John Murdoch
Senior Member
Originally posted by SquallX
Good movie, good action, decent story.The problem were the critics. They hated Superman Return because it lacked action, but ***** because MOS had to much action.
They also ***** that Superman wasn’t actively being shown saving civilians, then they ***** that he cause too much environmental damage. I was like *****! What do you think would happen if god like beings fought in real life!
They ***** and moan even more after he snapped Zod’s neck. I was like, Yes!
My thoughts exactly on the "Superman murders people" fallacy.
Multiple comic book movies had been released every year since Blade, X-Men 1, and especially Spider-Man kicked off the superhero movie restart from 98-2002. After that, Raimi's Spider-Man trilogy dominated the mid-2000's amidst the good (V for Vendetta, Batman Begins, Sin City, 300), the bad (FF: Rise of the Silver Surfer, Ghost Rider), and the ugly (Catwoman).
Then, boom, Nolan directs TDK and it drops in July 2008, and everyone and their mom looks for the next comic film masterpiece. This is just a couple months after the inaugural MCU film Iron Man, which just gave a hint of things to come with a connected universe.
Fast forward 4 years: the connected universe thing becomes a 1.6 billion dollar reality with one of the biggest films ever in Avengers 1. 1st movie to gross over 200 million US dollars opening weekend, 1st one to gross over $100 million the second weekend, beloved by critics and fans alike, and even bests Nolan's Batman trilogy closer, TDKR. The MCU was the new standard bearer.
However, their formula hadn't reached well-oiled machine into nigh-perfect popcorn flick status yet (Cap: Winter Soldier, GotG, Civil War, Phase II ending into Phase III). Also, the MCU hadn't made every month of the year a viable blockbuster month (the highest grossing North American film of the year, Black Panther, gets released in February?! And the first comic book film to get a Best Picture nom?! INSANE), so MoS was a classic major tentpole Summer event. Iron Man 3 opened Summer 2013, but Man of Steel was the show-stopper audiences were anticipating in mid-Summer.
Despite the hype, the fantastic marketing campaign, and it being perhaps the most beautiful comic book film to date, critic and audience reviews came back mixed, and the box office returns were fine but not up to WB's anticipated results. And thus, WB execs course-corrected far too much with the likes BvS, Suicide Squad, and Justice League. They have now learned their lesson: give filmmakers creative control and do solo movies and standalones to build up your universe: Wonder Woman, Aquaman, Shazam!, and Joker.
Alas, I've written my histories on the modern superhero film.
For the topic at hand, Man of Steel was one of my favorite superhero films ever at the time of its release: it still has the best fight scenes in any superhero film to date (barring the Titan fight in IW), took an interesting turn by delving more into sci-fi invasion territory, is a technical showcase, has an incredible score, and Cavill played the role of Clark Kent/Kal-El well. However, I noticed while watching it at my local cinema's opening midnight showing that the editing was jarring and the script had some downright awful decisions, #1 of which is Jon Kent deciding to commit suicide-by-tornado. Ridiculous.
MoS is now probably in my top 11-20 comic book movies. The MCU, while formulaic, has had far too many well-made and entertaining movies released since 2013 (and at least one, Infinity War, that I consider to be among the best films ever made), and the DCEU itself has changed its stripes along the lines of the four films I mentioned above.