Coronavirus

Started by Robtard504 pages

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Robtard has never gotten a real ban in his entire time here except for "continuing to display rants after multiple warnings"

This is on his ban notes, he refuses to accept it because he cant stand the fact he actually got banned.

His othe two bans are joke bans. He will have you believe the first one I mentioned never happened. Which is a lie.

No, I've said I've been banned before...

What did PR ban you for list it

Originally posted by Robtard
No, I've said I've been banned before...

Yea but you have refused to accept the reason you were banned which was ranting after multiple warnings.

Originally posted by Scribble
Just ban them all. Give them the rest of the year off. Honestly they'd all benefit from it. I think it'd go a long way in restoring some sanity to this place. If one has gone, the others should too.

Honestly, the mods have been mulling over that for a while. But the issue is that what little activity the forum has would probably slow to a crawl. Troublemakers or trolls or whatever you want to call them, drive traffic. They always have. So then the question becomes, well, how long do we ban them for.

Yes, some of them are going to cry about bias or that the mods have some personal vendetta against them... when we really don't. I mean, don't derail threads and you pretty much get left alone, and you can, to an extent, say whatever you like. Look how much leeway people have been given in the past.

And it was a JOKE Each time. Like the last time when the Mods asked POLITELY if You would Mind it.

Go To HELL You PrincessCupFullOfSHIT!

And BURN IN IT!

Originally posted by -Pr-
Honestly, the mods have been mulling over that for a while. But the issue is that what little activity the forum has would probably slow to a crawl. Troublemakers or trolls or whatever you want to call them, drive traffic. They always have. So then the question becomes, well, how long do we ban them for.

Yes, some of them are going to cry about bias or that the mods have some personal vendetta against them... when we really don't. I mean, don't derail threads and you pretty much get left alone, and you can, to an extent, say whatever you like. Look how much leeway people have been given in the past.

But you can't explain why whirly is given socking privileges lol

You can't say it's cuz he changed cuz you would have needed to allow him to post under a sock for a while before determing he changed

This is why you are biased. Stop trying to gaslight folk like it is something else.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b] And it was a JOKE Each time. Like the last time when the Mods asked POLITELY if You would Mind it.

Go To HELL You PrincessCupFullOfSHIT!

And BURN IN IT! [/B]

I genuinely don't understand what you're saying. Could you elaborate, please?

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Robtard has never gotten a real ban in his entire time here except for "continuing to display rants after multiple warnings"

This is on his ban notes, he refuses to accept it because he cant stand the fact he actually got banned.

His othe two bans are joke bans. He will have you believe the first one I mentioned never happened. Which is a lie.

Not all his bans have times on them, but there are like, 11 of the things. And Ush did some of them. I'd imagine he banned Rob for a while. He was a cantankerous ****.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b] And it was a JOKE Each time. Like the last time when the Mods asked POLITELY if You would Mind it.

Go To HELL You PrincessCupFullOfSHIT!

And BURN IN IT! [/B]

Mods legit virtue signaled like little babies and posted a now deleted thread warning against lies about others, etc.

Got deleted. Can a mod explain why?

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Yea but you have refused to accept the reason you were banned which was ranting after multiple warnings.

The reason's listed were that, but that one was also WrathfulDward iirc. He banned me because I stood up for someone he hated, Bardock42

WD is/was a known nutter

Well glad you owned up to that one👆

WD was more of a nutter than PR?

I'd like to go back to the actual topic at hand, so I'm just going to say this before I log off.

If Surtur comes back in a month and wants a clean slate, cool. No harm done, and hopefully we can go from there. If not, well, that's really up to him. We've forgiven worse things than Surt has done, so if he is genuine, then cool.

It's a much better option than the alternative.

I'm not going to comment further on mods in the past. Hell knows I didn't get on with a few of them, and a few of them turned out to be right *****. I try my best not to be like that, but I know I can't please everyone, so I'm not going to try.

==

As far as covid goes, I'm hoping that the roll out of this vaccine means some normality returning. God knows we need it.

