considering that was one of Trump's talking points and tweeting points (about how he was so much better than the existing Republicans and the warmongering Obama).

You're not wanting war not enough toactually not want war therefore you actually want war you filthy warmonger.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Maybe they got Soleimani confused with an 80s action movie terrorist bad guy. That's what he looks in the picture of him they use the most on the news.

He actually does look like a final boss Steven Seagal would have aikido flipped and then neck-snapped wile delivering a snappy line and a mean stare.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Bingo

Wait, what? No. No bingo.

What war? There is no war. The media is pushing a war narrative because TDS.

What are you talking about?

It wasn't cool when the Conservatards did it about Obama. It's certainly not okay with the MSM libtards do it to Trump.

Bingo. These people, at this point, are just f*cking dumb.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
Stupid thread.

Should be closed.

No you

Originally posted by Surtur
Bingo. These people, at this point, are just f*cking dumb.
I've yet to hear anyone say we're in an active war with Iran right now. Do you have links?

The concerns/fears I've seen are of the potential in getting us into another war.

The "WWIII" comments are stupid, but seem to be mostly not serious commentary.

Indeed they are. We really need to leave the Middle East and let Europe deal with it.

Democrats used to love war, what happened?

The US routinely commits more acts of terrorism than Iran ever has in the Middle East.

Puff, puff, give.

Originally posted by Robtard
My comment taken in full is about the same tactics used to silence people who don't want conflicts; that stands. Title of the thread is: "Why is the MSM and Democrats Allied with Iran?"

So I'm not allowed to respond to your posts and their actual content and I am only allowed to respond to your posts AFTER I point out something stupid you said, you have time to think about it, then you specify some rules about what I can and cannot respond about concerning your posts?

So next time, just to be clear, when I see a stupid point you made and you don't like it, I have to wait for you to outline the rules about what I can reply with and then apologize afterwards and only operate within the new goal-post box of rules you've moved and made for me, right?

This is by far my favorite waste of time, today.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
You're not wanting war not enough toactually not want war therefore you actually want war you filthy warmonger.

How dare I.

Guess I'll stop with the PAC I am part of and the anti-corruption chapter I started in Tulsa. I don't want it enough. 🙁

Originally posted by Silent Master
Democrats used to love war, what happened?

Democrats only love war when a Democrat is in the White House and the Democrats control Capitol Hill.

Edit - TRIPLE POST, because this is not like Discord or Slack.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Puff, puff, give.

Is someone ****ing up the rotation?