Originally posted by -Pr-
I genuinely don't understand what you're saying. Could you elaborate, please?

Not all his bans have times on them, but there are like, 11 of the things. And Ush did some of them. I'd imagine he banned Rob for a while. He was a cantankerous ****.

😂

Originally posted by -Pr-
[B]I'd like to go back to the actual topic at hand, so I'm just going to say this before I log off.

If Surtur comes back in a month and wants a clean slate, cool. No harm done, and hopefully we can go from there. If not, well, that's really up to him. We've forgiven worse things than Surt has done, so if he is genuine, then cool.

It's a much better option than the alternative.

I'm not going to comment further on mods in the past. Hell knows I didn't get on with a few of them, and a few of them turned out to be right *****. I try my best not to be like that, but I know I can't please everyone, so I'm not going to try.

Okay, I'll be posting under this screen name until the other ban is lifted.

If you can stop the banning, I'll give you a clean slate when my original account is unlocked if you apologize.

Ban this name and it will just continue, btw. That goes for any other mod too: don't do it. Or if you do, ban whirly and folk too.

Originally posted by -Pr-
Honestly, the mods have been mulling over that for a while. But the issue is that what little activity the forum has would probably slow to a crawl. Troublemakers or trolls or whatever you want to call them, drive traffic. They always have. So then the question becomes, well, how long do we ban them for.

Yes, some of them are going to cry about bias or that the mods have some personal vendetta against them... when we really don't. I mean, don't derail threads and you pretty much get left alone, and you can, to an extent, say whatever you like. Look how much leeway people have been given in the past.

The traffic in the GDF, perhaps, but not the rest of the forum. The comics bit is still active and the OTF is very reliable for consistent poster income. Banning one member for what is essentially a widespread issue is only going to cause further issues down the line.

Derailing threads is par the course for the GDF, and there are plenty of posters who actually avoid the GDF because of this toxicity. Better conversation may well arise if a certain 6 or 7 members weren't dominating every topic with their infighting nonsense. Just look at the threads... it's all the same shit and all the same people enacting that shit. Surtur 100% contributes more than his share of this, but banning only him will create nothing but more of what you're talking about.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Well glad you owned up to that one👆

WD was more of a nutter than PR?

When did I deny it.

PR's not a nutter. He's a pretty chill dude and he takes a lot of shit before raising a finger.

Yes, I understand that he's on you people's shit-list right now, but that's not hard to get on, simply have to disagree with you.

Originally posted by Scribble
The traffic in the GDF, perhaps, but not the rest of the forum. The comics bit is still active and the OTF is very reliable for consistent poster income. Banning one member for what is essentially a widespread issue is only going to cause further issues down the line.

Derailing threads is par the course for the GDF, and there are plenty of posters who actually avoid the GDF because of this toxicity. Better conversation may well arise if a certain 6 or 7 members weren't dominating every topic with their infighting nonsense. Just look at the threads... it's all the same shit and all the same people enacting that shit. Surtur 100% contributes more than his share of this, but banning only him will create nothing but more of what you're talking about.

Another good point. Why is it they only raise a stink when certain people derail threads?

Originally posted by Robtard
When did I deny it.

PR's not a nutter. He's a pretty chill dude and he takes a lot of shit before raising a finger.

Yes, I understand that he's on you people's shit-list right now, but that's not hard to get on, simply have to disagree with you.

Hey Rob, can you smell that? Geez, there's shit all over your nose.

😆

Originally posted by Robtard
When did I deny it.

PR's not a nutter. He's a pretty chill dude and he takes a lot of shit before raising a finger.

Yes, I understand that he's on you people's shit-list right now, but that's not hard to get on, simply have to disagree with you.

We joke around all the time, maybe you should get your nose out of his ass?

Remember all the times I called you a kiss ass, this is one of them.

I know you can never admit you are wrong, so lets see how far you want to go down the road with this wrong take on things.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
We joke around all the time, maybe you should get your nose out of his ass?

Remember all the times I called you a kiss ass, this is one of them.

So you agree PR's a chill dude, yet me saying that is asskissing...

How does your brain work.